Hard to take someone who is 1 Kwon out of 3 serious but ok
There we go. This is what you've been jonesing to say all along and didn't, probably out of concern that it come off as too shallow and superficial. You literally gauge someone's credibility by their screen name. That tells me what I need to know about your powers of discernment.
I said from day one, I lean towards her being truthful because of a few reasons. No one I know of has fabricated a lie that includes a best friend of the accused being present. The risk is too great that Bros before Hoes would come into play. No, most people fabricating this story would say he pushed me in the room and we were alone. But I have said I don't know if this happened or not. My stance is, it should be looked into as part of the background investigation into a Supreme Court Nominee
You apparently never considered that the two men are not close or in contact and his 'friend' has no reason to have his back. He's actually a liberal self-employed writer and a Democrat, so politically, he's soundly on the Left, which is why you don't see CNN or MSNBC trashing him for being a Republican or a Trump voter - they already looked into that and found the answer didn't suit their narrative. The fact that the entire Left establishment and liberals on social media have closed ranks around her story before she's even had the chance to speak about it publicly tells any objective observer what they need to know about this: It's political and always has been.
This woman isn't very bright. She figured by adding someone else into the picture, it wouldn't simply be he-said, she-said. She never conceived that the guy wouldn't skip to her tune or sponsor her fabricated story just to avoid Me Too-style harassment, which he's surely going to be pilloried with soon now that she exposed him by name (which he never asked for). She's also highly calculating, taking a polygraph last month before this information was ever made public. She had lawyers on standby. She now has over $50,000 tax-free dollars by means of a gofundme campaign by triggered snowflakes with money who think she's somehow in some kind of danger as a result of her own malicious actions. And, lo and behold, once she's given the option to testify - which her lawyer confirmed just 2 days ago - she ran away and hid back under the rock she crawled out of. Now her lawyer just came out confirming she won't testify or even talk to investigators in her home state. Nothing short of an "FBI" investigation will do. You can't trust someone whose conditions change by the day and who can't explain why she doesn't even remember half the details of her story. Bottom line: If she was serious about her issue with Kavanaugh, she would've taken this to the police who had jurisdiction over the place where the event allegedly took place. Telling her paid therapist about it in private sessions or her husband - in 2012, not in 1982 or 1992 or 2002 - all point to a person with an ax to grind, rather than a real problem that no one would listen to (like Bill Clinton's victims, where he was the top law enforcement officer in their state when he committed his rapes and assaults, one of them barely a year before being elected as President).
She wanted a book deal. This whole thing was a publicity stunt, hence the timing (they've known since July).
