Trump = Winning

[illuminati]

is such a good system the Brits  gave it to some of their ex-colonies, in the name of fairer representation, but not to themselves

Yep - Typical of the ruling class Brits - Complete bunch of self serving Khvnts
Who should be eliminated.

[illuminati]

perhaps but it doesn't explain why two thirds of you voted against changing your voting system in 2011

Same 2/3s that believed the China Virus lies & propaganda & took the T.E.Vaccines 

[The Gov]

It's so easily Triggered & upset is Fag.got Pedo Pete 

Now spelling & grammar on an internet board Trigger It - Great

Poor Pedo Pete has no life...

[illuminati]

Poor Pedo Pete has no life...

Please ensure you use the correct grammar & spelling
or it will get very triggered  😱

I hope you're not foreign/ older than 60/ & are taller than 5ft 6
As it will have hissy fit & likely a heart attack frothing at the mouth.
 

😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂

[illuminati]

doesn't explain why so many of you are resistant to changing your voting system   that your choice but it makes a Brit pushing the US to change its voting system look silly
Wasn't the vaccine Boris's great gift to the Kingdom?

Who's pushing for usa to change voting system ?
It was a suggestion to AG in our exchanges.

Go find someone else to try your stupidity on.
I'm already bored of it. 

[B_B_C]

How's pushing for usa to change voting system ?
It was a suggestion to AG in our exchanges.

Go find someone else to try your stupidity on.
I'm already bored of it. 

it may be boring but being asked a  (stupid to you perhaps) question does not preclude giving an intelligent answer - although I suspect you believe you already have

[LurkerNoMore]

it may be boring but being asked a  (stupid to you perhaps) question does not preclude giving an intelligent answer - although I suspect you believe you already have

Truth.  Now he is waiting for you to make his own argument for him as he can't articulate anything that remotely sounds comprehensible, let alone intelligent.

[B_B_C]

Truth.  Now he is waiting for you to make his own argument for him as he can't articulate anything that remotely sounds comprehensible, let alone intelligent.

perhaps if you were not so repetitively self righteous your argument might have more effect

[LurkerNoMore]

perhaps if you were not so repetitively self righteous your argument might have more effect

Facts are always self righteous.

[B_B_C]

Facts are always self righteous.

I did not expect you to try and prove the point made in my previous reply to you

[LurkerNoMore]

I did not expect you to try and prove the point made in my previous reply to you

I see now I had to. 

[LurkerNoMore]

Owned again

https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/fitch-downgrades-us-long-term-ratings-aaa-aa

Really?  You can only blame Trumpy and his retarded supporters for this then.  Who just got owned?  Oh yeah.... you. 
---

Fitch official confirms that January 6 Capitol riot was partially behind its controversial US downgrade

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=Fitch+official+confirms+that+January+6+Capitol+riot+was+partially+behind+its+controversial+US+downgrade

    A top official with Fitch Ratings said January 6 influenced its controversial downgrade of US credit.

    "[I[t just is a reflection of the deterioration in governance ...," the official told Reuters.

    The Treasury Department has harshly criticized Fitch's decision.

A top official with Fitch Ratings on Wednesday confirmed reports that the agency issued its controversial downgrade of US credit due in part to the violent January 6 Capitol riot.

"It was something that we highlighted because it just is a reflection of the deterioration in governance, it's one of many," Richard Francis, a senior director at Fitch Ratings, told Reuters of the agency's conversations with the Treasury Department.

Francis' comments confirm multiple reports that Fitch officials brought up the riot with Biden administration officials before announcing their surprise downgrade on Tuesday evening. Fitch's statement does not mention January 6, but it does argue that a broader "erosion of governance" compared to other peers supported knocking US credit to an AA+ standard.

The White House, Treasury Department, and a swath of economists have criticized Fitch's decision. The downgrade mirrors S&P's historic decision to downgrade US credit after the 2011 debt ceiling fight. Congressional Republicans and the White House were once again able to avoid default in June, but Fitch said the recurrent nature of filtering with default is simply too much to bear.

"I strongly disagree with Fitch Ratings' decision," Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said in a statement. "The change by Fitch Ratings announced today is arbitrary and based on outdated data."

Global markets sank on Wednesday as traders began to process the news. But many economists remain convinced that the larger US economy will be fine in the long run.

"The United States faces serious long-run fiscal challenges," Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, a noted critic of Biden's COVID stimulus, wrote on Twitter. "But the decision of a credit rating agency today, as the economy looks stronger than expected, to downgrade the United States is bizarre and inept."

The juxtaposition of Fitch's decision and January 6 became inadvertently apparent as soon as their decision was announced. News of former President Donald Trump's indictment related to his efforts to overturn the election broke just as Fitch's downgrade became public.
---

[illuminati]

it may be boring but being asked a  (stupid to you perhaps) question does not preclude giving an intelligent answer - although I suspect you believe you already have

My answer is & was who's pushing for the USA to change voting systems.
It was a suggestion offered to AG as to what his thoughts were on PR.

And it is now very boring to me 😊

[funk51]

   Trump 2024

[LurkerNoMore]

Well, that didn't work out.  Let's try it again.  Will this “new case” be anything like infrastructure week or healthcare plan or the wall someone else is paying for? Can’t wait.


Pssst....   the next one won't work either.
---
Trump Drops Georgia Lawsuit Over Grand Jury, Promises New Case
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=Trump+Drops+Georgia+Lawsuit+Over+Grand+Jury%2C+Promises+New+Case

Donald Trump’s lawyers signaled they may take fresh legal action in Georgia to head off what could be the former president’s fourth indictment in five months — this time over his attempt to reverse the outcome of the 2020 election in a crucial swing state.

His legal team has dropped a suit that sought to force a Georgia state judge to rule on Trump’s request to toss out evidence gathered by an Atlanta special purpose grand jury and to disqualify Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis from the probe. The move came three days after the judge denied the request to oust Willis.

While they didn’t agree with the analysis or ruling by Fulton County Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney, Trump’s lawyers wrote in a motion Thursday that “there are now other channels to seek judicial review” of the special grand jury and the ability of Willis “to continue forward” with the probe.

Willis has said she’ll make a decision this month on whether to ask a new grand jury to charge Trump and his associates. The special purpose grand jury that Trump is challenging was only advisory and lacked the power to indict. Trump already faces three other indictments, including two by Special Counsel Jack Smith and one by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg.

On Thursday, the Fulton County Sheriff’s Office said it will close streets around the courthouse for two weeks starting on Aug. 7 as a security measure.
---

[B_B_C]

  "CRAZY! My political opponent has hit me with a barrage of weak lawsuits, including D.A., A.G., and others, which require massive amounts of my time & money to adjudicate. Resources that would have gone into Ads and Rallies, will now have to be spent fighting these Radical Left Thugs in numerous courts throughout the Country. I am leading in all Polls, including against Crooked Joe, but this is not a level playing field. It is Election Interference, & the Supreme Court must intercede. MAGA!"

[illuminati]

Keep going Donald doing what you do
because if you stop the Politics Board will die & all the sycophantic
Pedo Pete Ballsack worshippers on her will have nothing to post about,
and that would be so heart breaking & disastrous for them.

They should be thanking you for keeping their minds occupied 24/7
 

[Primemuscle]

“IF YOU GO AFTER ME, I'M COMING AFTER YOU!” Trump wrote in all caps Friday afternoon on Truth Social.

[LurkerNoMore]

Who is he coming after? What's he going to do?  Sue them?     His lawsuits get swatted down  faster than you read about them.  $475M lawsuit against CNN?  Lawsuit against Hillary?  Lawsuit against New York Times?  Lawsuit against the FBI for the Mar-a-Lardo raid?   The various lawsuits regarding the stolen election <-- hahahaha?

What a joke.

[LurkerNoMore]

Oh look.... more facts and evidence to cause the know-nothings to meltdown.  The same man who would try to erase surveillance tapes is also the type of person who would destroy documents demanded in a subpoena.  Evidence of a desperation and guilt.

Cue in the denial, deflection, distraction, TDfS, off comment replies, and.... TV STATIC.   

---
More document trouble looms for Trump, this time over missing evidence in his New York fraud trial
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=More+document+trouble+looms+for+Trump%2C+this+time+over+missing+evidence+in+his+New+York+fraud+trial

This week, New York's attorney general gave notice that she is ready for Trump's October 2 fraud trial.  Buried in the notice was a threat: She may seek new penalties against Trump and the Trump Organization for the "spoliation" of evidence.  As one potential penalty, Trump's judge could draw an "adverse inference" from any AWOL documents.

At Mar-a-Lago, it's the documents he kept that got Donald Trump in trouble.

But in New York, the former president now faces the risk of new penalties for documents he allegedly failed to keep.

Buried in a "ready for trial" notice filed this week by New York Attorney General Letitia James is a warning: She may ask the judge in Trump's October 2 fraud trial to punish the former president for the "spoliation of evidence."

As defined under New York case law, "spoliation" is the intentional failure to preserve documents or other evidence for pending or reasonably foreseeable litigation.

Potential penalties for spoliation include fines and a contempt-of-court ruling. But a finding of spoliation can lead to still more serious consequences. It would allow a judge to hold any missing documents against the party that failed to turn them over.
The dreaded 'adverse inference' penalty

It's the dreaded "adverse inference" penalty, something Trump would not want to suffer in this high-stakes trial, as he fights a $250 million civil fraud lawsuit that seeks to run his company out of New York at great personal and financial cost.

If spoliation is proven, New York Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron could infer, in reaching his verdict, that any evidence the defendants kept from the attorney general would have been harmful to the defense.

"This would absolutely tip the scales in favor of the government," former New York Assistant Attorney General Kenneth Foard McCallion said of the potential impact of James proving Trump or his co-defendants withheld evidence.

---

[B_B_C]

At his arraignment on the 3rd August,  a federal magistrate judge warned Mr Trump:
“It is a crime to try to influence a juror or to threaten or attempt to bribe a witness or any other person who may have information about your case, or to retaliate against anyone for providing information about your case to the prosecution, or to otherwise obstruct the administration of justice.”

On the 4th August Mr Trump  declared:

    IF YOU GO AFTER ME, I’M COMING AFTER YOU






some political football

[Coach is Back!]

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/federal-judge-comes-out-swinging-against-doj-special-counsel-trump-classified-docs-case

[Skeletor]

Why did he make Pence his VP then?

[Primemuscle]

Oh look.... more facts and evidence to cause the know-nothings to meltdown.  The same man who would try to erase surveillance tapes is also the type of person who would destroy documents demanded in a subpoena.  Evidence of a desperation and guilt.

Cue in the denial, deflection, distraction, TDfS, off comment replies, and.... TV STATIC.   

---
More document trouble looms for Trump, this time over missing evidence in his New York fraud trial
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=More+document+trouble+looms+for+Trump%2C+this+time+over+missing+evidence+in+his+New+York+fraud+trial

This week, New York's attorney general gave notice that she is ready for Trump's October 2 fraud trial.  Buried in the notice was a threat: She may seek new penalties against Trump and the Trump Organization for the "spoliation" of evidence.  As one potential penalty, Trump's judge could draw an "adverse inference" from any AWOL documents.

At Mar-a-Lago, it's the documents he kept that got Donald Trump in trouble.

But in New York, the former president now faces the risk of new penalties for documents he allegedly failed to keep.

Buried in a "ready for trial" notice filed this week by New York Attorney General Letitia James is a warning: She may ask the judge in Trump's October 2 fraud trial to punish the former president for the "spoliation of evidence."

As defined under New York case law, "spoliation" is the intentional failure to preserve documents or other evidence for pending or reasonably foreseeable litigation.

Potential penalties for spoliation include fines and a contempt-of-court ruling. But a finding of spoliation can lead to still more serious consequences. It would allow a judge to hold any missing documents against the party that failed to turn them over.
The dreaded 'adverse inference' penalty

It's the dreaded "adverse inference" penalty, something Trump would not want to suffer in this high-stakes trial, as he fights a $250 million civil fraud lawsuit that seeks to run his company out of New York at great personal and financial cost.

If spoliation is proven, New York Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron could infer, in reaching his verdict, that any evidence the defendants kept from the attorney general would have been harmful to the defense.

"This would absolutely tip the scales in favor of the government," former New York Assistant Attorney General Kenneth Foard McCallion said of the potential impact of James proving Trump or his co-defendants withheld evidence.

---

But, but, but... Trump is a totally ‘innocent’ man. He has done nothing wrong.  It is the Biden crime family and the Deep State that is out to get him and put him in prison for 600 years.

It is a big kick to read Trump’s email campaign pleas for donations and recently, his whining and attacks on Truth Social. This is comedy at its highest. Sometimes, some things he puts out are so completely asinine that they are ironically funny while at the same time they are an incredibly sad commentary on the absolute gullibility of the MAGA folk… some of which are Getbig’s most outspoken of Trump’s defenders.

[illuminati]

But, but, but... Trump is a totally ‘innocent’ man. He has done nothing wrong.  It is the Biden crime family and the Deep State that is out to get him and put him in prison for 600 years.

It is a big kick to read Trump’s email campaign pleas for donations and recently, his whining and attacks on Truth Social. This is comedy at its highest. Sometimes, some things he puts out are so completely asinine that they are ironically funny while at the same time they are an incredibly sad commentary on the absolute gullibility of the MAGA folk… some of which are Getbig’s most outspoken of Trump’s defenders.

Its all Orange Man Bad & Russia's fault - 100% it is.

👊🏻  👍🏻



😂🤣😂🤣😂