Author Topic: Training for decades,are you still re-inventing the wheel in the gym?  (Read 22244 times)

ratherbebig

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9997
  • if you got more than 10k you're gay
Re: Training for decades,are you still re-inventing the wheel in the gym?
« Reply #100 on: May 13, 2017, 02:48:25 AM »
1. im not sure intensity is necessary for growth. like i said, its possible the muscle grow, over time, because of being trained over and over and over again. somebody doing pullups 3 sets of 10 3 times a week at home over a 6 month period might very well build his back even though he not once went over 3 sets of 10 or added weight around his waist.

maybe that just works to a limit and after that, for additional growth, changes has to be made.

2. as for intensity being dangerous, the problems is that when youre sapped of strength and mental energy, form goes out the window and that is where the danger lies when youre no longer able to perform an exercise properly but rather is struggling to lift at any cost.

3. biggest i feel doms is doing something i havent done before (it doesnt even have to be intense) or doing something i havent done in a long time (again, doesnt have to be intense) so doms doesnt say anything about level of intensity. and then i get doms in legs, but not so much in back, even though i pushed myself very hard to failure in my back training. add to that that i feel doms in legs, but not more than last time even though i lifted more than last time.

doms is a very poor indicator IMO.


cephissus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7599
Re: Training for decades,are you still re-inventing the wheel in the gym?
« Reply #101 on: May 13, 2017, 02:52:00 AM »
i used to think i was crazy with all the blank stares i would get while talking about training.  now i have a little more respect for myself.

pellius

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22827
  • RIP Keith Jones aka OnlyMe/NoWorries. 1/10/2011
Re: Training for decades,are you still re-inventing the wheel in the gym?
« Reply #102 on: May 13, 2017, 02:53:58 AM »
but is DOMS the only thing that tells us to back off? a delayed reaction of sorts, whatabout the pain you went through while doing the training, isnt that too a way of the body to tell you that youre taking it too far, and with that there's risk of injury? this we're suppose to ignore and 'fight through' no matter what.

as for pullups always doing 8 and not doing 9 or 10 or 11 that doesnt make sense, UNLESS, the body grows for other reasons, maybe the accumulating effect of doing something regularly over a longer period of time, time under tension or other protocols.
very few seems to keep increasing in no of pullups or start wearing a weight belt, would it be correct to say theyre wasting their time?


I forgot to address the very important point you brought up in your first sentence. What about the pain you experience  while doing the actual activity?

Remember what your body tend to. Why is it easy for us to store an almost unlimited amount of fat yet so hard to build muscles. Because your body wants to save energy and storing energy and reducing your body's demand for energy is your body's strategy. Muscle, even at rest, has a metabolic cost. Blood supply, nutrients, oxygen.... Fat is just stored energy. Something your body likes. And another strategy is that it is much more comfortable to lay on the couch than do wind sprints. When you start making great physical demands on your body you better have a damn good reason. And your body is going to exact a price for that reason. Now if you convince your body that it will enhance your survival or do you some good then there are mechanism for that. You want to look attractive and alpha for the females. This motivates you and you get that drive and high, the adrenaline rush, that make you ignore the pain. But taken to far, when you are taking yourself to the absolute limit, then your body rebels.

The pain, the discomfort, your body experiences when performing an activity is simply a reaction to your body's propensity to remain at rest. The pain you experience after an activity is an indication that you pushed your body beyond what it is normally use to. This may stimulate an adaptive response. To prepare itself for future stress. But like anything, like the difference between getting a tan and getting sunburned, or developing a callous or a blister, you can exceed you body's ability to adapt to the new stress.

Just like in life. Some stress is good. Keeps you motivated and alive. Too much stress is bad and probably one of the main killers in our society today.

pellius

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22827
  • RIP Keith Jones aka OnlyMe/NoWorries. 1/10/2011
Re: Training for decades,are you still re-inventing the wheel in the gym?
« Reply #103 on: May 13, 2017, 03:06:11 AM »
1. im not sure intensity is necessary for growth. like i said, its possible the muscle grow, over time, because of being trained over and over and over again. somebody doing pullups 3 sets of 10 3 times a week at home over a 6 month period might very well build his back even though he not once went over 3 sets of 10 or added weight around his waist.

maybe that just works to a limit and after that, for additional growth, changes has to be made.

2. as for intensity being dangerous, the problems is that when youre sapped of strength and mental energy, form goes out the window and that is where the danger lies when youre no longer able to perform an exercise properly but rather is struggling to lift at any cost.

3. biggest i feel doms is doing something i havent done before (it doesnt even have to be intense) or doing something i havent done in a long time (again, doesnt have to be intense) so doms doesnt say anything about level of intensity. and then i get doms in legs, but not so much in back, even though i pushed myself very hard to failure in my back training. add to that that i feel doms in legs, but not more than last time even though i lifted more than last time.

doms is a very poor indicator IMO.



1. It just doesn't make sense. Doing something that's already easy over and over again isn't going to stimulate an adaptive response. Why should it?

2. Again, the problem is with form and not intensity. And your workouts should be brief so that you are not so physically exhausted that your can't perform relatively simple movements. Also, that's one of the reasons that, in general, machines are superior to free weights. You don't have to worry about stabilizing the weight or getting out of you groove.

3. Like Jones, I also try to be precise with my language. I was very specific to say that my intention was to subject my muscles to a stress it was UNACCUSTOMED to. I remember getting DOMS from bowling for the first time all night. These were movements my body was not accustomed to despite lifting for years. Problem with calves is that the movement is fixed. Raising my heels up and down. I can't change that. All I could manipulate was the intensity in which I raised my heels up and down.

It's not that DOMS doesn't say anything about intensity. It's DOMS doesn't say everything about intensity.

Vince B

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12985
  • What you!
Re: Training for decades,are you still re-inventing the wheel in the gym?
« Reply #104 on: May 13, 2017, 03:28:08 AM »
It is indeed quite similar. DOMS was the only way I could tell that I pushed my muscles beyond what it was used to.  But there's one glaring and exceedingly important difference. Being fully recovered
before training that muscle again is an absolute necessity. The number of days was arbitrary. What mattered was that all soreness was gone and then adding a couple of more days for compensation. I've gone as long as 8 days before training again. Also, there is a huge and exceeding important difference in frequency and duration. You've advocated training 8 hours a day if it were possible. I trained at most every five days and I only did one set. Admittedly some of those "one set" took as long as ten minutes to complete but none of this set after set, day after day.

And it is unfortunate that you are not able to prove the gains that you made. But if you did it before, and you believe age is not a hinderance to muscle hypertrophy, you should be able to do it again. This would really put the matter to rest and shut the mouths, including mine, of your detractors.

All bobybuilders have to deal with the repeated bout effect. This happens when they wait for recovery and adaptation. My idea was to avoid that effect by retraining earlier. The people at Hypertrophy Specific Training state that research shows that protein synthesis doesn't continue after 48 hours. They advocate retraining after 36 to 48 hours. This is where I used my experience with pinch gripping. If I trained with only one rest day or more than two I didn't increase what I could lift. Using that protocol I set a new world record in one-handed pinch gripping hoisting 92.5kg or 203 pounds. I have a video of that competition.Training every third day was necessary to keep the muscle growing.

By the way, there is a threshold that one must exceed to cause hypertrophy. It is a pity that the word intensity
is used both for percentage of a maximum resistance lifted and the amount of effort expended. Even if only 80% intensity is required the effort required is still extreme to generate further hypertrophy.

Vince B

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12985
  • What you!
Re: Training for decades,are you still re-inventing the wheel in the gym?
« Reply #105 on: May 13, 2017, 03:35:07 AM »
You don't have a "theory." By scientific standards, you have a HYPOTHESIS.

You have to prove your hypothesis. We don't have to refute anything. And you said you have a Masters in Philosophy of Science, yet you cannot even differentiate between the terms "theory" and "hypothesis."


Is this your contribution to this debate? Semantics.😴

ratherbebig

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9997
  • if you got more than 10k you're gay
Re: Training for decades,are you still re-inventing the wheel in the gym?
« Reply #106 on: May 13, 2017, 04:32:33 AM »

Quote
. It just doesn't make sense. Doing something that's already easy over and over again isn't going to stimulate an adaptive response. Why should it?

well it still requires effort, just not maximum effort. maybe enough effort x number of times = accumulated effect over time.
isnt there numerous thoughts on how to make a muscle grow? time under tension. slow reps. low intensity but more sets. training for the pump etc etc why should we assume intensity is the only thing?

Quote

2. Again, the problem is with form and not intensity. And your workouts should be brief so that you are not so physically exhausted that your can't perform relatively simple movements. Also, that's one of the reasons that, in general, machines are superior to free weights. You don't have to worry about stabilizing the weight or getting out of you groove.

didnt you use to bounce while training calves? not sure how wise that is.

Quote
Raising my heels up and down. I can't change that. All I could manipulate was the intensity in which I raised my heels up and down.

i think there's a lot that can be done and i wouldnt sort them all under intensity. stretching during or after the movement. holding on top or bottom. explosive reps vs slow controlled reps. time under tension. rest between sets. no of sets or reps. progressive load.

Vince B

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12985
  • What you!
Re: Training for decades,are you still re-inventing the wheel in the gym?
« Reply #107 on: May 13, 2017, 06:30:52 AM »
well it still requires effort, just not maximum effort. maybe enough effort x number of times = accumulated effect over time.
isnt there numerous thoughts on how to make a muscle grow? time under tension. slow reps. low intensity but more sets. training for the pump etc etc why should we assume intensity is the only thing?

didnt you use to bounce while training calves? not sure how wise that is.

i think there's a lot that can be done and i wouldnt sort them all under intensity. stretching during or after the movement. holding on top or bottom. explosive reps vs slow controlled reps. time under tension. rest between sets. no of sets or reps. progressive load.


In logic something can be a necessary but not sufficient condition. Above a threshold re intensity is probably a necessary requirement for hypertrophy but it may not be sufficient for growth to occur. More time under severe tension is required. Lots of hard sets satisfies this requirement.

Nirvana

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5121
Re: Training for decades,are you still re-inventing the wheel in the gym?
« Reply #108 on: May 13, 2017, 08:46:31 AM »
Vince, Dr. Walczak told me himself that if you are training and eating properly and natural you will max out in about three years with about 80% of those gains coming within the first year. You can play with body composition and gain a bit or lose it bit just by eating by overall real qualitative and quantitative gains comes to a halt.

Your body does not want large muscles and for good reason. Muscles, even at rest, require constant metabolic support. Unlike fat, which is just stored energy and something your body always wants and has a seemingly limitless capacity to store, supporting muscle is a cost to the body and given the slightest reason it will get rid of it straight away. Put your arm in a cast and your muscles shrivel away. The fat will stay or even increase depending on caloric expenditure but muscle is gone. And you start to lose it as you get older no matter what you do. You talk such nonsense when you say age doesn't matter. Every human being that has ever existed that continues lifetime serious bbing has proven that. Robby Robinson and Tony Pearson are gifted bberings that have never lost the desire to train and have incredible, mindblowing, physiques FOR THEIR AGE. They are nothing like how they were when they were in their twenties and thirties.

You knew Dr. Walczak. This was his world. He worked with all the top bbers including supplying anabolic hormones right out of his office. I saw his cabinet with rows of ciba dbols tabs and vials of Organon Deca.

Again, he was a real, legit medical doctor and knew the human body very well and how it responds to  training, nutrition, and anabolic hormones. And he knew bodybuilding and real bodybuilders and what it took to get on stage and win. Arnold and Franco went to him for a reason.

He even said he could make you a champ. Who knows what would have happened if you took him up on his offer.
This has been my experience. I just train in a way that feels intense yet very safe. I don't care if I'm slightly bigger or smaller than some other nobody in the gym so no need to compile injuries.

SF1900

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 49682
  • Team Hairy Chest Henda
Re: Training for decades,are you still re-inventing the wheel in the gym?
« Reply #109 on: May 13, 2017, 08:49:52 AM »
This has been my experience. I just train in a way that feels intense yet very safe. I don't care if I'm slightly bigger or smaller than some other nobody in the gym so no need to compile injuries.

Have you ever tried the Bicep Supination Machine?
X

dj181

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 27878
  • Dog sees 🐿️
Re: Training for decades,are you still re-inventing the wheel in the gym?
« Reply #110 on: May 13, 2017, 08:53:11 AM »
Vince, Dr. Walczak told me himself that if you are training and eating properly and natural you will max out in about three years with about 80% of those gains coming within the first year. You can play with body composition and gain a bit or lose it bit just by eating by overall real qualitative and quantitative gains comes to a halt.

Your body does not want large muscles and for good reason. Muscles, even at rest, require constant metabolic support. Unlike fat, which is just stored energy and something your body always wants and has a seemingly limitless capacity to store, supporting muscle is a cost to the body and given the slightest reason it will get rid of it straight away. Put your arm in a cast and your muscles shrivel away. The fat will stay or even increase depending on caloric expenditure but muscle is gone. And you start to lose it as you get older no matter what you do. You talk such nonsense when you say age doesn't matter. Every human being that has ever existed that continues lifetime serious bbing has proven that. Robby Robinson and Tony Pearson are gifted bberings that have never lost the desire to train and have incredible, mindblowing, physiques FOR THEIR AGE. They are nothing like how they were when they were in their twenties and thirties.

You knew Dr. Walczak. This was his world. He worked with all the top bbers including supplying anabolic hormones right out of his office. I saw his cabinet with rows of ciba dbols tabs and vials of Organon Deca.

Again, he was a real, legit medical doctor and knew the human body very well and how it responds to  training, nutrition, and anabolic hormones. And he knew bodybuilding and real bodybuilders and what it took to get on stage and win. Arnold and Franco went to him for a reason.

He even said he could make you a champ. Who knows what would have happened if you took him up on his offer.

lots of blah blah here with no pictorial proof of anything

curious what you will say once you see my 4 week lat progress

p.s. I'm waaaaayyyyyy past my prime and I will do this gear free

Nirvana

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5121
Re: Training for decades,are you still re-inventing the wheel in the gym?
« Reply #111 on: May 13, 2017, 08:55:16 AM »
Have you ever tried the Bicep Supination Machine?
Would travel thousands of miles to kiss it and cry in it's presence.

The Ugly

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21287
Re: Training for decades,are you still re-inventing the wheel in the gym?
« Reply #112 on: May 13, 2017, 08:58:01 AM »
Stimmelate, don't annallate.

a_pupil

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3282
Re: Training for decades,are you still re-inventing the wheel in the gym?
« Reply #113 on: May 13, 2017, 09:22:26 AM »
i used to think i was crazy with all the blank stares i would get while talking about training.  now i have a little more respect for myself.

lol.

cephissus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7599
Re: Training for decades,are you still re-inventing the wheel in the gym?
« Reply #114 on: May 13, 2017, 12:10:04 PM »
Things that do NOT work for me as a Lifetime Natural:

High Volume, High Reps, Lengthy Workout Sessions, More than 3 or 4 days of lifting, Short Rest Periods Between Sets, Lighter Training, Pump Training, Explosive Training, varying exercises frequently (Muscle Confusion).


Things that DO work:

Low Volume 12 sets or so per workout usually Push in one session and Pull with Legs in the other, Lower to Mid Rep Range, 30- 1 hr max Workout Length, 3 Days a Week Lifting, Resting as long as needed to get the rep/weight range, Continual Progression with Weight, HEAVY training, sticking to the SAME exercises for long periods increasing weight or reps, increasing weight on exercises in small increments .5 to 1 lb


I wasted way too much time doing stupid routines that were regressive.  

Current and best Routine is this:

Monday:Bench Press-3 sets Reps=5, 6, 8   Reverse Pyramid first set Heaviest then reduce each by 10 percent in weight
           Dumbbell Shoulder Pres=5,6,8 Reverse Pyramid
           Barbell Front Raise= 3 sets of 12- Add weight once all 12 reps can be completed with given weight.
           Reverse Tricep Cable Pushdowns-3 Sets of 10- Add weight once all 10 reps are completed with given weight.

Wednesday: Squat-3 sets Reps=5, 6, 8   Reverse Pyramid first set Heaviest then reduce each by 10 percent in weight
                 Lying Leg Curl-3 sets of 12- Add weight once all 12 reps can be completed with given weight.
                 Barbell Row- 5, 6, 8   Reverse Pyramid first set Heaviest then reduce each by 10 percent in weight
                 Underhand Lat Pulldown- 3 sets of 12- Add weight once all 12 reps can be completed with given weight.
                 Barbell Bicep Curl- 3 Sets of 10- Add weight once all 10 reps are completed with given weight.
Friday:Repeat Monday

Then on the next Monday you will start with Squats and repeat the same M,W,F

Progression on the Reverse Pyramid sets are as follows: Only one set is moved up in weight each session.  For instance, 5,6,8 on your 8 rep set next session increase the weight. On the session after that, increase the weight on the 6 rep set. After that session, increase the weight on the 5 rep session. Repeat.

Wish I would have been training this way since starting.

Thanks for your post.  Clearly, one of the few people willing to talk honestly.  I recently cut back to three days as well.  Similar to you I alternate between just two workouts.

Been giving up a lot of the training principles I was too proud to let go of earlier.  I would think be surprised if my training moves even further in the direction you outlined.

FREAKgeek

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5722
  • Fan of the Golden Era
Re: Training for decades,are you still re-inventing the wheel in the gym?
« Reply #115 on: May 13, 2017, 02:31:57 PM »
Things that do NOT work for me as a Lifetime Natural:

High Volume, High Reps, Lengthy Workout Sessions, More than 3 or 4 days of lifting, Short Rest Periods Between Sets, Lighter Training, Pump Training, Explosive Training, varying exercises frequently (Muscle Confusion).


Things that DO work:

Low Volume 12 sets or so per workout usually Push in one session and Pull with Legs in the other, Lower to Mid Rep Range, 30- 1 hr max Workout Length, 3 Days a Week Lifting, Resting as long as needed to get the rep/weight range, Continual Progression with Weight, HEAVY training, sticking to the SAME exercises for long periods increasing weight or reps, increasing weight on exercises in small increments .5 to 1 lb


I wasted way too much time doing stupid routines that were regressive.  

Current and best Routine is this:

Monday:Bench Press-3 sets Reps=5, 6, 8   Reverse Pyramid first set Heaviest then reduce each by 10 percent in weight
           Dumbbell Shoulder Pres=5,6,8 Reverse Pyramid
           Barbell Front Raise= 3 sets of 12- Add weight once all 12 reps can be completed with given weight.
           Reverse Tricep Cable Pushdowns-3 Sets of 10- Add weight once all 10 reps are completed with given weight.

Wednesday: Squat-3 sets Reps=5, 6, 8   Reverse Pyramid first set Heaviest then reduce each by 10 percent in weight
                 Lying Leg Curl-3 sets of 12- Add weight once all 12 reps can be completed with given weight.
                 Barbell Row- 5, 6, 8   Reverse Pyramid first set Heaviest then reduce each by 10 percent in weight
                 Underhand Lat Pulldown- 3 sets of 12- Add weight once all 12 reps can be completed with given weight.
                 Barbell Bicep Curl- 3 Sets of 10- Add weight once all 10 reps are completed with given weight.
Friday:Repeat Monday

Then on the next Monday you will start with Squats and repeat the same M,W,F

Progression on the Reverse Pyramid sets are as follows: Only one set is moved up in weight each session.  For instance, 5,6,8 on your 8 rep set next session increase the weight. On the session after that, increase the weight on the 6 rep set. After that session, increase the weight on the 5 rep session. Repeat.

Wish I would have been training this way since starting.

looks like you're endowed with more fast twitch fibers than slow

pellius

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22827
  • RIP Keith Jones aka OnlyMe/NoWorries. 1/10/2011
Re: Training for decades,are you still re-inventing the wheel in the gym?
« Reply #116 on: May 13, 2017, 04:10:41 PM »
well it still requires effort, just not maximum effort. maybe enough effort x number of times = accumulated effect over time.
isnt there numerous thoughts on how to make a muscle grow? time under tension. slow reps. low intensity but more sets. training for the pump etc etc why should we assume intensity is the only thing?

didnt you use to bounce while training calves? not sure how wise that is.

i think there's a lot that can be done and i wouldnt sort them all under intensity. stretching during or after the movement. holding on top or bottom. explosive reps vs slow controlled reps. time under tension. rest between sets. no of sets or reps. progressive load.


Well, you seem pretty determined to make an argument against the importance of intensity for muscle hypertrophy. Of the three factors in training: frequency, duration and intensity; I believe that intensity is by far the most neglected factor. I presented my reasoning and will leave it at there.

You asked me what I did to put on four inches (3 permanent inches) on my calves in just under a year. I tried to give the best and most thorough response I could given the limitations posting on a message board. I did so reluctantly because it does get pretty involved and I consider it a dark period in my life. I was 37 years old, a grown ass adult, and the most important thing in the world to me at that time was building my calves. I was always self conscious about how skinny my calves were and was always trying to find new ways to improve them. But it didn't occupy my thoughts 24/7 like it did during that calf period. Something seemed to have snapped in me. I'm not sure what to make of it but I do have some qualms and really don't like to think about it. I was contacted by a writer from a major muscle mag about eight years ago who read my posts on IronAge to do an article on my calf training. I declined. I did reconsider and said I would do it only if my real name wasn't used. I think if I could do it then anybody could. There's nothing special about me and I was born with small calves and nothing I did before made zero difference. And I've been training formally nonstop since I was 12 years old. I really believed I could have help other people with the same problem. I just didn't want to be publicly associated with it. But that wasn't acceptable to the writer. Looking back it did indicate to me that in way I'm kind of ashamed at the immense effort I invested in such a trivial pursuit.

Anyway, I haven't looked at the link regarding my postings on IronAge and don't intend to but I think it will give you some ideal of the approach I took. I also tried to answer all your questions. It's pointless for me to continue to argue why I did what I did. I think I was pretty clear on my reasoning. But when all is said and done I did achieve something that few ever have. Trivial as it is.

Take it for what it's worth.

“Absorb what is useful, discard what is useless and add what is specifically your own”


― Bruce Lee, Bruce Lee's Wisdom for the Way


pellius

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22827
  • RIP Keith Jones aka OnlyMe/NoWorries. 1/10/2011
Re: Training for decades,are you still re-inventing the wheel in the gym?
« Reply #117 on: May 13, 2017, 04:18:12 PM »
In logic something can be a necessary but not sufficient condition. Above a threshold re intensity is probably a necessary requirement for hypertrophy but it may not be sufficient for growth to occur. More time under severe tension is required. Lots of hard sets satisfies this requirement.

Yes, I believe that completely. Intensity is a necessary but insufficient requirement to optimize muscle hypertrophy. Mentzer just went over board on intensity diminishing the importance of frequency and duration. The rub is how much? Three days a week? Six days? Two a days? One set? Ten sets? Fifty sets?

 

ratherbebig

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9997
  • if you got more than 10k you're gay
Re: Training for decades,are you still re-inventing the wheel in the gym?
« Reply #118 on: May 13, 2017, 04:27:07 PM »
thats fine.

i dont think its uncommon that people obsess, some over a lagging bodypart, grip strength, increasing their bench or just gaining as much mass as possible including going up in the middle of the night to drink shakes...

me personally i dont, but i do have an interest especially for parts of training others could care less about - grip strength, forearms, neck, calves...

Vince B

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12985
  • What you!
Re: Training for decades,are you still re-inventing the wheel in the gym?
« Reply #119 on: May 13, 2017, 05:38:01 PM »
What Pellius did to get his calves to grow:


"I wrote this long post on the Mentzer thread about how I was able to transform my calves after twenty years of fruitless training using every conceivable combination with various calf machines using just the one-legged calf raise that Jones said was perfect enough and why he never developed a calf machine.

Anyway, I didn't want the post to go to waste because it took me so long to write and might give some practical credibility to Jones' and HIT by an ordinary guy who had 13 7/8 inch calves until his mid thirties. I can email you a pic because I can't attach it here. I just got my first digital camera last week and have been photographing everything. I have a pic of my calves on my dsktop but it won't attach here. I think it exceeds the limit. The pic is of normal size but uses 1MB of space whereas the limit here is only 110KB.


Anyway here's the post that didn't make the locked thread  deadline:


Quote from: Max_Rep on August 07, 2006, 03:05:12 pm
Okay dude I'll try them. Do you hold the dumbell in the same hand as the leg you're training or the opposite hand?

Actually, to this day I can't do one strict rep with just my meager bodyweight of 195-200lbs so dumbells have never been necessary. I would do them at home with this huge dictionary that's about 8 inches thick. I put it between a doorway and use the frame edges to both balance and pull myself up for force reps and then push myself down (like doing an over head press) for negatives. I could write a book on all the variations but you really got to make them hurt. I'd just do one or two sets for each leg but each set would take almost five minutes. A typical set would start out with just the typical full range movement. All the way down but do a prestretch (as you slowly lower, just controlled not any of this super slow stuff, just before the full stretch you kind of do a bounce before coming back up. This is similar to throwing you hips out first before following with your arms when throwing a baseball. It's suppose to activate more fibers.) Then you do the whole force reps thing before you have to start pulling up your whole body but then push down against the top of the door frame for the negatives. When you can't control the downward portion of the movement you get to rest. Which means you do burns at the end. Just keep bouncing up and down at the bottom trying not to cry while psyching yourself up for the next rep. It's kind of rest pause except the rest part is the burns. So I would do positive failure, forced reps, negatives (pushing against the door frame) then maybe ten burns before I explode back up which  requires an assisted forced rep and then pushing back down for a negative and then repeat. I'd try to get about 10 of these burn/rest pause reps. Sometimes I couldn't do any more burns but would just stay in that stretched position wimpering like a girly-girl (not even a girl-man) before exploding back up. I was in the privacy of my own home so I didn't have to worry about how insane I looked. And I was free to say, "F**k, f**k, f**k, as I was in the stretching portion. And it's not just about doing forced reps, negatives, burns... you really have to make a concerted volitional effort. To take my mind off the pain of the burns I would use it to psyche myself up so I could explode for the rest pause reps. I looked at it as sort of when you hyper ventilate before extreme exertion. My hyper ventilation would be the burns. Burn, burn, burn, up and down, up and down, and then BOOM! explode to the top like your life depended on it. Forget about form at this point. Your muscles are too weak and exhausted to exceed tensile strength.

The thing is that the whole reason I started doing this was because I just gave up on calves. I wasn't going to waste my time at the gym doing them. I would just do a couple of one-legged sets at home just to keep tone and conditioning. It's only when I started to notice some change that it inspired me to take it more seriously. I first noticed veins before I started to measure them and found that they grew.

Don't be afraid to use your other feet for balance and to help you push up for forced reps and steady yourself for negatives. Eighty per cent of the time I 'd do just one set each because it just took so much out of me and since I didn't think I could duplicate that level of intensity for the next set I figure why bother.

Right now I just piddle with the seated calf machine at the gym and do one leg raises on the stairs leading to the stretching room at the 24HR on Crenshaw/PCH. I just do 15 reps for each leg and leave it at that. I don't train my calves with that intensity anymore because I don't want them to grow anymore because they're a bit out of porportion and people comment of them regularly. I can't tell you how odd it is to say that especially since I use to be so self-conscious of how skinny they were before. I measure them at 13 7/8 inches.

Now if I can only figure out a practical way to work with that type of intensity for the rest of my body.


Are you saying that with those monsters you can't do a one legged calf raise with you bodyweight?   I must be confused here or the sentence is off.  I would think after 3 inches of growth your strength would be through the roof compared to when they were under 14 inches.

Actually, that calf on the right in the picture looks like you stole it from Arnold.


I mean that I can't lock out fully, i.e., the full contracted position where you feel squeeze. I'm talking maybe the last quarter or even eighth of an inch. I certainly got stronger because I always kept track of reps and always strived for progression. When I first started I could only do about 5 strict reps without help. This surprised me because I would use the stack of the standing calf machine. But for some reason I could never get that full contraction when you are up on your toes like a ballerina. I had to help myself.

As I mentioned in a previous post I'm a bit under 6'2" and weigh 195-200lbs. I compete (Jiu-Jitsu) at 187.

I would train them twice a week. One set for each leg sometimes two (maybe twenty percent of the time). I would do toes slightly out one day and toes slightly in the other. Remember, the only reason I started training this way was because I decided to just give up on calves because if I couldn't make any improvement and after 20 years it was never going to happen. I did the one legged raise because Jones' said it was the perfect movement for calves and there was nothing he could do to improve upon it.  Hence, he developed no calf machines. Also, I could do it at home at my convenience and not take away from valuable gym time.

Having work on machines my whole life I was surprised at the difference bodyweight raises were. It did seem perfect. When I would go to the gym and do one leg raises on the standing calf it just wasn't the same. I don't know why. Anyway, I started to take it more seriously when I noticed a difference. I don't know how long it took because I really didn't pay much attention. I was just doing it for tone and conditioning and the feeling that even if a muscle doesn't respond you still should exercise it. I just remember once putting on my shoes and noticing a vein I never saw before. Im like, "What's the dealio-oh?" I then rummaged through my place to find a measuring tape and found that they grew almost a 1/4 inch.

If I get a chance I try to post some more things I did as I progressed. It's been a while since I've "bombed" them, at least two-three years, so I've forgotten a lot. But because of this thread some of the stuff are starting to come back. I think this might be helpful because nobody can say I had good genes for calves (13 7/8 inches after 20 years of training), or steroids (look at all the pros with bad calves) or implants (they're too bulgy and uneven) or synthol (ouch! plus you can see veins and  it doesn't look like a balloon.)

Again, measurement wise they're really not that big.  It's an illusion because of my skinny long ankles. A friend of mine use to say my calves were bigger than his but his measure 18 1/2 inches. Looked at alone they seem big but when you compare with someone else then it becomes obvious that though they appear more developed, size wise they're not that big.
 

Because so many factors are considered it's hard to tell if a certain variation, style or technique makes much of difference or not. One thing I started doing simply because I gave up on any hope of making progress (I figured, like Sisyphus, since I spent so much effort accomplishing nothing I decided that I'll devote a minimal amount of effort to accomplish the same thing -- namely nothing) was to start doing calves bare foot. After all, why bother "suiting up"  with shoes for something that now became a low priority. This gave me a noticeable difference in both the feel and application. One thing was that by kind of curling my toes it gave me more of a feeling of spreading out my calves outward instead of just the typical up and down contraction. This really made a difference doing burns. I remember Arnold once said that when standing on stage with his back to the audience he would try to grip the floor with his toes and spread his calves apart. Try to just stand on a level surface with both feet on the ground and then try to put most of the weight on one foot and grip the floor. Try to raise yourself but don't go into a full calf raise. Just raise yourself so that your heel is barely off the floor. Grip the floor with your toes and kind of play with the tension on your calves. Spread your toes as far apart as possible and really grip the floor and spread your calf apart. Hopefully you'll feel that sweet spot.

This really helped when doing the burns. Don't just mindlessly bounce up and down but try to grip the book, block, stair-step or whatever your standing on with your toes and spread your calves apart and keep the tension on as it burns."

Vince B

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12985
  • What you!
Re: Training for decades,are you still re-inventing the wheel in the gym?
« Reply #120 on: May 13, 2017, 06:24:07 PM »
After re-reading what Pellius did to gain several inches on his calves a question or two emerges.

First, he never mentioned Doms in that post. Now he tells us he used Doms as a way to tell if hypertrophy was stimulated. He used one of the DOMS principles! He might be a disciple afterall.

The second thing is Pellius accepted what Arthur Jones and Mike Mentzer wrote about recovery. So he waited for the muscle to stop being sore before retraining them. He literally never tried training them on every 3rd day as recommended by the DOMS method. So he has no clue if what I claim is true or not. All he knows is his method worked. Alas, he embraced the results of a small study indicating that the lads didn't grow until they became accustomed to training. That study 'proved' his protocols were correct and therefore my frequency was 'mistaken'. He said many unflattering things about me because he felt he was right and my method was wrong.

Very impressive result by anyone's standard. One wonders why he refuses to publish his story under his own name. Why not?

Al Doggity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7286
  • Old School Gemini
Re: Training for decades,are you still re-inventing the wheel in the gym?
« Reply #121 on: May 13, 2017, 06:34:51 PM »
Just curious if you had a concurrent increase in strength in the BP's that improved or do you think the improvement was due to more volume/frequency


Christian Thibaudeau wrote an article earlier this year noting how his body comp had changed over the years with various changes to his workout (and I'm sure diet) but that his bodyweight always seemed to remain about 215lbs
https://www.t-nation.com/training/genetic-limits-and-muscle-migration



Um...I guess I'll stick to the theme of the thread and try to make this answer as long and boring as possible. I'll have to explain where I was coming from in my training.


First, I'll talk legs.
I had tried to replace high volume with strength-focused training in previous stages (for diff bodyparts) and there was always a clear decline in strength for me. So, I never anticipated to be at my strongest if I wasn't essentially strength training. My legs and calves are stronger bodyparts (yes, black guy with strong calves! Who knew?), so that's part of the reason I always felt okay about skipping them if I had to.  When I started my "no excuses leg training" twice a week, I had two goals: improve shape while minimizing glutes  and also to be able to chase someone (like someone who attacked my family) for up to a mile. The latter one would be more beneficial than having a big ORM on squats. I cut out squats and extensions. I do timed sets of lunges, leg presses (since there usually isn't a wait for the leg press and I can monopolize it all I want), 5 minute high speed intervals on the treadmill,  and on the second workout on friday I incorporate alternating between a minute of standing calf raises with a minute of stiff-legged deadlifts.No more than 30 seconds rest between each set with the exception of the treadmill portions (75 seconds rest). Each workout lasts approx an hour. Since each set is timed, I don't use heavy weights for anything.

How did it effect my strength?: Like I said, I didn't expect it to increase strength, but it did. However, to gauge how much, you have to keep in mind that my leg training had been spotty up until last year. I actually found a thread I started here just shortly before I started doing this routine. I do squats periodically, just to see what's going on and on my most recent test, I was able to do 405 for 10 clean reps. That's not the highest weight, but considering I cut out power movements for legs, that's pretty decent. It's on the higher end of where I would squat when I was focusing on strength, but like I said, I never trained legs consistently, so it's not really an apples to apples comparison.  

Now, shoulders/chest:
I always felt like my shoulder development was a weak area and my bench press had not really progressed much for years. My max was 365 for 4 or 5 clean reps. It would fluctuate slightly depending on what I was doing. None of my shoulder lifts were anything to write home about, except for maybe dumbbell shoulder press. Throughout the time I've been weightlifting, I usually worked shoulders and chest on the same day and I always prioritized chest. I agreed with the theories that any pushing movement will benefit shoulders and that since shoulders are so small and involved in other upper body exercises, you could easily overwork them. Maybe about a year and a half ago, I started prioritizing shoulders. Twice a week, my workout looks like this: heavy shoulder press with dumbbells, heavy machine shoulder press,  heavy/moderate barbell raise, heavy/moderate flat bench, then pushing out 250 reverse grip shoulder presses and 250 lateral raises, regardless of how low I have to go in weight.

How did it effect my strength?:My weight on shoulder exercises increased significantly. I was able to get to two plates on seated military press and when I do lateral raises, my max weight is 65-70. The thing that is probably most interesting is that this did help me get past my bench press plateau, even though I hadn't been focusing on bench. I have a 1rm of 405 on
bench press, but another interesting thing is that I temporarily started focusing on bench presses and it seemed like my entire upper body sort of rejected it. My strength on chest exercises fluctuated workout to workout and I was getting easily fatigued on shoulder exercises.




pellius

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22827
  • RIP Keith Jones aka OnlyMe/NoWorries. 1/10/2011
Re: Training for decades,are you still re-inventing the wheel in the gym?
« Reply #122 on: May 14, 2017, 01:50:42 AM »
After re-reading what Pellius did to gain several inches on his calves a question or two emerges.

First, he never mentioned Doms in that post. Now he tells us he used Doms as a way to tell if hypertrophy was stimulated. He used one of the DOMS principles! He might be a disciple afterall.

The second thing is Pellius accepted what Arthur Jones and Mike Mentzer wrote about recovery. So he waited for the muscle to stop being sore before retraining them. He literally never tried training them on every 3rd day as recommended by the DOMS method. So he has no clue if what I claim is true or not. All he knows is his method worked. Alas, he embraced the results of a small study indicating that the lads didn't grow until they became accustomed to training. That study 'proved' his protocols were correct and therefore my frequency was 'mistaken'. He said many unflattering things about me because he felt he was right and my method was wrong.

Very impressive result by anyone's standard. One wonders why he refuses to publish his story under his own name. Why not?


Hah! Well, I wasn't going to click on the link and didn't but if you are going to stick in my face... lol! What was I suppose to do? Close my eyes and scroll through it? Sure brought back memories. That was ten years ago talking about a time ten years previous. Good times then -- lol!

A couple of things I want to clarify: In subsequence post (you may recall, Vince, that the discussion went on for pages and pages) I did indeed talk about DOMS. I related how on some occasions I couldn't even walk and had to take off work. The only way I could objectively determine that I had truly cause muscular damage which I believe at the time was the way to stimulate an adaptive response (why would the body adapt to a non stimulus?). Now this does not necessary mean that DOMS is the only way. It's just the only way I could actually feel empirically and objectively. Pain is pain and I can't fake it.

Also, when I talk about bouncing at the bottom stretch position I meant burns, partials, x-reps - whatever terminology is now in vogue. And unlike when I was doing full range movement: maximum stretch at the bottom, full contraction at the top; the partials were done in the stretch position but not the full stretch position. This is the portion of the set that went beyond the normal burn you feel when knocking out the reps. I had to really dig deep and just grit my teeth and burn away.

Also, the term "explode" to the top is a bit misleading. In actual practice there was no exploding. My muscles were far too weak and I couldn't raise my heel pass the flat footed position. I had to pull myself up gripping the top door frame to get to the top. The actual movement was very slow and deliberate.

And I already address the issue why I didn't want my real name associated with the article. After I had achieved my "goal" of developing my calves I didn't feel a sense of accomplishment. I had some serious qualms about the whole "journey". I questioned what kind of person I am. What kind of grown man gets so obsessed about the look of his lower leg muscle. I would be beyond embarrassed and humiliated if my father, mother; my brothers and sisters, knew about this. If they saw me alone at night in my apartment in complete darkness doing calf raises on a dictionary straining, moaning and groaning like a mad man. How vain, insecure and obsessed can a person be? Calves. I was dedicating my life to my calves. Jesus fucking Christ!

If an article came out and I actually was truthful as to what I did and the emotional commitment I made I couldn't bear the thought of someone in my real life discovering this dark secret about me.
That I was so obsessed with my calves. This episode made a lasting impression on me that one must not take his sanity for granted. That you can easily -- slowly but surely --  slip into deeper and deeper degrees of madness. You have to always have the ability to step out of yourself and just look at you and say, "What the hell are you doing?" 

 

Vince B

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12985
  • What you!
Re: Training for decades,are you still re-inventing the wheel in the gym?
« Reply #123 on: May 14, 2017, 02:07:06 AM »
Pellius, when I gained an inch on my calves and arms in one month I was running to the gym. It was exciting to be growing that fast trying something new. What you achieved in your quest was something to be proud of. Each 1/4 inch gain would have made the extreme effort worth it. No more chicken legs. I don't know of anyone else who achieved what you did. Get it documented to inspire others. Your hypertrophy journey is relevant to all bodybuilders.

pellius

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22827
  • RIP Keith Jones aka OnlyMe/NoWorries. 1/10/2011
Re: Training for decades,are you still re-inventing the wheel in the gym?
« Reply #124 on: May 14, 2017, 02:19:18 AM »
Although I don't really consider myself a bber in the strictest sense as I am not trying to get bigger. I am not trying to build my body. But after training consistently going on 45 years I do have some interest in my physique. I'm constant checking out my shoulder to waist ratio in clothes and constantly monitor my chest, delt and abs when shirtless. I never really look at my calves. It's not like I intentionally ignore them but more like I am indifferent to them. It's like a relationship in which one has grown apart and gone their separate ways. No anger or resentment. It just faded away.

I no longer train calves anymore. Well, I do do the seated calf machine. A movement that I think is absolutely worthless in developing the calves. But even that exercise I don't consider training my calves. It's just that since I am more concerned about physical conditioning than muscle and don't do cardio I like to keep moving constantly when training. So I do supersets on everything and walk back and forth across the gym floor between sets. After doing leg press movements I am so exhausted and out of breath that I need a break before I do stiff leg dead lifts. The seated calf just happens to be positioned in front of the barbell that I am going to use for deads. So I use the calf machine as sort of an active rest period. I just have one plate on and do half ass reps as I catch my breath. Also, I do a lot of stretching, but again, it's not for calves. I have heel spurs so I am constantly stretching the tendon at the bottom of my feet where the arch is.

Anyway, I was doing abs today at the gym and there is a mirror right there and in between the sets I looked in the mirror and noticed my calves. I guess all this calf talk brought it back to my mind. I looked at my calves and kind of chuckled and said to myself, "So there you are old friend. It's been a while."

In Franco Columbo's book, "Coming on Strong" written in the late 1970s (trying again to follow Arnold) he related how he use to talk to his muscles. He specifically mentioned his conversations with his calves. How he tried to egg them one. To encourage them to grow. I remember how strange I thought that was. I guess it isn't that strange at all -- wait a minute! It is strange!

Anyway, I realize it's been a full twenty years since my calves were once the most important thing in my life and occupied practically every waking hour and I even use to dream about them. I looked at them thinking about how they have fared over the last two decades.

The gym wasn't crowded today and my part of the gym was especially sparse so I decided to snap a pic for posterity. As an aside, I measured them when I got home and my left calf clocked in at 16 inches on the dot and my right calf stood at just a couple of notches under 16 and 1/4 inch.

So here it is, 5/13/2017, twenty years later in all it's glory. The Pellius calves twenty years later.