Author Topic: Trump = Winning  (Read 1612130 times)

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 68609
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Trump = Winning
« Reply #10450 on: Today at 04:46:38 PM »
Ok retard, trump has increased by billions (in a year) while biden made 30million in 4 years. Is influence peddling illegal?

Trumps traded that 40 times over in a single quarter. You are a clown. The guy robbed people you tard. He took money from other people via illegal acts like insider trading. Rug pulling is something else, it's more nefarious. He sold a phone he will never deliver. After people complained they changed the FAQs to say the phone may or may not be made at his discretion essentially. LOL.

His crypto platform is clearly bribe central. The guy is taking dinners with business leaders for 1 million dollars, took 6 billion from dell to pump there stock, didn't disclose the folks who were contributing to the ballroom, the list goes on and on.

I don't take you serious because you love a good cult. In two facets that I know of your like you are in a monolithic cult. You lack all ability to think for yourself.


I love how you are defending heinous acts, real christian stuff here. Hypocrite.

Two things:

1.  You are asking whether influence peddling is illegal?  Look at the facts I outlined, add to that the plethora of suspicious activity reports issued by numerous Biden banks, then ask yourself what the innocent explanation is for laundering millions of dollars through 20 LLCs to numerous family members who were not actually engaged in a business. 

2.  Again, you repeatedly use words you don’t understand, like “bribe” and “insider trading.”  Words mean things.  I know your compression skills are weak, but you should consider making an effort to understand precisely what those words mean and how they apply to President Trump.  (Hint:  they don’t.)

chaos

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 62678
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
Re: Trump = Winning
« Reply #10451 on: Today at 04:51:48 PM »
In theory yes.  But how many news outlets, late shows, etc are drying up due to declining viewership and low ratings?

The data shows something like 95% negative coverage by the national media, and that's not a reflection of how the population feels.
Two things:

1.  You are asking whether influence peddling is illegal?  Look at the facts I outlined, add to that the plethora of suspicious activity reports issued by numerous Biden banks, then ask yourself what the innocent explanation is for laundering millions of dollars through 20 LLCs to numerous family members who were not actually engaged in a business. 

2.  Again, you repeatedly use words you don’t understand, like “bribe” and “insider trading.”  Words mean things.  I know your compression skills are weak, but you should consider making an effort to understand precisely what those words mean and how they apply to President Trump.  (Hint:  they don’t.)
You guys realize you're trying to rationalize with window lickers right? One of them believes he's the smartest guy ever while continually posting links to studies/papers that prove himself wrong. The other two are in the depths of senility.
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 68609
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Trump = Winning
« Reply #10452 on: Today at 04:57:47 PM »
You guys realize you're trying to rationalize with window lickers right? One of them believes he's the smartest guy ever while continually posting links to studies/papers that prove himself wrong. The other two are in the depths of senility.


Oh I know.  I don’t expect him to actually try and understand the issues.  He’s a troll.  And a simpleton.  But he makes me laugh.   ;D

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 43781
Re: Trump = Winning
« Reply #10453 on: Today at 05:22:41 PM »
In theory yes.  But how many news outlets, late shows, etc are drying up due to declining viewership and low ratings?

The data shows something like 95% negative coverage by the national media, and that's not a reflection of how the population feels.

"Late (night) shows are not serious news outlets; they are entertainment. Why do you suppose so many of the late-night hosts are comedians? Did you know that 5 out of the 6 most prominent network and cable programs feature stand-ups or comedic actors. How the population feels is not particularly relevant. Folks who disagree with all the negative media coverage continue to access it. So, they either hear about it second hand or seek it out themselves.