You watched the Sessions clip and read the questionnaire and are unable to see the context of the questions and answer. That's too bad. Partisanship interfering with your objectivity.
No my question was just a question.
... that you invented an answer to which had no relation to anything I had posted previously or the answer that I had just given you.
YOU are the one who brought up Flynn, again. I could care less why he didn't tell truth. That's something important to you, not me.
Yet you are the one who said it's good that he was fired for lying... despite the fact that it's unimportant that he lied and no one should really care. That seems contradictory to me, but I'm sure you can pull out a made up definition for contradictory that has no relation to the one everyone else uses that will explain why it isn't.
I have not seen your posts. Did you create thread about it like you did with Flynn? Were your posts expressing concern about government spying on private citizens and the outrageousness of the leak by someone in the intelligence community to the media assuredly for partisan purposes?
Yet, once again, you are more than capable of reading my mind and telling me how I'd react in a different situation, yet somehow you can't even hazard a guess as to why Sessions and Flynn lied. And once again, when it's convenient, you manage to lose the ability to do something as rudimentary as look at a post that is less than 24 hours old.