Author Topic: Trump = Winning  (Read 1219557 times)

Humble Narcissist

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 32594
Re: Trump = Winning
« Reply #7950 on: February 27, 2025, 12:25:43 AM »
^^^ Definitely not.

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61671
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Trump = Winning
« Reply #7951 on: February 27, 2025, 10:05:10 AM »
Okay. How is this for specifics? Americans who held government jobs. Government employees who pay federal income tax, some of which are used to pay their wages. Government employees who were also consumers who boosted the economy.

People get fired or laid off everyday in the real world. In business you eliminate unnecessary departments or positions in order to stay within a certain budget. It's no different in Government. I said years ago even before Trump was elected in 2016, you have to Government as if it were a business if you wanted it to be successful. I also said in order to that you need business people, not politicians or at least lifelong politicians. They don't know shit. They've never created a job, never had to stay with a budget to grow a bottom line, never signed an employee paycheck, never hired or fired (as a business owner or CEO) in other words, they are all but clueless to the workings of a business.

illuminati

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24899
  • The Strongest Shall Survive.- - Lest we Forget.
Re: Trump = Winning
« Reply #7952 on: February 27, 2025, 10:38:14 AM »
Okay. How is this for specifics? Americans who held government jobs. Government employees who pay federal income tax, some of which are used to pay their wages. Government employees who were also consumers who boosted the economy.

Where was your voice & outrage when folk were being laid off
& sacked over not taking a China Virus Vaccine - ??

Not a Fucking peep out of you then was there.  ::)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41777
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Trump = Winning
« Reply #7953 on: February 27, 2025, 10:50:41 AM »

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61671
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Trump = Winning
« Reply #7954 on: February 27, 2025, 11:10:37 AM »
90 minutes of "winning"   :D :D :D

This is what happens when you only have a "concept of a plan".

---
For Trump, 3 court losses in 90 minutes

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=For+Trump%2C+3+court+losses+in+90+minutes

Three different federal judges delivered legal setbacks and slap downs to President Donald Trump in the span of an hour and a half on Tuesday in a series of cases challenging controversial moves taken during the early days of his second term.

The rulings from judges in Washington, DC, and Washington state are the latest to pump the brakes on Trump’s agenda, underscoring the critical role courts have taken on for foes of Trump looking to frustrate his actions.

In DC, Judge Loren AliKhan issued a preliminary injunction that indefinitely blocks the administration from freezing federal grants and loans. The ruling expands an earlier block the appointee of former President Joe Biden issued last month shortly after the White House ordered the funding freeze.

“In the simplest terms, the freeze was ill-conceived from the beginning. Defendants either wanted to pause up to $3 trillion in federal spending practically overnight, or they expected each federal agency to review every single one of its grants, loans, and funds for compliance in less than twenty-four hours. The breadth of that command is almost unfathomable,” AliKhan wrote in her ruling.

She went on to say that the spending freeze was “irrational, imprudent, and precipitated a nationwide crisis.”

The issue of withholding federal funds has become a major flashpoint during the opening weeks of Trump’s second term, with other pending cases challenging the White House’s decision to suspend all foreign assistance.

Shortly before AliKhan issued her ruling, a separate jurist in the DC federal courthouse – Judge Amir Ali – ordered the Trump administration to pay foreign aid-related money owed to government contractors and nonprofit groups by Wednesday night, amid the legal fight over the freezing of USAID and State Department funds.

That order amounted to a legal reprimand after the plaintiffs in the cases repeatedly accused the administration of not complying with Ali’s earlier temporary restraining order that revived the funding contracts and grants that existed at the end of the Biden administration.

Ali – also a Biden appointee – rebuffed an earlier call by the challengers for the administration to be held in contempt for its alleged non-compliance. But he issued a new order requiring, in more forceful terms, that the government pay money owed to contractors and non-profits for work that had already been completed by the February 13 order.

Meanwhile, across the country in Washington state, a federal judge in Seattle issued a preliminary injunction on Tuesday that halts Trump’s executive order suspending refugee admissions and funding.

Judge Jamal Whitehead, who was also appointed by Biden, said that Trump’s “actions amount to an effective nullification of congressional will in establishing the nation’s refugee admissions program.”

“While the president has substantial discretion to suspend refugee admissions, that authority is not limitless,” the judge said.

Trump’s executive order, signed on his first day back in office, also directed a review of the refugee program and stated that resettlement should only resume if deemed to be in the “national interest” – a move critics argue is a de facto refugee ban.
Cases advance to next stages

The administration is facing at least 80 cases challenging a range of actions taken during Trump’s first few weeks back in office.

The plaintiffs behind those challenges have seen some success as they’ve pressed judges to issue emergency relief during the early stages of the litigation. But the White House, too, has scored some court victories in cases brought against the administration’s efforts to shrink the federal workforce and shutter the US’ foreign aid agency.

Many of the cases are finally getting a more thorough review by judges who are mulling whether to issue preliminary injunctions to block the contested government action. Such a decision is often the final trial court-level ruling issued in cases before they’re appealed by the losing side.

As AliKhan explained her reasoning for issuing the preliminary injunction in the funding freeze case, she said the nonprofits that brought the case were likely to succeed on their claims that the freeze was unlawful.

“The scope of power (the Office of Management and Budget) seeks to claim is ‘breathtaking,’ and its ramifications are massive,” she wrote. “Because there is no clear statutory hook for this broad assertion of power, Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits of this claim.”

And AliKhan noted that her earlier order temporarily halting the funding freeze was just that – temporary.

“The relief Plaintiffs now seek is a more durable version of the relief they sought then, when their members were on the brink of extinction,” she wrote. “In sum, Plaintiffs have marshalled significant evidence indicating that the funding freeze would be economically catastrophic – and in some circumstances, fatal – to their members.”

---

Let us know how that worked out.....

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/chief-justice-john-roberts-pauses-judges-order-trump-admin-pay-foreign-aid-contractors-midnight

IroNat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39206
  • There was a man called (blank)
Re: Trump = Winning
« Reply #7955 on: February 27, 2025, 11:38:33 AM »

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66457
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Trump = Winning
« Reply #7956 on: February 27, 2025, 01:26:02 PM »

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42398
Re: Trump = Winning
« Reply #7957 on: February 27, 2025, 02:56:19 PM »
People get fired or laid off everyday in the real world. In business you eliminate unnecessary departments or positions in order to stay within a certain budget. It's no different in Government. I said years ago even before Trump was elected in 2016, you have to Government as if it were a business if you wanted it to be successful. I also said in order to that you need business people, not politicians or at least lifelong politicians. They don't know shit. They've never created a job, never had to stay with a budget to grow a bottom line, never signed an employee paycheck, never hired or fired (as a business owner or CEO) in other words, they are all but clueless to the workings of a business.

Some politicians may not have business experience, but this is not true of all politicians or even a majority of them. The average age of newly-elected Congress members is 47, which is well into middle age. It stands to reason they had previous careers. In the 114th Congress, 231 members of the House of Representatives had/have occupations in business or banking. There are 435 voting members in the House. This means more than half of them have business experience.

Thirty-three out of one hundred Senators had/have careers in business and/or banking. Only forty-nine of them had prior experience in politics and/or public service. This is not all or even the majority of politicians as you suggest. Only about half of all Senators fit your description of career politicians with presumably no business experience. Not just CEOs but many if not most employees who work in for-profit businesses play a role in growing the bottom line, working within a budget and hold positions which include job creation, signing paychecks, counseling, reviewing, hiring and firing staff.

BTW, the U.S. government is a publicly created and owned non-profit business and not one that is for profit. Politicians answer to all U.S. citizens, including those who bother to vote. A for-profit business’s primary goal is to generate financial profit. In the U.S. government’s primary responsibilities are to protect and serve the people.
   

illuminati

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24899
  • The Strongest Shall Survive.- - Lest we Forget.
Re: Trump = Winning
« Reply #7958 on: February 27, 2025, 02:59:06 PM »
Some politicians may not have business experience, but this is not true of all politicians or even a majority of them. The average age of newly-elected Congress members is 47, which is well into middle age. It stands to reason they had previous careers. In the 114th Congress, 231 members of the House of Representatives had previous occupations that fell under the “business or banking” category. There are 435 voting members in the House. This means more than half of them have prior business experience.

Thirty-three out of one hundred Senators had/have careers in business and/or banking. Only forty-nine of them had prior experience in politics and/or public service, not all or even the majority of politicians as you suggest. Only about half of all Senators fit your description of career politicians with presumably no business experience. Not just CEOs but many if not most employees who work in for-profit businesses play a role in growing the bottom line, working within a budget and have positions which include job creation, signing paychecks, counseling, reviewing, hiring and firing staff.

BTW, the U.S. government is a publicly created and owned non-profit business and not one that is for profit. Politicians answer to all U.S. citizens, including those who bother to vote. A for-profit business’s primary goal is to generate financial profit. In the U.S. government’s primary responsibilities are to protect and serve the people.
   


Where was your voice & outrage when folk were being laid off
& sacked over not taking a China Virus Vaccine - ??

Not a Fucking peep out of you then was there.  ::)

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42398
Re: Trump = Winning
« Reply #7959 on: February 27, 2025, 03:11:23 PM »

Where was your voice & outrage when folk were being laid off
& sacked over not taking a China Virus Vaccine - ??

Not a Fucking peep out of you then was there.  ::)

Nothing in my post suggests outrage over folks, (government employees) being laid off. This subject was not mentioned in either Coach’s or my post.

When did I ever say I was not bothered by the laying off or firing of folks who refused the COVID vaccine during the pandemic?

Why is it so difficult for you to read what is written and stay on topic in your responses?

illuminati

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24899
  • The Strongest Shall Survive.- - Lest we Forget.
Re: Trump = Winning
« Reply #7960 on: February 27, 2025, 03:15:23 PM »
Nothing in my post suggests outrage over folks, (government employees) being laid off. This subject was not mentioned in either Coach’s or my post.

When did I ever say I was not bothered by the laying off or firing of folks who refused the COVID vaccine during the pandemic?

Why is it so difficult for you to read what is written and stay on topic in your responses?


Why is it so difficult for you to admit anything- You were complaining about whats been
Going on - Show me where you ever Complained about job losses over the China virus
Vaccines??

I'll wait ..................

Why can't you read & understand & then answer Truthfully- Its totally beyond you.

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42398
Re: Trump = Winning
« Reply #7961 on: February 27, 2025, 03:17:34 PM »

Why is it so difficult for you to admit anything- You were complaining about whats been
Going on - Show me where you ever Complained about job losses over the China virus
Vaccines??

I'll wait ..................

Why can't you read & understand & then answer Truthfully- Its totally beyond you.

Why is it so difficult for you to stay on topic?

I will wait.

illuminati

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24899
  • The Strongest Shall Survive.- - Lest we Forget.
Re: Trump = Winning
« Reply #7962 on: February 27, 2025, 03:20:26 PM »
Why is it so difficult for you to stay on topic?

I will wait.

Go away - its about as interesting trying to converse with you nowadays
as it was Bianca Bhanky - Totally Pathetic the both of you.

All you ever do is deflection & evading answering.

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42398
Re: Trump = Winning
« Reply #7963 on: February 27, 2025, 03:40:24 PM »
Go away - its about as interesting trying to converse with you nowadays
as it was Bianca Bhanky - Totally Pathetic the both of you.

All you ever do is deflection & evading answering.

And all your ever post lately asks me, off topic, dumb and irrelevant questions. Then you complain when they are not answered. If and when you ask me something relevant that I feel warrants an answer, I will do so.   

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61671
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Trump = Winning
« Reply #7964 on: February 27, 2025, 04:17:07 PM »
Some politicians may not have business experience, but this is not true of all politicians or even a majority of them. The average age of newly-elected Congress members is 47, which is well into middle age. It stands to reason they had previous careers. In the 114th Congress, 231 members of the House of Representatives had/have occupations in business or banking. There are 435 voting members in the House. This means more than half of them have business experience.

Thirty-three out of one hundred Senators had/have careers in business and/or banking. Only forty-nine of them had prior experience in politics and/or public service. This is not all or even the majority of politicians as you suggest. Only about half of all Senators fit your description of career politicians with presumably no business experience. Not just CEOs but many if not most employees who work in for-profit businesses play a role in growing the bottom line, working within a budget and hold positions which include job creation, signing paychecks, counseling, reviewing, hiring and firing staff.

BTW, the U.S. government is a publicly created and owned non-profit business and not one that is for profit. Politicians answer to all U.S. citizens, including those who bother to vote. A for-profit business’s primary goal is to generate financial profit. In the U.S. government’s primary responsibilities are to protect and serve the people.
   

1. Once again you sound like a fucking know-it-all douchbag. You GD well WHO I'm talking about. You might be just as annoying as funk.

2. Cite your sources

3. You and the ones on the left that all for destroying this country DO NOT deserve to be spoken to with any diplomacy.

4. The ones that are against the government cutbacks either have zero business experiance or they're hiding something. Period

illuminati

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24899
  • The Strongest Shall Survive.- - Lest we Forget.
Re: Trump = Winning
« Reply #7965 on: February 27, 2025, 04:54:01 PM »
1. Once again you sound like a fucking know-it-all douchbag. You GD well WHO I'm talking about. You might be just as annoying as funk.

2. Cite your sources

3. You and the ones on the left that all for destroying this country DO NOT deserve to be spoken to with any diplomacy.

4. The ones that are against the government cutbacks either have zero business experiance or they're hiding something. Period


Good answers

He really does think he knows more than anyone else & is smarter  ::)

Its nigh on impossible to get any meaningful sense out of him nowadays.

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42398
Re: Trump = Winning
« Reply #7966 on: February 27, 2025, 07:49:36 PM »
1. Once again you sound like a fucking know-it-all douchbag. You GD well WHO I'm talking about. You might be just as annoying as funk.

2. Cite your sources

3. You and the ones on the left that all for destroying this country DO NOT deserve to be spoken to with any diplomacy.

4. The ones that are against the government cutbacks either have zero business experiance or they're hiding something. Period

The overall tone and the number of 'typos' in your reply suggests your ‘feathers have been ruffled’.

Why would I bother to cite my sources? You only believe what suits your agenda, as is evidenced in your posts.

Who is destroying the United States and that it is being destroyed is a matter of opinion.

I cannot control how you wish to speak to me. A choice to be undiplomatic reflects poorly on you, not me.
 


Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42398
Re: Trump = Winning
« Reply #7967 on: February 27, 2025, 07:56:21 PM »

Good answers

He really does think he knows more than anyone else & is smarter  ::)

Its nigh on impossible to get any meaningful sense out of him nowadays.

You and I differ on what we believe is meaningful and sensible.

Never have I said that I know more than others or am any more intelligent. If this is your assessment, then thanks. I appreciate the compliment.

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61671
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Trump = Winning
« Reply #7968 on: February 27, 2025, 08:24:22 PM »
The overall tone and the number of 'typos' in your reply suggests your ‘feathers have been ruffled’.

Why would I bother to cite my sources? You only believe what suits your agenda, as is evidenced in your posts.

Who is destroying the United States and that it is being destroyed is a matter of opinion.

I cannot control how you wish to speak to me. A choice to be undiplomatic reflects poorly on you, not me.

Sorry, I actually run a couple of businesses and speak into phone you Sanctimonious prick.


AbrahamG

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19650
  • #TeamFunk51 4 Life
Re: Trump = Winning
« Reply #7969 on: February 27, 2025, 09:57:48 PM »
Sorry, I actually run a couple of businesses and speak into phone you Sanctimonious prick.

I think Coach, if I may interject, that the "p" in prick should also be capitalized if you are capitalizing Sanctimonious.  ;D

Unrelated, but do you have any real world experience using BPC 157 or TB 500?

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33806
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: Trump = Winning
« Reply #7970 on: February 28, 2025, 09:56:10 AM »
I think Coach, if I may interject, that the "p" in prick should also be capitalized if you are capitalizing Sanctimonious.  ;D

Unrelated, but do you have any real world experience using BPC 157 or TB 500?

Overall it's a waste of money.  Good (only slightly) for shallow type joint issues - wrist, elbow, knee, CTS, etc..   Completely useless for any kind of deeper inflammation (shoulders, quads, etc..)

Grape Ape

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24806
  • SC è un asino
Re: Trump = Winning
« Reply #7971 on: February 28, 2025, 10:08:43 AM »
Overall it's a waste of money.  Good (only slightly) for shallow type joint issues - wrist, elbow, knee, CTS, etc..   Completely useless for any kind of deeper inflammation (shoulders, quads, etc..)

I took the pills, didn't do shit for me, but maybe I was asking too much- was hoping to heal a broken sesamoid bone faster (or at least the area around it).

Had a weird overall sense of well-being initially, but didn't notice anything when I went off after 4 months.

Gym Rat has had success with the injectable though, and Honkins claims it cured his GERD, and now is going to funnel 1000 cals of MCT oil a day.
Y

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66457
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Trump = Winning
« Reply #7972 on: February 28, 2025, 01:03:57 PM »
il Donaldo Trumpo
@PapiTrumpo
YUUUUUUUGE MISTAKE, LITTLE MAN!!!😎🇺🇸

https://x.com/PapiTrumpo/status/1895533193274802445

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42398
Re: Trump = Winning
« Reply #7973 on: February 28, 2025, 01:52:48 PM »
Sorry, I actually run a couple of businesses and speak into phone you Sanctimonious prick.

The error rate of speech to text on a mobile phone is 5%.

B_B_C

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2593
  • change is the lot of all
Re: Trump = Winning
« Reply #7974 on: February 28, 2025, 01:54:45 PM »
The error rate of speech to text on a mobile phone is 5%.

the pomposity rate is much higher
c