Author Topic: Where did the first person come from?  (Read 15083 times)

calfzilla

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20790
  • YUMAN FILTH!
Where did the first person come from?
« on: November 24, 2016, 12:23:55 AM »
First off I'm Atheist, but this thought popped into my head while reading a book today: if it wasn't a creation by god, then how did the first person come to be?  I assume the short answer is evolution but would love to hear what others have to say.

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: Where did the first person come from?
« Reply #1 on: November 25, 2016, 12:01:10 PM »
Evolution, at the very most, could explain the movement from single celled lifeforms, to multi-cellular lifeforms, to lifeforms with a central nervous system, to human beings with conscious reasoning faculties and a sense of existential concern that transcends mere experience.

Although I do not believe that there are sufficient biological mechanisms for that sort of "molecules-to-man" evolution to take place, I do not mind granted the possibility for the sake of discussion.

So let's enter into the hypothetical world in which plants in the ocean evolved into fish in the ocean, fish in the ocean evolved into land animals, and land animals evolved into human beings (because that is what the modern theory of evolution describes).

Ok, now we have a hypothetical world in which we understand the development from "simple" lifeforms to human beings. However, the original question - about the origin of life itself - is still left completely unanswered. The vast majority of evolutionists actually prefer to ignore this question because they know that the question itself is both 1) a serious challenge to evolutionary theory, and 2) completely outside the realm of science.

The theory of evolution depends on the pre-existence of life. Evolution is an attempt to explain how "simple" creatures became human beings. It presupposes the existence of life, the pre-existence of a "simple" creature, and tries to explain how that original creature's descendants became human over time. So if you present an evolutionist with concerns about the origin of life, they will brush your concerns aside and tell you that the origin of life is completely irrelevant and erroneous when speaking of evolution. The validity of the theory of evolution, according to these people, does not depend upon the validity of an evolutionary mechanism for the origin of life, because (according to them) the evolutionary theory concerns the change that occurs within lifeforms over time - not the origin of life itself.  I would object to their position, but suffice to say that logic does allow them to hold it.

Now, what does science say about the origin of life? Again, evolutionists avoid this question. The truth is that science has never observed any possible natural mechanism for the origin of life in the universe. Every honest scientist will admit this to you. The origin of life is a complete and total mystery to scientists. Although they will jump to provide all their biological and cosmological theories whenever someone asks about the origin of life and the universe, when pressed about the specific question regarding the process by which the first lifeform came into existence, they will admit that their theories do not speak on this specific question. And in truth, science is actually incapable of speaking to this question.

Science is limited to empirical observation. Science, by its very definition, is based upon observation and experimentation. So, even if we knew where to look in order to observe the process of 'abiogenesis' to occur, all we would be left with is the observation of the miraculous event whereby some non-living matter would suddenly gain personal intelligence, intentional function, and life within itself. There is no way in which abiogenesis (the creation of life from non-life) could ever be explained scientifically, even if a person witnessed such a miraculous event. The arrival of life is supernatural. Non-living matter does not just come alive, no matter how much non-living matter is mixed with it, and no matter how long we allow for the non-living matter to mix around together. The moment life arises is supernatural and beyond scientific explanation.

Some scientists have tried to explain this away by saying that maybe the first lifeform was planted here on earth by a super intelligent alien species from a distant galaxy. They offer up this as an explanation because 1) they recognize that there is absolutely no mechanism for life to occur naturally, 2) they recognize that the quality and characteristics we observe in all lifeforms are such that they could have only came about through design - and the design is something far, far beyond our own intelligence's capabilities. But what they fail to recognize is that attributing the origin of life on earth to aliens is simply "kicking the can down the road." The question remains completely unanswered, we have only moved the origin from earth to some distant unknown planet. Maybe, these scientists hope, the conditions are different elsewhere in the universe. Maybe the amount of heat, water, and organic minerals are different on the planet the aliens come from, and maybe those differences make their planet more conducive to abiogenesis than our own. But what they fail to recognize is that - no matter what the material conditions - life does not arise from non-living matter.

Life is a metaphysical, transcendent reality. Consciousness, intentional personal behavior, feelings and emotions, and especially the reasoning faculty - these are all realities that far exceed anything the material world could generate on it's own. A transcendent, metaphysical force is required.

So whats the origin of humanity? Well, whats the origin of life? If a person were to reject the premise that life requires transcendent, metaphysical causation, then they would not be able to offer any meaningful answer. For such a person the answer to any and every question about how things happen is "they just do." Without reference to an ultimate, transcendent, eternal, metaphysical reality behind the universe, a person cannot answer questions about how things happen. They can only observe things happening. As to why something happens instead of nothing happening, they cannot say. All they know is that they observe things happening. They cannot say anything regarding the nature of how they actually do happen. So we are only left with two choices: we can choose to believe that there is no ultimate mechanism determining how things happen, or we can recognize that as living beings we have been given life from life itself. Life comes from life, and the existence of life requires life. Therefore, the source of life is eternal and dependent on no one and nothing but itself. The source of life is eternal, is life itself, and is completely independent of all other things. And it is greater than all things, infinitely greater, to the extent that all created things - whether living or non-living - are mere creatures and were brought into existence by Him.

He is God. And He revealed Himself to us. He chose to empty Himself and become a human being in order to live among us, teach us about Himself, and win for us our redemption from evil. Going to the cross, allowing Himself to be brutally tortured to death on our behalf, He also opened Himself up to every bit of darkness and evil that exists in the universe. Every perverse and wicked temptation, every evil creature who has perverted the life that God gave them and turned themselves in God's enemies, every form of sin and suffering in existence... On the cross, while in extreme physical agony, Jesus allowed all these things to surround and attack Him, to try with all their might to seduce Him, to make Him suffer, to darken Him and bring about His destruction. And Jesus endured that agony, both spiritual and physical, and in doing so He swallowed up and destroyed all the wickedness that sought to take advantage of Him in His weakness. In His infinite love and mercy, God entered into the heart of evil, and of course God did not let evil invade Him in anyway, but rather, God invaded evil, and His infinite love and mercy swallowed it all up, and destroyed it, like a sponge He soaked up all of our sin so that we would not have to bear it's weight, and He cast it all out, destroyed it in eternal fire and outer darkness, never to be seen again. Although the source of life had given us our own life, and although we responded with wickedness and not gratitude, and although we chose to make ourselves His enemy instead of walk with Him as friends, yet God in His infinite love and mercy towards us chose to suffer unthinkable agony on our behalf, becoming our Savior.

The source of life, then, is for us also the source of new life; and the source of eternal life. Though we may suffer death in our physical bodies, those of us who enter into God's love and mercy will be given new bodies, and we will live forever with Him in a new world free from all pain and suffering, free from all sin. The source of life will become for us our deeply personal source of life, not just in an ultimate metaphysical sense, but through direct personal relationship. He is God, and if we choose we can invite Him to come into our life and take His rightful place as God, and if we enter eternity with Him as our God then He will become our God forever in the most comprehensive and beautiful way possible. He is the only God, there is no other, but for sinful human beings He is often times an object of non-acknowledgement. Due to sin, He becomes distant from us. It is possible for a person to live their whole life never knowing Him. But He is there for those who desire to know Him.

For those who seek understanding, for those who want to know about the origin and meaning of life, and for those who seek this knowledge with sincerity and an open heart, God will make Himself known. Science is limited in this regard. Science cannot observe and thus cannot enter into the realm of metaphysics. Metaphysical pursuits are outside the realm of science, and scientists who limit themselves to science alone are limiting themselves from the pursuit of metaphysical truth. The scientist will never be able to speak on the origin and meaning of life unless he first cast away the empirical prejudice and becomes a philosopher. The origin of life is a philosophical question, a metaphysical question, and it appears that many fail to understand this important distinction. As if the answer to this question can be found by looking through microscopes and telescopes, people look to the ground and to the sky in order to find what can only be found by looking in their hearts and looking in their minds.

"You shall seek me, and shall find me: when you shall seek me with all your heart."


(Jeremiah 29:13)

Ropo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2895
Re: Where did the first person come from?
« Reply #2 on: November 25, 2016, 11:49:47 PM »
First off I'm Atheist, but this thought popped into my head while reading a book today: if it wasn't a creation by god, then how did the first person come to be?  I assume the short answer is evolution but would love to hear what others have to say.

As it has been proved, first person didn't pop out from somewhere, it born by the evolution during billions of years. While religious people has great problems to understand large figures like billions, science understand them perfectly and it has evidences from many different time periods far before the time when "God" "create" this universe. Short version: earth was born 4 600 000 000 years ago. That is lot of years. Remains of biotic life" were found in 4.1 billion-year-old rocks in Western Australia, so there has been some forms of life 4 100 000 000 years ago.

Then we could jump few billion years ahead (3 300 000 000 years), and we be there where the first multicellular organism appear, at 800 000 000 years ago. That's 8 hundred million years ago, meaning it is quite a long time. Then we could jump over few millions of years, and we are at the time when first mammals appears, at 225 000 000 years ago. Yet another ridiculously large number, but all these are based on facts and evidence, fossils etc. findings.

Yet another jump of millions of years, and we are at the point where first hominids appears, at the 6 500 000 years ago. Hominids means first big apes, and it take a 4 093 500 000 years to get this far, and we are still at the time millions of years before the time when homo sapiens were born. That take place at 2 500 000 years ago, so somewhere there were the time when first person was born. Of course we could argue about the question what the person means, and of course even the homo ancestors and Neanderthals has personality, but on the other hand, why don't we use the time period when first anatomically modern human appeared?

So what is the point? Point is to learn to understand figures which are too large to understand by average intelligence. This is where religious people will stumble, they don't have that ability, even it is quite simple. Just scale it down to the form which you can understand: If we use seconds instead of years, what is the difference of million and billion? 1 million seconds is 12 days, and 1 billion seconds is 32 years. That put some perspective at the matter, isn't it?

The Ugly

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21286
Re: Where did the first person come from?
« Reply #3 on: November 26, 2016, 10:33:11 PM »
Africa, essentially. But there was no "first person," really. As there's no "missing link." Because there were MANY missing links and first persons.

Or maybe it was Adam. That dude from Eden.


Ropo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2895
Re: Where did the first person come from?
« Reply #4 on: November 27, 2016, 12:00:01 AM »
Africa, essentially. But there was no "first person," really. As there's no "missing link." Because there were MANY missing links and first persons.

Or maybe it was Adam. That dude from Eden.



Sorry to say, but 4 billion years old fossils doesn't fit in the creation theory, but they play big part in the evolution theory  ;D

calfzilla

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20790
  • YUMAN FILTH!
Re: Where did the first person come from?
« Reply #5 on: November 27, 2016, 12:03:12 AM »
MOS deleting posts in this thread.  ;D

Man of Steel

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19388
  • Isaiah40:28-31 ✝ Romans10:9 ✝ 1Peter3:15
Re: Where did the first person come from?
« Reply #6 on: November 27, 2016, 07:49:03 AM »
MOS deleting posts in this thread.  ;D

Only mine LOL.  There's little to zero point in me posting anymore.  Everyone around these parts has sealed their own fate.  Even this post is meaningless.

I'm tired of working my tail off to write thoughtful responses for nothing.  So folks that want to argue against a Christian answer can use Google.

This place doesn't want a Religion board.  This place is fully atheist and unfortunately hellbound.....real shame. 

Hopefully a few lives were turned to God because of it.

calfzilla

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20790
  • YUMAN FILTH!
Re: Where did the first person come from?
« Reply #7 on: November 27, 2016, 11:18:49 AM »
Only mine LOL.  There's little to zero point in me posting anymore.  Everyone around these parts has sealed their own fate.  Even this post is meaningless.

I'm tired of working my tail off to write thoughtful responses for nothing.  So folks that want to argue against a Christian answer can use Google.

This place doesn't want a Religion board.  This place is fully atheist and unfortunately hellbound.....real shame. 

Hopefully a few lives were turned to God because of it.

Just giving you shit.  :D I know you deleted it just to keep things more positive.

Ropo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2895
Re: Where did the first person come from?
« Reply #8 on: November 28, 2016, 12:29:18 AM »
Only mine LOL.  There's little to zero point in me posting anymore.  Everyone around these parts has sealed their own fate.  Even this post is meaningless.

I'm tired of working my tail off to write thoughtful responses for nothing.  So folks that want to argue against a Christian answer can use Google.

This place doesn't want a Religion board.  This place is fully atheist and unfortunately hellbound.....real shame. 

Hopefully a few lives were turned to God because of it.

Or you are just wrong because you are an idiot, blindfolded by religion. Here is different perspective for you: God is almighty, he see and knows everything, and he has create all mankind to reflect and praise his wisdom. Therefore also atheist must be part of his work, and the arguments which they use are from God. Maybe atheists are the tool he uses to teach you that your religion is man made bullshit. God is in everything, he doesn't need churches and priests, he should live in your heart instead of all that hate. How about that? Your problem is that you don't really trust your God at all, so you know better who he should throw in hell and whose not. God is almighty, so why the atheists? Why decreasing number of religious people around the globe, and why rising number of atheists? Because it is Gods work, that's why. What else it could be, if you really believe in God? Don't you get it? Everything what you see, hear, taste etc. or register in any ways or means  is from God, because your religion says so. Therefore also atheistic arguments are from God, and they are because God want to test your trust in him. It seem to me that you fail miserably because you don't trust your God, so you are the one who is going to hell.. ;D

avxo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5605
  • Iron Pumping University Math Professor
Re: Where did the first person come from?
« Reply #9 on: November 28, 2016, 12:34:37 AM »
Only mine LOL.  There's little to zero point in me posting anymore.  Everyone around these parts has sealed their own fate.  Even this post is meaningless.

I'm tired of working my tail off to write thoughtful responses for nothing.  So folks that want to argue against a Christian answer can use Google.

This place doesn't want a Religion board.  This place is fully atheist and unfortunately hellbound.....real shame. 

Hopefully a few lives were turned to God because of it.

Well, at least you'll survive. It wouldn't be heaven if there weren't oiled men in thongs.

Man of Steel

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19388
  • Isaiah40:28-31 ✝ Romans10:9 ✝ 1Peter3:15
Re: Where did the first person come from?
« Reply #10 on: November 28, 2016, 02:47:43 PM »
Or you are just wrong because you are an idiot, blindfolded by religion. Here is different perspective for you: God is almighty, he see and knows everything, and he has create all mankind to reflect and praise his wisdom. Therefore also atheist must be part of his work, and the arguments which they use are from God. Maybe atheists are the tool he uses to teach you that your religion is man made bullshit. God is in everything, he doesn't need churches and priests, he should live in your heart instead of all that hate. How about that? Your problem is that you don't really trust your God at all, so you know better who he should throw in hell and whose not. God is almighty, so why the atheists? Why decreasing number of religious people around the globe, and why rising number of atheists? Because it is Gods work, that's why. What else it could be, if you really believe in God? Don't you get it? Everything what you see, hear, taste etc. or register in any ways or means  is from God, because your religion says so. Therefore also atheistic arguments are from God, and they are because God want to test your trust in him. It seem to me that you fail miserably because you don't trust your God, so you are the one who is going to hell.. ;D

Didn't read, don't care, go away....enjoy this reply.

Ropo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2895
Re: Where did the first person come from?
« Reply #11 on: November 29, 2016, 01:27:45 AM »
Didn't read, don't care, go away....enjoy this reply.

Well, we all know that denialism is the true force of the Christianity..As I say, blindfolded by religion.  ;D 

Man of Steel

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19388
  • Isaiah40:28-31 ✝ Romans10:9 ✝ 1Peter3:15
Re: Where did the first person come from?
« Reply #12 on: November 29, 2016, 07:06:48 AM »
Well, we all know that denialism is the true force of the Christianity..As I say, blindfolded by religion.  ;D  

I'm sure you feel some sick sense of vindication as though you've stumped the Christian because I'm not responding to you.  Much like the new atheist Freakgeek in recent weeks.   Y'all are simply late to the party.   Every year new little atheists become more contributing members of GB and y'all all bring the EXACT SAME STUFF as it pertains to religion as every single atheist before you already has.

Here's the reality though...you don't care one bit about the comments you're posting....this is just a silly game....it's entertainment for you.

I'm no longer interested in entertaining every little atheist comment because it's the same regurgitated opinions and memes over and over and over....ad nauseum.  At this stage (as it pertains to GB) I know virtually every single outcome of dialogue, flow of conversation, pattern of logic, etc....before it's even played out.  I've been through it so many times I just know.  Further I can guarantee that 99% of your position has been answered by me 50 times in the past and I haven't even read your posts....that isn't arrogance either it's just simple experience.   So see my post history if you care at all.....you won't because you don't but it's there regardless until Ron decides to eliminate it.  Most likely someone else has answered it as well.

Or better still, try Google or a library.....the offices of MOS are closed but the gospel of Christ remains stickied above.

Ropo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2895
Re: Where did the first person come from?
« Reply #13 on: November 30, 2016, 12:09:37 AM »
I'm sure you feel some sick sense of vindication as though you've stumped the Christian because I'm not responding to you.  Much like the new atheist Freakgeek in recent weeks.   Y'all are simply late to the party.   Every year new little atheists become more contributing members of GB and y'all all bring the EXACT SAME STUFF as it pertains to religion as every single atheist before you already has.

Here's the reality though...you don't care one bit about the comments you're posting....this is just a silly game....it's entertainment for you.

I'm no longer interested in entertaining every little atheist comment because it's the same regurgitated opinions and memes over and over and over....ad nauseum.  At this stage (as it pertains to GB) I know virtually every single outcome of dialogue, flow of conversation, pattern of logic, etc....before it's even played out.  I've been through it so many times I just know.  Further I can guarantee that 99% of your position has been answered by me 50 times in the past and I haven't even read your posts....that isn't arrogance either it's just simple experience.   So see my post history if you care at all.....you won't because you don't but it's there regardless until Ron decides to eliminate it.  Most likely someone else has answered it as well.

Or better still, try Google or a library.....the offices of MOS are closed but the gospel of Christ remains stickied above.

So what the fuck you do in these forums in the first place? Why don't you just leave, read your bible, wank off? You are here because you think you know something, and when atheist show how fucking little it is, you are disappointed, but deep inside you know they have all the facts. Your religion, what ever it is, cannot explain scientific finds by any other way than by denialism. They find a fossils, 40 million years old, you say it can't be  because God create earth just 7 000 years back, so there can't be anything 40 million years old. That is just stupidity, and there is nothing holy about the stupidity. What I find amusing is these new finds about chimpanzees: New study's about these apes has proved, that evolution has rise the intellect of the chimps so much, that they have show signs of the religion. What it means is the fact, that smartest of the chimps and dumbest of the humans have something common.. ;D

light weight baby

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2366
Re: Where did the first person come from?
« Reply #14 on: November 30, 2016, 12:32:01 AM »
a monkey took legit kigs,,,, and mutated

only because he did not take strango trenbolona,,, he did not blow up right

Man of Steel

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19388
  • Isaiah40:28-31 ✝ Romans10:9 ✝ 1Peter3:15
Re: Where did the first person come from?
« Reply #15 on: November 30, 2016, 06:27:27 AM »
So what the fuck you do in these forums in the first place? Why don't you just leave, read your bible, wank off? You are here because you think you know something, and when atheist show how fucking little it is, you are disappointed, but deep inside you know they have all the facts. Your religion, what ever it is, cannot explain scientific finds by any other way than by denialism. They find a fossils, 40 million years old, you say it can't be  because God create earth just 7 000 years back, so there can't be anything 40 million years old. That is just stupidity, and there is nothing holy about the stupidity. What I find amusing is these new finds about chimpanzees: New study's about these apes has proved, that evolution has rise the intellect of the chimps so much, that they have show signs of the religion. What it means is the fact, that smartest of the chimps and dumbest of the humans have something common.. ;D

All the vast majority of atheists show me is arrogance, ignorance and ugliness....you're a cliche, typical, meme driven atheist.   It's not that your objections can't be answered....they can and I've demonstrated that for years.  I just know the difference between an atheist wanting to truly engage in meaningful dialogue and one that doesn't.  I don't have to drink the entire contents of the spoiled milk carton to know it's bad....I can sniff it once and know what's up.  And lucky for you I'm not worried about engaging all the silly little atheists of this board anymore.  I don't owe your ilk anything and if you don't like it so what?

Ropo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2895
Re: Where did the first person come from?
« Reply #16 on: November 30, 2016, 11:59:37 PM »
All the vast majority of atheists show me is arrogance, ignorance and ugliness....you're a cliche, typical, meme driven atheist.   It's not that your objections can't be answered....they can and I've demonstrated that for years.  I just know the difference between an atheist wanting to truly engage in meaningful dialogue and one that doesn't.  I don't have to drink the entire contents of the spoiled milk carton to know it's bad....I can sniff it once and know what's up.  And lucky for you I'm not worried about engaging all the silly little atheists of this board anymore.  I don't owe your ilk anything and if you don't like it so what?

Exactly how it is possible to engage in "meaningful dialogue" with the man driven by blind faith? I know as a fact that even if the Christ himself would step down from the heaven and tell you that evolution theory is 100% correct, he couldn't change your mind about it, because you are just an prejudiced twat   ;D