Sure. Whatever. But we know every bodybuilder lies concerning his drug use.
I’ve spent time on a few occasions with Bill Pearl. One of the nicest and most charming men I’ve ever had the pleasure to know. He’s told me he has never used steroids of any sort. Total horseshit.
Just saying.
No matter, though. We’ll all believe what we want to.
Reeves wouldn't have to lie about any use because they weren't illegal. And Pearl admitted he did steroids in a Muscle & Fitness article back in the 80s.

I don't have a problem with steroids , I think they should be legal to purchase over the counter and used properly under a doctors supervision. But there was a time before steroids entered the equation , there is an established timeline of testosterone use then anabolics and Reeves is simply before this time. I would raise and eyebrow is Reeves was 6'1" 240lbs in 1947. He was 215lbs that can't be understated , he wasn't even the biggest guy back then!! You know your history , bodybuilders didn't start getting much heavier until 1960 and after. Larry Scott was 5'7" and 208lbs Reeves was 6'1" and 215lbs ! Scott was 6" shorter and just 7lbs lighter , obviously Scott's genetics pale in comparison to Reeves, so entertaining he was on test/anabolics they did absolutely nothing for him. Arnold around the same height as Reeves 25lbs heavier , See a pattern here?
When you take that into account along with the established timeline of drug use and Reeves being vehemently opposed to steroids , I think the answer is pretty clear. Like you we all believe what we want , some of us just but more research into what we believe