Yes, I have read Batcheldor's stuff and tried modified versions - I will not use the high doses some of the young bucks seem to perfer by the way.
I have found this kind of protocol produces very good results and much is kept.
Can you elaborate as to why you disagree with this kind of approach?
Thanks.
Yeah, it's pretty simple, his advice goes against basic standard knowledge when it comes to AAS...for example:
Most AAS need a few wks to get to the level where they are going to actively benefit you in a cycle. If you run lets say deca for 3-4 wks, which he often advocates, you haven't allowed enough time for your body to adjust and begin to use the compound efficiently.
He also advocates the same for test, running short cycles 4-6wks and then dropping the test and switching to something else. I'm sure this is perfect for someone who wishes their test levels to be bouncing around at completely unpredictable rates.
This guy is one of the so called "gurus" out there and I simply do not get it. He was a mod on another board for a while and I called him out on some of his ridiculous cycle recommendations and he never once offered anything to back up his claims. He really came off as some sort of self-proclaimed guru who in short did not know shit.
...that's my 2 cents.