Author Topic: Ronnie Coleman - 2000 was better than 2003  (Read 10741 times)

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: RONNIE 2000 was better than 2003
« Reply #50 on: March 17, 2018, 08:55:03 PM »
2000 BGP

Sexybeast777

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2736
Re: Ronnie Coleman - 2000 was better than 2003
« Reply #51 on: March 26, 2018, 02:16:09 PM »
he was truly massive, no homo

The Scott

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21607
  • I'm a victim of soicumcision!!
Re: Ronnie Coleman - 2000 was better than 2003
« Reply #52 on: March 26, 2018, 08:06:21 PM »
he was truly massive, no homo

He was (and remains) a massive shit stain of a liar.  I so look forward to reading of his demise from "natural" causes.  Probably something along the lines of  a congenital stupidity coupled with his decades of drug abuse.

Fuck Coleman.

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Ronnie Coleman - 2000 was better than 2003
« Reply #53 on: March 26, 2018, 08:35:49 PM »
He was (and remains) a massive shit stain of a liar.  I so look forward to reading of his demise from "natural" causes.  Probably something along the lines of  a congenital stupidity coupled with his decades of drug abuse.

Fuck Coleman.

Why do you hate him so bad? lol

Sexybeast777

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2736
Re: Ronnie Coleman - 2000 was better than 2003
« Reply #54 on: March 26, 2018, 09:42:55 PM »
He was (and remains) a massive shit stain of a liar.  I so look forward to reading of his demise from "natural" causes.  Probably something along the lines of  a congenital stupidity coupled with his decades of drug abuse.

Fuck Coleman.
no need to be so hateful, relax

The Scott

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21607
  • I'm a victim of soicumcision!!
Re: Ronnie Coleman - 2000 was better than 2003
« Reply #55 on: March 27, 2018, 05:05:27 AM »
no need to be so hateful, relax

And you?  No need to be so obsequious toward that pile of shit.  Do you do this because he's such a fake pile of shit devotee of Jayzus? 

Fuck Coleman to the hell he belongs in.  He's turning into what he really is.  A stinking pile of manlet.  He is so non-ambulatory that soon he'll be covered in flies. Good riddance.

The Scott

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21607
  • I'm a victim of soicumcision!!
Re: Ronnie Coleman - 2000 was better than 2003
« Reply #56 on: March 27, 2018, 05:08:03 AM »
Why do you hate him so bad? lol

There is absolutely nothing of merit in him. His life, such as it is/was/will be is a sham.  His physique was totally artificial and his IQ totally subterranean.  He's a typical fake christian.  A thankew Jayzus charlatan.

Royalty

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 30394
  • Mentzer is Alive
Re: Ronnie Coleman - 2000 was better than 2003
« Reply #57 on: March 27, 2018, 05:31:27 AM »
There is absolutely nothing of merit in him. His life, such as it is/was/will be is a sham.  His physique was totally artificial and his IQ totally subterranean.  He's a typical fake christian.  A thankew Jayzus charlatan.

Did you ever meet him?

Sexybeast777

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2736
Re: Ronnie Coleman - 2000 was better than 2003
« Reply #58 on: March 27, 2018, 05:58:12 AM »
And you?  No need to be so obsequious toward that pile of shit.  Do you do this because he's such a fake pile of shit devotee of Jayzus? 

Fuck Coleman to the hell he belongs in.  He's turning into what he really is.  A stinking pile of manlet.  He is so non-ambulatory that soon he'll be covered in flies. Good riddance.
stop the hate! you racist!

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Ronnie Coleman - 2000 was better than 2003
« Reply #59 on: March 27, 2018, 09:52:50 AM »
There is absolutely nothing of merit in him. His life, such as it is/was/will be is a sham.  His physique was totally artificial and his IQ totally subterranean.  He's a typical fake christian.  A thankew Jayzus charlatan.

I've met Ronnie before and he seems like a nice guy. No one lives a perfect life no matter what they do.

So, what is a real Christian?

nicorulez

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1674
  • Getbig!
Re: Ronnie Coleman - 2000 was better than 2003
« Reply #60 on: March 27, 2018, 04:20:22 PM »
There is absolutely nothing of merit in him. His life, such as it is/was/will be is a sham.  His physique was totally artificial and his IQ totally subterranean.  He's a typical fake christian.  A thankew Jayzus charlatan.

Wow you are butthurt aren't you. Are you a Dorian supporter that realizes that his hero would get slaughtered by the black manlet  ::) ::) ::). Only people who have such disdain for an athlete who they do not know and have never met are isolated, paranoid little men who live in mommy's basement jerking off to Playboys from the 70's and sucking on a pacifier. You are quite funny Scott....are you even from Scotland. Most Scottish folk I know are cool so I think you are a wannabe bitch.

The Scott

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21607
  • I'm a victim of soicumcision!!
Re: Ronnie Coleman - 2000 was better than 2003
« Reply #61 on: March 27, 2018, 08:45:50 PM »
Wow you are butthurt aren't you. Are you a Dorian supporter that realizes that his hero would get slaughtered by the black manlet  ::) ::) ::). Only people who have such disdain for an athlete who they do not know and have never met are isolated, paranoid little men who live in mommy's basement jerking off to Playboys from the 70's and sucking on a pacifier. You are quite funny Scott....are you even from Scotland. Most Scottish folk I know are cool so I think you are a wannabe bitch.

You're obviously retarded.  Now, go ask your mother what that means.  Sheesh, what a SFB.

The Scott

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21607
  • I'm a victim of soicumcision!!
Re: Ronnie Coleman - 2000 was better than 2003
« Reply #62 on: March 27, 2018, 08:47:57 PM »
I've met Ronnie before and he seems like a nice guy. No one lives a perfect life no matter what they do.

So, what is a real Christian?

You already know the answer.  And no, it sure as fook isn't me or you.  Coleman's a mental midget with barely enough brain power to breath and circulate his blood without having to think about it.

The Scott

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21607
  • I'm a victim of soicumcision!!
Re: Ronnie Coleman - 2000 was better than 2003
« Reply #63 on: March 27, 2018, 08:50:10 PM »
Did you ever meet him?

Nope. Did you ever meet a pedophile or murderer?  Get it?  There's enough out there by the manlet himself to inform anyone of Coleman's idiocy let alone his dependence upon drugs and his artificial faith.

And no, I am not picking on you.   I simply answered your question with a question of sorts.

The Scott

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21607
  • I'm a victim of soicumcision!!
Re: Ronnie Coleman - 2000 was better than 2003
« Reply #64 on: March 27, 2018, 08:51:10 PM »
stop the hate! you racist!

Oh STFU you pathetic phony. 

Sexybeast777

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2736
Re: Ronnie Coleman - 2000 was better than 2003
« Reply #65 on: March 27, 2018, 10:42:09 PM »
Oh STFU you pathetic phony. 
HOW DARE YOU!

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Ronnie Coleman - 2000 was better than 2003
« Reply #66 on: March 28, 2018, 08:01:26 AM »
You already know the answer.  And no, it sure as fook isn't me or you.  Coleman's a mental midget with barely enough brain power to breath and circulate his blood without having to think about it.

Which bodybuilders do you like the most?

Matt

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16693
  • YouTube FitnessByMatt
Re: Ronnie Coleman - 2000 was better than 2003
« Reply #67 on: March 28, 2018, 09:02:50 AM »
Wow you are butthurt aren't you. Are you a Dorian supporter that realizes that his hero would get slaughtered by the black manlet  ::) ::) ::).

Dorian and Ronnie were/are both 5'10.5".  Although Ronnie is possibly 5'9.5" or shorter today due to all the neck and back surgeries.

5'10"+ is hardly manlet status, nicorulez.