Author Topic: Mike Mentzer - Discussion  (Read 418019 times)

kepler2008

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 454
Re: Mike Mentzer - Discussion
« Reply #375 on: April 30, 2017, 12:55:44 PM »


Disgusted

  • Expert
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13610
Re: Mike Mentzer - Discussion
« Reply #376 on: April 30, 2017, 12:58:40 PM »

FREAKgeek

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5722
  • Fan of the Golden Era
Re: Mike Mentzer - Discussion
« Reply #377 on: April 30, 2017, 01:57:49 PM »
looks good

Top pic I can see how anyone would be high on themselves. Bottom pic, you can see the lacking chest.

Mike was a smart guy. I think the real reason he quit was because he knew he lost. He knew he didn't have it to be Mr Olympia.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79210
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Mike Mentzer - Discussion
« Reply #378 on: April 30, 2017, 06:16:37 PM »
 :)

BSN

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2878
Re: Mike Mentzer - Discussion
« Reply #379 on: April 30, 2017, 11:33:08 PM »
Sometimes Mike impresses more in those semi-relaxed shots.. with that powerful look

BSN

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2878
Re: Mike Mentzer - Discussion
« Reply #380 on: April 30, 2017, 11:42:14 PM »
One of his favorite pose

jwb

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5804
Re: Mike Mentzer - Discussion
« Reply #381 on: May 01, 2017, 02:39:09 AM »
Mike was way better in 1976, 1977 and 1978 than he was in 1979 and 1980.

He was a shadow of his 1978 form in 1980.

BSN

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2878
Re: Mike Mentzer - Discussion
« Reply #382 on: May 01, 2017, 04:30:04 AM »
 8)

karasan

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1185
Re: Mike Mentzer - Discussion
« Reply #383 on: May 01, 2017, 10:16:15 AM »
If there would be no video images and only still pictures of Golden Age Bb'ers I would rank Mentzer a close second after Sergio...
His posing is so dramatic, those crazy forearms, triceps, cannonball delts and nice biceps, perfect waist...
Extended arm poses, vacuums, arms above head poses...
What is even more funny is, both Sergio's and Mentzer's posing seems flawless and dramatic in magazine pictures, but it was quite the contrary...

Nether Animal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13813
  • Team Mower Forever
Re: Mike Mentzer - Discussion
« Reply #384 on: May 01, 2017, 11:04:24 AM »
Perfect waist? He had notoriously wide hips, plus a weak chest. Disappears on some shots posted on the last page. Great bber but far from perfect

Henda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12215
Re: Mike Mentzer - Discussion
« Reply #385 on: May 01, 2017, 01:28:30 PM »
Had the same stupid tash and haircut forever, great physique in some shots but looked like he was an absolute jerk

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79210
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Mike Mentzer - Discussion
« Reply #386 on: May 01, 2017, 04:40:04 PM »
 :)

Thespritz0

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3529
Re: Mike Mentzer - Discussion
« Reply #387 on: May 01, 2017, 08:31:51 PM »
Had the same stupid tash and haircut forever, great physique in some shots but looked like he was an absolute jerk
^^
I don't know how old you are, but that was the style back then look at the group photos, there are many over 1/2 of the guys had those moustaches...

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79210
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Mike Mentzer - Discussion
« Reply #388 on: May 02, 2017, 07:44:20 AM »
 :)

BSN

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2878
Re: Mike Mentzer - Discussion
« Reply #389 on: May 02, 2017, 08:27:29 AM »
1979 MO

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79210
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Mike Mentzer - Discussion
« Reply #390 on: May 02, 2017, 08:32:30 AM »
 :)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79210
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Mike Mentzer - Discussion
« Reply #391 on: May 02, 2017, 08:45:17 AM »
 :)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79210
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Mike Mentzer - Discussion
« Reply #392 on: May 02, 2017, 03:52:26 PM »
 :)

pellius

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22827
  • RIP Keith Jones aka OnlyMe/NoWorries. 1/10/2011
Re: Mike Mentzer - Discussion
« Reply #393 on: May 03, 2017, 01:00:44 AM »
Perfect waist? He had notoriously wide hips, plus a weak chest. Disappears on some shots posted on the last page. Great bber but far from perfect

I was in my late teens early twenties when Mentzer was in his prime and the biggest thing during that time. He was the most influential bber to me and I followed and read every article about him and every article he wrote. As with all bbers, there were criticisms regarding his physique. A lot having to do with him taking first place in the heavyweight division at the 79 Olympia but losing the overall to Zane. The criticism mostly focused on the need to improved his conditioning and allowing his gut to sag more than once during the show.  A sagging gut is something everybody has when you let yourself relax. Arnold was especially good at always sucking it in. But look at some of the guys standing in the background. Waller and even Padilla had a bit of a pouch.

Anyway, never had it ever been mentioned that he had a wide waist during that time. Never. That was never an issue during his era when he actually competed. That came decades later and I don't know how it caught on. Just look at him straight on. Sure he didn't have a tinny tiny waist like Buchannan or that extreme taper like Olivia. But a wide waist? No way, you can pull a vacuum with a wide waist. Arnold had a wide waist. Tinnerino had a wide waist. Roger Walker, Ken Waller and Franco's waist was no more narrower than Mentzer.

Even his chest wasn't criticized as being sorely lacking. Mentzer at the time was considered almost perfectly proportioned. But someone along the way made the wide waist crack and it caught on and everybody just falls in line parroting someone else.


Nether Animal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13813
  • Team Mower Forever
Re: Mike Mentzer - Discussion
« Reply #394 on: May 03, 2017, 04:22:51 AM »
I was in my late teens early twenties when Mentzer was in his prime and the biggest thing during that time. He was the most influential bber to me and I followed and read every article about him and every article he wrote. As with all bbers, there were criticisms regarding his physique. A lot having to do with him taking first place in the heavyweight division at the 79 Olympia but losing the overall to Zane. The criticism mostly focused on the need to improved his conditioning and allowing his gut to sag more than once during the show.  A sagging gut is something everybody has when you let yourself relax. Arnold was especially good at always sucking it in. But look at some of the guys standing in the background. Waller and even Padilla had a bit of a pouch.

Anyway, never had it ever been mentioned that he had a wide waist during that time. Never. That was never an issue during his era when he actually competed. That came decades later and I don't know how it caught on. Just look at him straight on. Sure he didn't have a tinny tiny waist like Buchannan or that extreme taper like Olivia. But a wide waist? No way, you can pull a vacuum with a wide waist. Arnold had a wide waist. Tinnerino had a wide waist. Roger Walker, Ken Waller and Franco's waist was no more narrower than Mentzer.

Even his chest wasn't criticized as being sorely lacking. Mentzer at the time was considered almost perfectly proportioned. But someone along the way made the wide waist crack and it caught on and everybody just falls in line parroting someone else.



I said wide hips. His waist itself is actually fine, but the disparity between that and the hips is/was the knock on him, specifically.

BSN

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2878
Re: Mike Mentzer - Discussion
« Reply #395 on: May 03, 2017, 09:55:02 PM »
The problem is that the form of abdominals not help him too. Same for Coleman.

kepler2008

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 454
Re: Mike Mentzer - Discussion
« Reply #396 on: May 04, 2017, 12:57:04 PM »
In those ancient times, drugs showed very positive effects on those long and sharpened quadriceps.


NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79210
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Mike Mentzer - Discussion
« Reply #397 on: May 04, 2017, 03:19:33 PM »
 :)

The_Iron_Disciple

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6493
  • Team New Dad
Re: Mike Mentzer - Discussion
« Reply #398 on: May 04, 2017, 03:53:57 PM »
In those ancient times, drugs showed very positive effects on those long and sharpened quadriceps.




Perfection.

A damn shame Mike never won the Olympia.

NaturalWonder83

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11699
Re: Mike Mentzer - Discussion
« Reply #399 on: May 04, 2017, 04:52:50 PM »

Perfection.

A damn shame Mike never won the Olympia.
agreed
w