Trump = Winning

[Coach is Back!]

90 minutes of "winning"   

This is what happens when you only have a "concept of a plan".

---
For Trump, 3 court losses in 90 minutes

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=For+Trump%2C+3+court+losses+in+90+minutes

Three different federal judges delivered legal setbacks and slap downs to President Donald Trump in the span of an hour and a half on Tuesday in a series of cases challenging controversial moves taken during the early days of his second term.

The rulings from judges in Washington, DC, and Washington state are the latest to pump the brakes on Trump’s agenda, underscoring the critical role courts have taken on for foes of Trump looking to frustrate his actions.

In DC, Judge Loren AliKhan issued a preliminary injunction that indefinitely blocks the administration from freezing federal grants and loans. The ruling expands an earlier block the appointee of former President Joe Biden issued last month shortly after the White House ordered the funding freeze.

“In the simplest terms, the freeze was ill-conceived from the beginning. Defendants either wanted to pause up to $3 trillion in federal spending practically overnight, or they expected each federal agency to review every single one of its grants, loans, and funds for compliance in less than twenty-four hours. The breadth of that command is almost unfathomable,” AliKhan wrote in her ruling.

She went on to say that the spending freeze was “irrational, imprudent, and precipitated a nationwide crisis.”

The issue of withholding federal funds has become a major flashpoint during the opening weeks of Trump’s second term, with other pending cases challenging the White House’s decision to suspend all foreign assistance.

Shortly before AliKhan issued her ruling, a separate jurist in the DC federal courthouse – Judge Amir Ali – ordered the Trump administration to pay foreign aid-related money owed to government contractors and nonprofit groups by Wednesday night, amid the legal fight over the freezing of USAID and State Department funds.

That order amounted to a legal reprimand after the plaintiffs in the cases repeatedly accused the administration of not complying with Ali’s earlier temporary restraining order that revived the funding contracts and grants that existed at the end of the Biden administration.

Ali – also a Biden appointee – rebuffed an earlier call by the challengers for the administration to be held in contempt for its alleged non-compliance. But he issued a new order requiring, in more forceful terms, that the government pay money owed to contractors and non-profits for work that had already been completed by the February 13 order.

Meanwhile, across the country in Washington state, a federal judge in Seattle issued a preliminary injunction on Tuesday that halts Trump’s executive order suspending refugee admissions and funding.

Judge Jamal Whitehead, who was also appointed by Biden, said that Trump’s “actions amount to an effective nullification of congressional will in establishing the nation’s refugee admissions program.”

“While the president has substantial discretion to suspend refugee admissions, that authority is not limitless,” the judge said.

Trump’s executive order, signed on his first day back in office, also directed a review of the refugee program and stated that resettlement should only resume if deemed to be in the “national interest” – a move critics argue is a de facto refugee ban.
Cases advance to next stages

The administration is facing at least 80 cases challenging a range of actions taken during Trump’s first few weeks back in office.

The plaintiffs behind those challenges have seen some success as they’ve pressed judges to issue emergency relief during the early stages of the litigation. But the White House, too, has scored some court victories in cases brought against the administration’s efforts to shrink the federal workforce and shutter the US’ foreign aid agency.

Many of the cases are finally getting a more thorough review by judges who are mulling whether to issue preliminary injunctions to block the contested government action. Such a decision is often the final trial court-level ruling issued in cases before they’re appealed by the losing side.

As AliKhan explained her reasoning for issuing the preliminary injunction in the funding freeze case, she said the nonprofits that brought the case were likely to succeed on their claims that the freeze was unlawful.

“The scope of power (the Office of Management and Budget) seeks to claim is ‘breathtaking,’ and its ramifications are massive,” she wrote. “Because there is no clear statutory hook for this broad assertion of power, Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits of this claim.”

And AliKhan noted that her earlier order temporarily halting the funding freeze was just that – temporary.

“The relief Plaintiffs now seek is a more durable version of the relief they sought then, when their members were on the brink of extinction,” she wrote. “In sum, Plaintiffs have marshalled significant evidence indicating that the funding freeze would be economically catastrophic – and in some circumstances, fatal – to their members.”

---

Oh we're back to this? You realize this is judicial posturing and there really isn't shit they can do about it...right? Take a civics lesson lol

[Rmj11]

The ruthless Republican Budget was passed today.

This budget lists:
•Medicaid cuts
•SNAP cuts
•Higher Housing Prices
•Tax breaks for the rich

It’s official. America is an Oligarchy.

Trump is winning but the American people are losing.

[Coach is Back!]

The ruthless Republican Budget was passed today.

This budget lists:
•Medicaid cuts
•SNAP cuts
•Higher Housing Prices
•Tax breaks for the rich

It’s official. America is an Oligarchy.

Trump is winning but the American people are losing.

Clueless…

[Rmj11]

10,000 Americans lost their jobs since Trump took office.

Not a single immigrant took them—Trump did.

You’ve been played, again.

Trump didn’t protect you. He fired you.

[Rmj11]

Clueless…

Trumptards acting like the last four years were unbearable. What exactly was so awful? Rebuilding the economy post-pandemic? Job growth? A functional government? Waking up without a fresh crisis every morning?

Trumptards in denial.

[Coach is Back!]

Trumptards acting like the last four years were unbearable. What exactly was so awful? Rebuilding the economy post-pandemic? Job growth? A functional government? Waking up without a fresh crisis every morning?

Trumptards in denial.

Like I said….clueless

[Humble Narcissist]

Trumptards acting like the last four years were unbearable. What exactly was so awful? Rebuilding the economy post-pandemic? Job growth? A functional government? Waking up without a fresh crisis every morning?

Trumptards in denial.

The only crisis I see is democrats scrambling to protect waste, fraud and abuse.

[Grape Ape]

Does this apply to the Trumpy Administration #1 as well?

In the context of Covid?  Yes.

I've said many times I believe he botched it with Covid.

But the mandates, most of the lies, etc, came from the Biden admin.

But what are you referring to specifically?

[Grape Ape]

Trumptards acting like the last four years were unbearable. What exactly was so awful? Rebuilding the economy post-pandemic? Job growth? A functional government? Waking up without a fresh crisis every morning?

Trumptards in denial.

The appearance of a daily "fresh crisis" is the result of a dishonest media.

What was awful?  A president's health being hidden from the public, an open border contributing to a massive financial burden, judicial lawfare, uncontrolled DEI, and a massive covid scandal.  Things any adult should be concerned with, regardless of party affiliation.

[Grape Ape]

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114068387897265338

Did Trump post those pics on truth social?

Never been there, but I know he doesn't drink.

[B_B_C]

Did Trump post those pics on truth social?

Never been there, but I know he doesn't drink.

either he or his account handler did
check the link
its short and worth checking out
everybody drinks but not everybody drinks alcohol

[Coach is Back!]

10,000 Americans lost their jobs since Trump took office.

Not a single immigrant took them—Trump did.

You’ve been played, again.

Trump didn’t protect you. He fired you.

Be specific....Government jobs

[deadz]

10,000 Americans lost their jobs since Trump took office.

Not a single immigrant took them—Trump did.

You’ve been played, again.

Trump didn’t protect you. He fired you.

Loony Lefty TARD! I hear Michigan is welcoming TARDS so GTFO!

[Rmj11]

Loony Lefty TARD! I hear Michigan is welcoming TARDS so GTFO!

Trumptard can't refute the facts.

[Rmj11]

The appearance of a daily "fresh crisis" is the result of a dishonest media.

What was awful?  A president's health being hidden from the public, an open border contributing to a massive financial burden, judicial lawfare, uncontrolled DEI, and a massive covid scandal.  Things any adult should be concerned with, regardless of party affiliation.

No. You're just in denial.

[deadz]

Trumptard can't refute the facts.

Only fact here is that you're a Karen. Trump, Trump, Trump...

[Primemuscle]

Be specific....Government jobs

Okay. How is this for specifics? Americans who held government jobs. Government employees who pay federal income tax, some of which are used to pay their wages. Government employees who were also consumers who boosted the economy.

[Grape Ape]

No. You're just in denial.

If you're capable of real conversation, back up your point with your own words, rather than just generalizing.

[Rmj11]

Only fact here is that you're a Karen. Trump, Trump, Trump...

Try refuting the facts.

[Rmj11]

If you're capable of real conversation, back up your point with your own words, rather than just generalizing.

You have no real argument, just deflection. Typical trumptard.

[Rmj11]

Trump announces that he is going to be freeing up our forests, and will be cutting down the trees down for lumbar.

In other words: Trump is moving forward with seizing national parks and public land and will be destroying them with deforestation.

Trump winning but the trumptards have lost.

[Grape Ape]

You have no real argument, just deflection. Typical trumptard.

I posted real, tangible examples.

That is not deflection.

Listen man, I've seen your posts, so I know I won't get anything of substance from you - you don't appear capable.  You just seem like an angry person who wants to be a dick online.

If you want to try, though, I can help you.

[Rmj11]

I posted real, tangible examples.

That is not deflection.

Listen man, I've seen your posts, so I know I won't get anything of substance from you - you don't appear capable.  You just seem like an angry person who wants to be a dick online.

If you want to try, though, I can help you.

Trump becoming the president is a real world example of what happens when the education system in your country is woefully inadequate.

[B_B_C]

.

"Contempt makes persuasion impossible — no one has ever been hated into agreement, after all — so its expression is either petty self-indulgence or cheap virtue signaling, neither of which wins converts."

[chaos]

I posted real, tangible examples.

That is not deflection.

Listen man, I've seen your posts, so I know I won't get anything of substance from you - you don't appear capable.  You just seem like an angry person who wants to be a dick online.

If you want to try, though, I can help you.

He's not even American, you're wasting your typing finger energy.