Meh. Sounds pretty weak. Article 2(4)Article 2(4) has been described as the cornerstone of the UN Charter and one of the foundations of the modern international legal order. It states the following:“All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations.”While the article codifies the prohibition on the use of force, the UN Charter also provides two key exceptions for when force is justified. The first is the inherent right to self-defence under Article 51, and the second involves authorization by the UN Security Council under Chapter VII. Beyond these codified exceptions, controversial practices such as humanitarian intervention and the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine have emerged, though they lack formal recognition under Article 2(4). Despite Russia’s efforts to justify its actions under the UN Charter, leading scholars have characterized Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine as a “flagrant,” “unambiguous” and “egregious” violation of Article 2(4).https://warroom.armywarcollege.edu/articles/un-article-2-4/
You asked what specific (international law) has allegedly been violated not how strong it was. Maybe ask the U.N. for an opinion on its strength or if it has been violated.
King Trump says fuck you, cock sucking queer!
Renee Good blocks traffic, refuses orders, hits an ICE, and gets shot in the face. The ultimate FAFO. Sad story, but will fuel outrage for several weeks.
Well then, since you did the investigation and come to these conclusions, there is no need for further investigation of this situation at taxpayer's expense.You neglected to include that the ICE agent called Renee a "fucking bitch" after he shot her in the head. This certainly verifies his state-of-mind at the time of the killing.
FFS how much do you deliberately neglect to include in all of your Libturd Leftist propaganda & crap you post. Hypocrisy at its finest.
I heard that another officer made that comment. Regardless, it is a reasonable response to being struck by a vehicle driven by an agitator.
Nothing like a bunch of overstatements to try and make a point. I heard that another officer made that comment. Regardless, it is a reasonable response to being struck by a vehicle driven by an agitator.
Yes, but some were trying to frame it like it said it before.And, as you stated, might not be him, but if it was - it was a reaction to getting hit with a car after they told her to get out of the vehicle.
Where did you hear that it was a different officer that made the comment, "fucking bitch?" Either way, this is interesting because I believe that comment was captured on the cellphone video recorded by Ross.
From a commentator yesterday. The comment from the ICE officer who shot her was "whoah!" The other officer on the scene is apparently the one made to f-ing b comment. Not that it really matters.
I may or may not matter whether Ross said this, but if he did, it speaks to his state of mind whether he said it before or after shooting her. You may be right about who said "whoah." The video recorded by Ross indicates he said this a split second before the shots were fired. If the investigation leads to legal proceedings, this could matter a lot.
I don't think he said it, but whomever said it, said so after he was hit by her car and after he shot her. That person's state of mind after the officer was hit doesn't really matter. What matters is what the officer was reasonably perceiving before the shots were fired.
