Kavanaugh's accuser from 38 years ago goes public

[Kwon3]

From Fox news

Ford provided The Washington Post the results of a polygraph examination conducted by a former FBI agent in August, which reportedly showed that she had been truthful in her allegations. According to the Post, Ford took the polygraph on the advice of her attorney, Debra Katz.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/19/polygraph-exam-taken-by-kavanaugh-accuser-christine-ford-comes-under-scrutiny.html

I should clarify what I said: The test was conducted by someone else, but her lawyer arranged it and handpicked the person conducting it on behalf of her client. The MSM was acting like Ford hired an independent expert versed in polygraph examinations. Now, that guy might be one such person, but we don't know who he is, so we can't gauge his credentials. I've seen interviews with professionals who've conducted 30,000 or more of these over their careers. Being former LE does not automatically mean expert in polygraph tests, and until we know what the questions were, it's not final. Polygraphs are not admissible as evidence in court.

[Kwon3]

The main question she asked was "who exactly is paying for this?"... once that got out of the way everything was true. Bloodsuckers.

That has yet to be answered. Multiple e-mails and calls about it have not been returned to Fox News (the other networks didn't ask).

The swamp is mobile.

Yeah, well, we have a guy in office who's not for sale, doesn't pander to anyone, has the cojones to tells the press he has no attorney general (even as the guy's still in office), and doesn't pander to pressure groups or lobbies because there's nothing in it for him. In short, he's uncontrollable - by the left or the right - and that makes him the sworn enemy of creatures of the system like this guy, who works at the state department and admitted some things that left me stunned on hidden camera:

Project Veritas has released the first installment in an undercover video series unmasking the deep state. The video features a State Department employee, Stuart Karaffa, engaged in radical socialist political activity on the taxpayer's dime, while advocating for government resistance. Stuart Karaffa is also a ranking member of the Metro DC Democratic Socialists of America (Metro DC DSA.)

Stuart Karaffa is just the first federal government employee that Project Veritas has filmed in an undercover series unmasking the deep state. More video reports are to be released soon.

[Pray_4_War]

Kirsten Gillibrand (D) having a full-blown meltdown at a press conference yesterday.

"I believe her because she's telling the truth."

Nice logic.  These people are stupid, dishonest and hell bent on regaining power even if they have to burn the country to the fucking ground.

[Kwon3]

"I believe her because she's telling the truth."

Nice logic.  These people are stupid, dishonest and hell bent on regaining power even if they have to burn the country to the fucking ground.

The way they see it, if you throw enough mud at something eventually it'll stick. What the Dems want is to make precedent with this case (they failed with Thomas in 1991) so that not only all future SCOTUS nominees will be discredited as the liberals see fit whenever they agenda doesn't perfectly align with the Left, but society in general will apply the same standard going forward, which basically amounts to a kind of social and legal death for men young and old of all races and backgrounds, no matter how innocent they are, if a woman decides their time is up. It's taken insanity to a whole other level.

If the Republicans lose the midterms and this bullshit succeeds, I'm betting on a civil war in under 5 years if they take the White House in 2020. Which works for us, since we're praying for it. 

[Princess L]

She keeps changing and adding to her demands 

Ford's lawyers outlined these demands, according to a source close to the process:

    Ford will not appear any sooner than next Thursday;
    No questions to be asked at hearing by any outside counsel -- only by Senators;
    Mark Judge must be subpoenaed;
    Kavanaugh would testify first, then Ford would testify, and Kavanaugh would have no opportunity to respond or rebut;
    The Friday deadline for her to provide written statement before the hearing would be waived;
    Provide adequate security;
    Only one pool camera in hearing room;
    Ford and Kavanaugh allotted the same amount of time to talk.

[polychronopolous]

When does he get voted in.

Enough of the silly bollocks nonsense
The democrats have tried everything to stop him
And now this with this woman who’s kept silent until
The 11th hour and none of her witnesses back her claims.

Says it all - End Of.

Mitch McConnell is pretty much the most powerful man at this point and he says it's going through.

Looks like he has the votes and he knows it.

McConnell: Kavanaugh will be on Supreme Court 'in very near future'



Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) on Friday said that Brett Kavanaugh will be on the Supreme Court "in the very near future" even as President Trump's nominee faces a sexual assault allegation.  

"You've watched the fight, you've watched the tactics, but here's what I want to tell you: In the very near future Judge Kavanaugh will be on the United States Supreme Court," McConnell said while speaking at the Values Voter Summit in Washington, D.C.

He added that Trump has "nominated a stunningly successful individual" and told conservatives not to get "rattled" because Senate Republicans are going to "plow right through it."

McConnell's comments come as a sexual assault allegation has thrown the timeline for a potential vote on Kavanaugh's nomination into limbo.



Republicans hold a narrow 51-49 majority in the Senate. They can only lose one GOP senator before they would need to lean on Democrats for help getting Kavanaugh confirmed.

Several Senate Republicans remain on the fence, but McConnell's comments indicate that he remains confident that Kavanaugh will get the 50 votes needed to be confirmed.

Republicans had wanted to get Kavanaugh confirmed by the end of the month, but that timeline has slipped after Christine Blasey Ford publicly accused Kavanaugh of pinning her to a bed and attempting to forcibly remove her clothes at a party in the early 1980s.



Kavanaugh has denied any wrongdoing.

McConnell's speech came as a 10 a.m. Friday deadline set by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) for Ford to let the panel know if she would testify at a Monday hearing came and went without an announcement.

Ford's lawyer told Judiciary Committee staff in an email Thursday that the Monday hearing and the Friday morning deadline for a prepared copy of her testimony was a "non-starter."  

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/homenews/senate/407761-mcconnell-kavanaugh-will-be-on-supreme-court-in-very-near-future%3famp

[Kwon3]

She keeps changing and adding to her demands 

Ford's lawyers outlined these demands, according to a source close to the process:

    Ford will not appear any sooner than next Thursday;
    No questions to be asked at hearing by any outside counsel -- only by Senators;
    Mark Judge must be subpoenaed;
    Kavanaugh would testify first, then Ford would testify, and Kavanaugh would have no opportunity to respond or rebut;
    The Friday deadline for her to provide written statement before the hearing would be waived;
    Provide adequate security;
    Only one pool camera in hearing room;
    Ford and Kavanaugh allotted the same amount of time to talk.

She's doing what all blackmailers do and changing the rules as she goes along only to back out when they're met in order to return with a new and even more unrealistic set of conditions until finally people give up and provide her with everything she wants. This is textbook manipulator behavior and unlike in most cases where it happens, this is playing out on the international stage. The foreign press is eating it up. America is coming off as a joke where the nominees to its highest court can be hamstrung or even disqualified on the basis of one unfounded allegation by an anonymous provocateur whose entire ramshackle case would be laughed out of any room or serious discussion were it not for the considerable weight and power of the country's Democratic political establishment propping it up for political gain. It's the most repulsive and irresponsible use of the nation's media organs and political machinery to inflate a hitherto nameless troll's wildly libelous and patently false fabrications to bring down a good man in the crosshairs of an establishment that failed to disqualify him through conventional channels. It's a political hit job the Russians would be envious of.

[Kwon3]

This is one of the most punchable faces I've ever seen. She reminds me of every uppity school administrator, obnoxious HR generalist, mouthy social worker, or bitchy airline reservation agent spouting off a long list of reasons why a flight's delayed while 40 people in the queue start griping and shoving each other in the background. Everything that's wrong with America's pampered class of privileged white liberal women now has a face. Funny part is I knew she'd look like this being a 2nd tier college professor at a liberal arts college in Norcal.

[Kwon3]

So this lying piece of shit somehow managed to con over 2200 braindead idiots into donating a whopping $114,662+ by means of a gofundme. That is on top of the $53,000 that was raised for her in a separate campaign days ago. Do you realize she just made close to 200K (and counting) for calling an innocent man a rapist?

America's gone completely insane. Nothing but a civil war who clean out the scum-sucking liberals who are destroying our country will suffice.

 
https://www.gofundme.com/help-christine-blasey-ford

[Dos Equis]

"I believe her because she's telling the truth."

Nice logic.  These people are stupid, dishonest and hell bent on regaining power even if they have to burn the country to the fucking ground.

This is one of the dumbest things I've ever heard. 

[Primemuscle]

This is why no one believes Ford and I'm not flippant when I say this.

1. It came at the time of Kavanaugh's confirmation vote

2. Throughout the entire hearing, leftists were using all kinds of excuses, they organized in chamber protests, one "I am Sparticus" moment, they insinuated he was a racist, they stalled as much as they can and I can't remember how many times they asked for more time, he should withdrawl, needed more background (even though there have been six checks)

3. 65 women came to Kavanaugh's defense

4. The two men she named as witnesses have flat out denied it

5. She's known leftist that's donated to Clinton, a part of the Womens march and vocally was against the wall and Trump.

6. ZERO witnesses whatsoever


No basis for an investigation AT ALL!

Maybe not, but what's the harm in investigating it if Kavanaugh is innocent, aside from the fact that it will be done using taxpayer dollars? What I question is the relevance of that situation today. Show me someone that didn't screwup when they were a teenager and I'll show you a saint. Unless there's proof that Kavanaugh continued to mistreat women throughout his adult life, one incident that happened 38 years ago is not relevant to his appointment to the Supreme Court, IMO.

If either Kavanaugh or Ford is lying, that is relevant because that is happening now and not almost 4 decades ago. Unfortunately, lying does seem like it's a big deal these days....almost as if it is expected. In my book, one of the worst things a person can do is lie about something.

[Straw Man]

So this lying piece of shit somehow managed to con over 2200 braindead idiots into donating a whopping $114,662+ by means of a gofundme. That is on top of the $53,000 that was raised for her in a separate campaign days ago. Do you realize she just made close to 200K (and counting) for calling an innocent man a rapist?

America's gone completely insane. Nothing but a civil war who clean out the scum-sucking liberals who are destroying our country will suffice.

 
https://www.gofundme.com/help-christine-blasey-ford

LOL

[Dos Equis]

Maybe not, but what's the harm in investigating it if Kavanaugh is innocent, aside from the fact that it will be done using taxpayer dollars? What I question is the relevance of that situation today. Show me someone that didn't screwup when they were a teenager and I'll show you a saint. Unless there's proof that Kavanaugh continued to mistreat women throughout his adult life, one incident that happened 38 years ago is not relevant to his appointment to the Supreme Court, IMO.

If either Kavanaugh or Ford is lying, that is relevant because that is happening now and not almost 4 decades ago. Unfortunately, lying does seem like it's a big deal these days....almost as if it is expected. In my book, one of the worst things a person can do is lie about something.

This is akin to the "what have you got to hide" when it comes to someone invading your privacy.  It's a BS position.  No offense to you. 

[Primemuscle]

This is akin to the "what have you got to hide" when it comes to someone invading your privacy.  It's a BS position.  No offense to you. 

It is what it is. I don't make these rules, society does.

Some Getbig posters are no better. They make baseless accusations about other members here and often several folks are instigated to pile on. Soon we have a something similar to a kangaroo court and a public flogging....all in the name of fun and games.

There is no such thing as privacy when you lead a public life. The citizenry won't allow it.

[Dos Equis]

It is what it is. I don't make these rules, society does.

Some Getbig posters are no better. They make baseless accusations about other members here and often several folks are instigated to pile on. Soon we have a something similar to a kangaroo court and a public flogging....all in the name of fun and games.

There is no such thing as privacy when you lead a public life. The citizenry won't allow it.

I agree public figures pretty much sacrifice their private lives, but that doesn't make this kind of intrusion right.  Nor should we take the "what have you got to hide" approach when it comes to an obvious politically motivated smear campaign. 

[Primemuscle]

I agree public figures pretty much sacrifice their private lives, but that doesn't make this kind of intrusion right.  Nor should we take the "what have you got to hide" approach when it comes to an obvious politically motivated smear campaign. 

Unfortunately, you and I can agree on these stupidities and yet we are powerless to do anything to change them. It can frustrate one to death.

[Soul Crusher]

It is what it is. I don't make these rules, society does.

Some Getbig posters are no better. They make baseless accusations about other members here and often several folks are instigated to pile on. Soon we have a something similar to a kangaroo court and a public flogging....all in the name of fun and games.

There is no such thing as privacy when you lead a public life. The citizenry won't allow it.

Obama is a gay fat chooming drug addict from parts unknown.  We have proven it numerous times

[Primemuscle]

Obama is a gay fat chooming drug addict from parts unknown.  We have proven it numerous times

Did you mean to reply to my post? Your reply is so off topic, it is hard to tell.

[Dos Equis]

Unfortunately, you and I can agree on these stupidities and yet we are powerless to do anything to change them. It can frustrate one to death.

Not entirely powerless.  Our votes matter. 

[Kwon3]

Obama is a gay fat chooming drug addict from parts unknown.  We have proven it numerous times

According to Straw Man, presumption of innocence is an anachronistic concept from a bygone era. He prefers the Chinese legal system, where prosecutors and judges are on the same side of the bench, government-appointed lawyers don't utter a word during the trial other than "Yes, your honor" or "No, your honor" and the defendant somehow has to produce proof to discredit what the secret police manufactured against the accused because it's politically necessary.

[Agnostic007]

Obama is a gay fat chooming drug addict from parts unknown.  We have proven it numerous times

 

[chaos]

Maybe not, but what's the harm in investigating it if Kavanaugh is innocent, aside from the fact that it will be done using taxpayer dollars? What I question is the relevance of that situation today. Show me someone that didn't screwup when they were a teenager and I'll show you a saint. Unless there's proof that Kavanaugh continued to mistreat women throughout his adult life, one incident that happened 38 years ago is not relevant to his appointment to the Supreme Court, IMO.

If either Kavanaugh or Ford is lying, that is relevant because that is happening now and not almost 4 decades ago. Unfortunately, lying does seem like it's a big deal these days....almost as if it is expected. In my book, one of the worst things a person can do is lie about something.

Epic contradictions....

[Soul Crusher]

Using Democrat libgaytranscommie standards it’s as valid as anything Ford claims vs Kananaugh.  But I got way more proof than that ditzy nutbag broad does

[Kwon3]

Using Democrat libgaytranscommie standards it’s as valid as anything Ford claims vs Kananaugh.  But I got way more proof than that ditzy nutbag broad does

The best video ever made about Obama, and posted three months before he was even elected. Fits him to a T.

[Kwon3]