Trump = Winning

[chaos]

If you know this, why can't you break free from it?

Window lickers gonna window lick.

Did they have 60% enriched uranium or not?

If they did, I think the initial onslaught was justified, not violent or destructive enough, but justified.

[Grape Ape]

If they did, I think the initial onslaught was justified, not violent or destructive enough, but justified.

That's been my stance from the beginning.

[funk51]

Window lickers gonna window lick.
If they did, I think the initial onslaught was justified, not violent or destructive enough, but justified.

   

   

                   Spoken by a true short bus student too bad your parents didn't know about lead paint in the crib.., yeah, they might have 60 percent. key word might, let's blow up a little girls school and stop future terrorists. Right, I know now you'll accuse me of fake outrage. I guess you are all in on bombing little kids.

[Grape Ape]

yeah, they might have 60 percent. key word might,

What part of the below screams "might" to you?

Try to use your own words, no pictures or video are necessary, unless you have a link that refutes the following.  I even threw in one of your lefty sites to make you feel comfortable.

Yes, it was confirmed years ago and has been repeatedly verified by the IAEA.
Iran began enriching uranium to 60% purity (U-235) in April 2021, announcing it as a response to an alleged sabotage at Natanz. Iranian officials publicly stated that enrichment to this level had started, and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has since confirmed and monitored it through inspections and reports.
Key Details from IAEA Reports and Other Sources:

Production and Stockpile: Iran has produced and accumulated hundreds of kilograms of uranium enriched up to 60%. For example:
As of early 2025–mid-2025 reports (pre-major 2025 strikes), the stockpile reached around 440.9 kg of 60% enriched uranium (in UF6 form).
Earlier figures showed steady growth, e.g., ~275 kg by February 2025, with monthly production rates of several kilograms (sometimes ~9 kg/month or higher).

Significance: 60% enrichment is considered "highly enriched uranium" (HEU) and is a major step toward weapons-grade levels (~90%). It has no credible civilian use for power reactors (which need ~3–5%) and is close enough that further enrichment to bomb-grade is relatively straightforward technically.
IAEA Verification: The IAEA has directly verified large portions of this material (e.g., hundreds of kg produced since 2021–2022). Reports from 2024–2026 explicitly note Iran as the only non-nuclear-weapon state under the NPT producing and stockpiling uranium at this level.

This is well-documented across IAEA quarterly reports, Reuters, AP, Arms Control Association, and other outlets. Note that following conflicts in 2025 (including strikes on facilities), access and exact current status became more limited, but the prior enrichment to 60% and the resulting stockpile are established facts.

Yes, the New York Times has repeatedly confirmed and reported on Iran’s enrichment of uranium to 60%.
Key NYT Reporting:

As early as April 2021: The NYT reported that Iran had started enriching uranium to 60% purity, describing it as “the closest the country has ever come to the level needed for a weapon.”
Ongoing coverage (2024–2026): Multiple articles and interactive features detail Iran’s production and stockpile of uranium enriched to 60%, citing IAEA data. Examples include:
Reports on Iran’s stockpile reaching hundreds of pounds/kilograms of 60% enriched uranium (e.g., ~970 pounds / ~440 kg as of mid-2025).
Interactive graphics showing the growth of the 60% enriched stockpile from 2021 onward.
Post-strike analyses in 2025–2026 discussing the fate of the near-weapons-grade (60%) material.


The NYT consistently frames 60% enrichment as a major escalation — highly enriched uranium with no credible civilian justification and a short technical step from weapons-grade (~90%). This aligns with IAEA reports and has been a central topic in their coverage of Iran’s nuclear program, sanctions, and conflicts.

[funk51]

What part of the below screams "might" to you?

Try to use your own words, no pictures or video are necessary, unless you have a link that refutes the following.  I even threw in one of your lefty sites to make you feel comfortable.

          Just more of your one sided propaganda bullshit. In your eyes Trump can do no wrong, he puts on an UFC event unprotected outside, yet you and he {trump} argue that a well protected billion dollar  bunker  AKA a ballroom is necessary for future events. what is wrong with this picture. And what gives you the right to tell me how to respond. Try to use your own brain for a change, not staying true to the MAGA party line. Maybe Jesus trump will heal you. one can only hope.

[chaos]

What part of the below screams "might" to you?

Try to use your own words, no pictures or video are necessary, unless you have a link that refutes the following.  I even threw in one of your lefty sites to make you feel comfortable.

It's all fake bullshit outrage because it's Trump. Where were these same crybabies when Obama was blowing up schools and innocent people? LOL, they were silent, because they have their poor little emotions manipulated by the media. Sissies.

[Grape Ape]

          Just more of your one sided propaganda bullshit. In your eyes Trump can do no wrong, he puts on an UFC event unprotected outside, yet you and he {trump} argue that a well protected billion dollar  bunker  AKA a ballroom is necessary for future events. what is wrong with this picture. And what gives you the right to tell me how to respond. Try to use your own brain for a change, not staying true to the MAGA party line.

What the fuck are you talking about?

I gave you data from the NYT, the AP, and the IAEA itself.  THE FUCKING IAEA.

How is that one sided?

Just admit you have no idea what you're talking about.

We are talking about uranium and your response is UFC and ballrooms.

[funk51]

What the fuck are you talking about?

I gave you data from the NYT, the AP, and the IAEA itself.  THE FUCKING IAEA.

How is that one sided?

Just admit you have no idea what you're talking about.

We are talking about uranium and your response is UFC and ballrooms.

   

                                               It's known as D.A.R.V.O....

[chaos]

What the fuck are you talking about?

I gave you data from the NYT, the AP, and the IAEA itself.  THE FUCKING IAEA.

How is that one sided?

Just admit you have no idea what you're talking about.

We are talking about uranium and your response is UFC and ballrooms.

Consider your windows licked.