Trump = Winning

[loco]

Yes, you have a point in regard to too many dollars chasing too few goods.  But that applies to things like the housing market.  But the people affected by this are not the lower class and (guessing) half of the middle class.

But then there's this too which affects the poor and middle class:

Rents are rising faster than wages across the country
"Rents jumped 30.4% nationwide between 2019 and 2023, while wages during that same period rose 20.2%, according to a recent analysis from online real estate brokers Zillow and StreetEasy."
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/rent-cost-us-2024-housing-national/

[Soul Crusher]

1984 MONDALE LIKE BLOWOUT COMING 

http://www.newsweek.com/betting-average-has-trump-ahead-harris-first-time-since-september-1964807

[LurkerNoMore]

1984 MONDALE LIKE BLOWOUT COMING 

http://www.newsweek.com/betting-average-has-trump-ahead-harris-first-time-since-september-1964807

I predicted weeks ago that whoever wins will win by a landslide.  It won't be a close election.

[Moontrane]

I predicted weeks ago that whoever wins will win by a landslide.  It won't be a close election.

I didn't see that post, but I agree. 

Trump by an EC landslide.

[LurkerNoMore]

I didn't see that post, but I agree. 

Trump by an EC landslide.

Either Trump or Harris will win by a landslide.  This neck to neck thing that is being talked about, I just don't see it.

[Grape Ape]

Either Trump or Harris will win by a landslide.  This neck to neck thing that is being talked about, I just don't see it.

Kind of feel the same.

Hard to trust any polls.

It will either be another referendum against Trump, or a pendulum swing against the current Admin.

If it wasn't for white females, Trump wins every state.

[deadz]

Kind of feel the same.

Hard to trust any polls.

It will either be another referendum against Trump, or a pendulum swing against the current Admin.

If it wasn't for white females, Trump wins every state.

so true

[Primemuscle]

Yes there is a lot of gray, but there is also a lot of black and white.  I understand what Illuminati is saying, because inflation, the dramatic increased of goods and services, and the adverse impact it has had on millions of Americans is not a gray area. 

Similarly, there was a lot of gray area surrounding Covid, but there is now a lot of black and white.  We know masks don't work.  We know the vaccine doesn't stop the spread of the virus.  We know natural immunity is still a thing.  We know the vaccine mandates were anti-science and anti-liberty.  We know the lock downs were anti-science, etc., etc.

What is your definition of 'we'?

[Humble Narcissist]

Either Trump or Harris will win by a landslide.  This neck to neck thing that is being talked about, I just don't see it.

They need the ratings.

[Gym Rat]

What is your definition of 'we'?

you and the disgusting, disease festering caulks you suck...

[loco]

Either Trump or Harris will win by a landslide.  This neck to neck thing that is being talked about, I just don't see it.

The candidate whose voters believe will win by a landslide is at a disadvantage because many voters might not vote believing their candidate will win anyway.  This would benefit the other candidate.

Hillary was the most likely to win by a landslide.

Trump was supposed to beat Joe by a landslide.

The Red Wave in the midterm elections turned out to be a trickle.

So this neck to neck propaganda benefits both candidates because it's likely to get more people to get out and vote.

[B_B_C]

"The nuclear is the single biggest problem the world has. Not global warming, where the ocean will rise 1/8 of an inch in the next 500 years, you know these people are crazy. The biggest problem we have is nuclear warming, not global warming. And—and the nuclear people can’t have the nuclear. The nuclear is the power. You know I rebuilt our entire force and our nuclear is the best in the world and Russia’s right behind us."

[Grape Ape]

The candidate whose voters believe will win by a landslide is at a disadvantage because many voters might not vote believing their candidate will win anyway.  This would benefit the other candidate.

Hillary was the most likely to win by a landslide.

Trump was supposed to beat Joe by a landslide.

The Red Wave in the midterm elections turned out to be a trickle.

So this neck to neck propaganda benefits both candidates because it's likely to get more people to get out and vote.

I don't think that had anything to do with Trump v Biden or the Red Wave (or lack thereof).

Biden winning was a referendum against Trump, which was helped by Covid and manipulation of the lap top story.

SC overturing Roe vs Wade aborted the Red Wave

[Dos Equis]

You realize the first two years of Trump's administration was still Obama policies.

Yes, you have a point in regard to too many dollars chasing too few goods.  But that applies to things like the housing market.  But the people affected by this are not the lower class and (guessing) half of the middle class.  Housing prices is up with new home owners down because of the interest rates.  It is these interest rates that are making many potential home owners miss out because if the interest rate is over a certain percent, lenders like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will not finance the purchase.  It's not exactly the prices that are affecting new home ownership right now, it's the financing approval aspect. 

Also, regarding milk, eggs, etc.. there is no reason they have gone except for corporations to line their pockets with higher profits.  Why do you think grocery entities are posting record high profits now?  That is not true inflation.  That is price gouging.

There is no law or executive order Obama signed that had anything to do with Trump's economy. 

Inflation doesn't just affect the housing market.  It affects everything.  You cannot reasonably say that the cost of everything has gone up because "corporations" artificially inflated prices.  Prices have gone up because the cost of producing goods and services has dramatically increased.  There is nothing logical that supports the Kamala Harris contention that the inflation hurting millions of Americans is just price gouging.   

And even her proposed solution (government regulation) is never going to work at the federal level.  No way is the federal government going to control the price of goods and services being provided at the local level. 

[Dos Equis]

Kind of feel the same.

Hard to trust any polls.

It will either be another referendum against Trump, or a pendulum swing against the current Admin.

If it wasn't for white females, Trump wins every state.

I don't trust the polls for the most as they relate to Trump.  They were way off in 2016 and 2020.

[Dos Equis]

What is your definition of 'we'?

"We" is everyone with common sense who can read.  It would include all of us who now know, for example, that the six-foot social distancing rule was not based on science.  Same with the other examples I provided. 

[Dos Equis]

The candidate whose voters believe will win by a landslide is at a disadvantage because many voters might not vote believing their candidate will win anyway.  This would benefit the other candidate.

Hillary was the most likely to win by a landslide.

Trump was supposed to beat Joe by a landslide.

The Red Wave in the midterm elections turned out to be a trickle.

So this neck to neck propaganda benefits both candidates because it's likely to get more people to get out and vote.

I agree. 

[Dos Equis]

I don't think that had anything to do with Trump v Biden or the Red Wave (or lack thereof).

Biden winning was a referendum against Trump, which was helped by Covid and manipulation of the lap top story.

SC overturing Roe vs Wade aborted the Red Wave

He's right about propaganda.  I absolutely believe they manipulate poll numbers to drive turnout. 

[LurkerNoMore]

There is no law or executive order Obama signed that had anything to do with Trump's economy. 

Inflation doesn't just affect the housing market.  It affects everything.  You cannot reasonably say that the cost of everything has gone up because "corporations" artificially inflated prices.  Prices have gone up because the cost of producing goods and services has dramatically increased.  There is nothing logical that supports the Kamala Harris contention that the inflation hurting millions of Americans is just price gouging.   

And even her proposed solution (government regulation) is never going to work at the federal level.  No way is the federal government going to control the price of goods and services being provided at the local level.

Trumps policies didn't start taking affect until about the third year.  No one said anything about a law or executive order.

I can reasonably say everything has gone up because of corporate greed in the exact way that I did as it is relative to how it affects everyone.  The housing market doesn't affect everyone.  Not everyone is looking to buy a home at the moment and not everyone is renting at the moment.  But everyone is eating each day and buying necessities like toilet paper, etc.  The prices in this sector is inflated.  We see that because of a direct increase in corporate profits.  If the cost of goods had risen on par with the profits, then the profits would not be a record high.

And a 20% tariff on everything across the board is only going to add to the consumer burden.

[Coach is Back!]

Harris writes own ads and doesn’t even realize it ….

https://x.com/dc_draino/status/1844017818729333213?s=46

[loco]

Harris writes own ads and doesn’t even realize it ….

https://x.com/dc_draino/status/1844017818729333213?s=46

LOL   

Brilliant!

[Grape Ape]

Looks like the appellate court appeal on the Lelita James lawfare case went well for Trump.

Ruling not expected until after the election.

[Dos Equis]

Trumps policies didn't start taking affect until about the third year.  No one said anything about a law or executive order.

I can reasonably say everything has gone up because of corporate greed in the exact way that I did as it is relative to how it affects everyone.  The housing market doesn't affect everyone.  Not everyone is looking to buy a home at the moment and not everyone is renting at the moment.  But everyone is eating each day and buying necessities like toilet paper, etc.  The prices in this sector is inflated.  We see that because of a direct increase in corporate profits.  If the cost of goods had risen on par with the profits, then the profits would not be a record high.

And a 20% tariff on everything across the board is only going to add to the consumer burden.

Trump's policies took effect pretty much immediately after they implemented.  A POTUS enacts policies through signing legislation and executive orders.  So like I said, nothing Obama signed or ordered contributed to Trump's booming economy.  You cannot mention "Obama's policies" in a vacuum.  You have to point to some specific legislation or executive action that he was responsible for that directly contributed to the economy.   

Every abled bodied adult is owning, renting, or living with someone, so yes the housing market affects everyone.  Not every owner or renter is trying to move, but the housing market dictates their options, what they will pay, taxes, etc.   

We don't agree on why prices are inflated.  It's pretty clear to me that the cause is inflation, not some backroom conspiracy by "corporations" to artificially increase prices. 

Who has proposed a 20 percent tariff on everything across the board?  And how is the Kamala Harris remedy to inflation (federal price controls) going to work?

[Dos Equis]

Looks like the appellate court appeal on the Lelita James lawfare case went well for Trump.

Ruling not expected until after the election.

You would think so based on the questions, but you never know till the decision comes out.  I think this may end up in the U.S. Supreme Court anyway. 

[Primemuscle]

"We" is everyone with common sense who can read.  It would include all of us who now know, for example, that the six-foot social distancing rule was not based on science.  Same with the other examples I provided.

The six-foot social distancing may or may not only have been based on science, but the six-foot rule was also based on common sense. When someone has an air-born virus the closer they are to other people, the more likely they are to spread it to them.