A question is not an argument. I was following up on your "so-called president" comment. As I'm sure you know, a number of your cohorts have used that "so-called president" moniker to question whether Trump was legitimately elected president.
Yes, a question is an argument. Meanwhile, I answered your question and you invented a new answer that had no relation to anything I said... or any bearing on the topic of this thread. Textbook straw man argument.
Sessions did not lie and any reasonably intelligent person (who is not a hack), who listens to the context of the question and answer, along with the context of the questionnaire, can clearly see that.
Only a hack could come to this conclusion. Why did he recuse himself from russian probes?
As I said before in response to your same question about Flynn, I have no idea why he didn't tell the truth. What difference does it make?
Yeah, what difference could Flynn lying about seedy ties to Russia possibly make? It's not like people from both parties are calling for investigations or anything.
Meanwhile, you spent three posts asking me why I used the phrase "so-called"... in a thread about a republican refusing to investigate the so-called president's claims of voter fraud. But you're no a hack, are you?
Funny how your ability to read others' minds seems to come and go so conveniently.