Never Forget... 9-11

[Simple Simon]

Re the pentagon - They could have released many images showing a plane but they didn't as their wasn't one - See these 2 images:-
https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/imagenes_sociopol/911_90_07.jpg
https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/imagenes_sociopol/911_90_11.jpg

ALL I am saying is that the public should wake up and use their common sense THEN try and find out why?
The towers & building 7 could not collapse at freefall speed into their own footprint from a few floors in the top 1/4 of the building burning for 90 mins
It takes HUGE skill to make buildings do this and yet 3 buildings collapsed in this way? Even the building "bethere" point us to fell over and very slowly as you would expect.

Building 7 was hardly damaged at all and yet it "fell down" - It was the home of the FBI - COINCIDENCE ??

The only part of the Pentagon hit and destroyed was the accountancy office where $2.3 trillion of public money had gone missing - COINCIDENCE ??

As George Bush later admitted "Money Trumps Peace" -

THE STRONGEST EVIDENCE FROM THE SCIENTIFIC WORLD AND NOT CONSPIRACY THEORISTS - Concluding the 3 buildings were the result of a controlled demolision
https://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/pdf/2016/04/epn2016474p21.pdf

so it seems you are of the opinion that building 7 was brought down with controlled explosion?

OK, now provide some evidence of that happening...

[Trev]

so it seems you are of the opinion that building 7 was brought down with controlled explosion?

OK, now provide some evidence of that happening...

Have done but here's another expert you won't watch being interviewed  -

[Eric2]

Can remember well, watching the events unfold. When building 7 came down, not one person in the room said that was right. Everyone stated the same thing. Why did that on fall? The way it fell looked staged, just like any other controlled building demo. After seeing this i then began to suspect our government was pulling strings.

[Simple Simon]

Can remember well, watching the events unfold. When building 7 came down, not one person in the room said that was right. Everyone stated the same thing. Why did that on fall? The way it fell looked staged, just like any other controlled building demo. After seeing this i then began to suspect our government was pulling strings.

I remember watching David Copperfield making the Statue Of liberty disappear, no way could that have been right...

[Simple Simon]

Have done but here's another expert you won't watch being interviewed  -

I skipped to 3.38 he said Tall buildings have never fell down because of fire.

Thats not true, why should I now watch any more?

apart from spouting the same shit as you why , bearing in mind he claims he was in building 7 didn't he confirm that he saw explosives and a controlled explosion.

He also claimed Rudy Gulliani was inside building 7 shortly before it was brought down?

How would he know that?

[Simple Simon]

as for building 7 brought down by explosives

Moreover, the smallest charge capable of initiating column failure "would have resulted in a sound level of 130 dB [decibels] to 140 dB at a distance of at least half a mile." Witnesses did not report hearing such a loud noise, nor is one audible on recordings of the collapse.

[Eric2]

I remember watching David Copperfield making the Statue Of liberty disappear, no way could that have been right...

Trying to be witty are we? Comparing something like building 7 falling to a David Copperfield trick is not witty. Most people reacted the same when building 7 went down. It just looked rigged, it still does, no matter how many times you view it.

[Simple Simon]

Trying to be witty are we? Comparing something like building 7 falling to a David Copperfield trick is not witty. Most people reacted the same when building 7 went down. It just looked rigged, it still does, no matter how many times you view it.

why was there no bang when they blew it up?

[Las Vegas]

Thank you, Trev.  That's fine.

[Twaddle]

Have done but here's another expert you won't watch being interviewed  -

This guy is no expert.  He is spewing nonsense. 

"Fire does not burn by itself, hot enough to compromise and melt steel." 

Uhhhh, yes it does.   

[rangerwil]

Trev posting videos from a guy that said the Sandy Hook school shooting was a hoax.
Alex Jones is a nut.

...and that fireman should loose his pension for running his mouth like that.

[Ropo]

Have done but here's another expert you won't watch being interviewed  -

What where? Please explain the difference between these two videos?

At first one you see what really happen, and second one shows you what morons want you to believe to be a truth.

[Ropo]

This guy is no expert.  He is spewing nonsense. 

"Fire does not burn by itself, hot enough to compromise and melt steel." 

Uhhhh, yes it does.   

What I find funny is the fact that claims of any given futile moron becomes the absolute truth in their minds no matter what they have seen in reality. If fire doesn't burn hot enough to compromise steel, where exactly the horse shoes grow?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_Age

[Trev]

I skipped to 3.38 he said Tall buildings have never fell down because of fire.

Thats not true, why should I now watch any more?

apart from spouting the same shit as you why , bearing in mind he claims he was in building 7 didn't he confirm that he saw explosives and a controlled explosion.

He also claimed Rudy Gulliani was inside building 7 shortly before it was brought down?

How would he know that?

Watch your own video showing the building that fell due to fire - wasn't a total collapse and a lot fell sideways as it would when natural

There were explosions heard as building 7 collapsed and many witnesses to these

[Trev]

This guy is no expert.  He is spewing nonsense. 

"Fire does not burn by itself, hot enough to compromise and melt steel." 

Uhhhh, yes it does.   

Watch rhe clip he is an expert and qualified to testify in court

[Trev]

What where? Please explain the difference between these two videos?

At first one you see what really happen, and second one shows you what morons want you to believe to be a truth.

Both show a building falling at free fall speed into its own footprint - Can only happen as a result of highly skilled demolition - FACT

[Trev]

Any doubters read this - 6 pages of expert scientific evidence

https://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/pdf/2016/04/epn2016474p21.pdf

[Twaddle]

Watch rhe clip he is an expert and qualified to testify in court

I watched the clip.  He is no expert.  He is a retired public servant that like to tell stories and reminisce about his glory days.  Trust me, he is no expert.  He is especially not an expert on fire science. 

[Twaddle]

Any doubters read this - 6 pages of expert scientific evidence

https://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/pdf/2016/04/epn2016474p21.pdf

This article is not peer reviewed, not scientific, contains no evidence.  When the article was originally published, even the publishers made the following disclaimer:

"This feature is somewhat different from our usual purely scientific articles, in that it contains some speculation. However, given the timing and the importance of the issue, we consider that this feature is sufficiently technical and interesting to merit publication for our readers. Obviously, the content of this article is the responsibility of the authors."

[Ropo]

Both show a building falling at free fall speed into its own footprint - Can only happen as a result of highly skilled demolition - FACT

But at the first one collapse takes about 13 seconds, and that is quite far from the free fall. Do you really think that when something happen first time in the history of mankind, it is automaticly impossible? What you are saying is "I haven't seen this before so it must be impossible" and that is quite stupid argument. How about some evidence about the skilled demolition? There is no explosions, no time for  planning etc. because no one know that WTC 1 & 2 will collapse at that day. They just take the opportunity, throw some bombs here and there and make that skilled demolition happen? Dear moron, nothing is a fact until you have proved it is 

[Trev]

I watched the clip.  He is no expert.  He is a retired public servant that like to tell stories and reminisce about his glory days.  Trust me, he is no expert.  He is especially not an expert on fire science. 

d

Watch again yes he is - qualified to testify

[Trev]

This article is not peer reviewed, not scientific, contains no evidence.  When the article was originally published, even the publishers made the following disclaimer:

"This feature is somewhat different from our usual purely scientific articles, in that it contains some speculation. However, given the timing and the importance of the issue, we consider that this feature is sufficiently technical and interesting to merit publication for our readers. Obviously, the content of this article is the responsibility of the authors."

Belie
Ve what you like. Is scientific and qualified

[Twaddle]

d

Watch again yes he is - qualified to testify

That does not make him a fire science or fire engineering expert.  The fact that he states, that fire cannot compromise steel, pretty much discredits his expertise. 

[Twaddle]

Belie
Ve what you like. Is scientific and qualified

It is qualified?  So it is a peer reviewed article?

[Trev]

But at the first one collapse takes about 13 seconds, and that is quite far from the free fall. Do you really think that when something happen first time in the history of mankind, it is automaticly impossible? What you are saying is "I haven't seen this before so it must be impossible" and that is quite stupid argument. How about some evidence about the skilled demolition? There is no explosions, no time for  planning etc. because no one know that WTC 1 & 2 will collapse at that day. They just take the opportunity, throw some bombs here and there and make that skilled demolition happen? Dear moron, nothing is a fact until you have proved it is 

13 seconds for a building to fall IS free fall speed. You can see with your own eyes there is no resistance from any of the lower floors

If you and bethere are correct why don't demolition experts now just light a few office fires high up in a building to make them collapse straight down in to their footprint  

Don't believe what corrupt politicians and their media tell you - use your eyes and common sense