Kevin speaks the truth why todays guys look like shit

[Humble Narcissist]

It's so odd. Vince obviously is intelligent but I dont understand why he hasn't spent the time to prove his theory.

It's called bro science.

[The Scott]

It's called bro science.

And it's lesser known trans-sister, "schmo science".

[Humble Narcissist]

And it's lesser known trans-sister, "schmo science".

And the two like to cum together.

[Bevo]

And it's lesser known trans-sister, "schmo science".

Bbers and gurus, the entire industry is built on bro science and schmoe science

[Vince B]

Please explain why anyone should give an intercourse.  I can do BB or DB curls, Preacher Bench Curls, incline DB curls, strict or cheat curls, hammer curls, reverse grip curls, high reps/low weight, low reps/high weight, Nautilus machine curls, ad nauseam.  It ain't rocket science but you know that.

It's up to you to "sell" your ideas, not I nor anyone else here.  I find you device to be over-complicated and unnecessary.  Apparently a great many others do too.

If that truth hurts perhaps it is because your skin is thin but your skull is thick?   You are far from stupid, but you're downright closing in on insufferable arrogance.

You haven’t used my machine so please refrain from any review of it.

[The Scott]

You haven’t used my machine so please refrain from any review of it.

Well now, aren't you a smart, talented, unique person in demand. 

You're not bitter.  You're real bitter.

[Vince B]

Well now, aren't you a smart, talented, unique person in demand. 

You're not bitter.  You're real bitter.

Not at all bitter, just fair minded and sensible.

[The Scott]

Not at all bitter, just fair minded and sensible.

Nope.  You are bitter.  You're not ignorant but you come off as not so much an asshole but a whole ass.  It happens to us all from time to time.  You don't do this all the time but you are definitely doing it where your curling device is concerned.   

[chaos]

You haven’t used my machine so please refrain from any review of it.

Your machine sucks and is overcomplicated. Useless tool from the mindless fool.

[Vince B]

Your machine sucks and is overcomplicated. Useless tool from the mindless fool.

I expect no less from you, Chaos, well done!

[Vince B]

Nope.  You are bitter.  You're not ignorant but you come off as not so much an asshole but a whole ass.  It happens to us all from time to time.  You don't do this all the time but you are definitely doing it where your curling device is concerned.   

Typical of Getbiggers you discuss and attack personalities instead of theories and machines.

[The Scott]

Typical of Getbiggers you discuss and attack personalities instead of theories and machines.

Typical of an "adult" playing at being a child.  If you think what I said is an "attack" then you really are a moron.  You are too feeble minded to do anything other than stick to your usual rote (look it up, kid).

Theories are just that.  Theories.  Must I provide a definition of the word "theory", kid? 

Your machine is quite complicated for what it does.  A DB or BB will more than suffice and it can be said with great certainty that Arthur Jones machines (yes, he had more than just a bicep curl machine) are far less (needlessly) convoluted than your "biceptual sybianator".

Jones was also a far better salesman than you. Given your apparent attitude here, you couldn't sell sperm flavored condoms and spermicidal BumGrease™  at a AIDS Awareness Orgy.

You bitter little manlet, you. 

[Humble Narcissist]

Typical of Getbiggers you discuss and attack personalities instead of theories and machines.

It would be easy for you to test your theory on others.  Why don't you do it?  Why don't you test your machine as well?

[Vince B]

Typical of an "adult" playing at being a child.  If you think what I said is an "attack" then you really are a moron.  You are too feeble minded to do anything other than stick to your usual rote (look it up, kid).

Theories are just that.  Theories.  Must I provide a definition of the word "theory", kid? 

Your machine is quite complicated for what it does.  A DB or BB will more than suffice and it can be said with great certainty that Arthur Jones machines (yes, he had more than just a bicep curl machine) are far less (needlessly) convoluted than your "biceptual sybianator".

Jones was also a far better salesman than you. Given your apparent attitude here, you couldn't sell sperm flavored condoms and spermicidal BumGrease™  at a AIDS Awareness Orgy.

You bitter little manlet, you. 

I talked to Arthur Jones in 1995. Interesting guy. He never built a biceps supinator but wrote about the desirability of such a machine because of the biceps having two insertions.

I am hardly trying to sell any of my gym equipment via the internet.

[Vince B]

It would be easy for you to test your theory on others.  Why don't you do it?  Why don't you test your machine as well?

I have been testing my training method on myself for the last 20 years. It works. That is sufficient for me.

[Humble Narcissist]

I have been testing my training method on myself for the last 20 years. It works. That is sufficient for me.

I actually trained with your hypertrophy method and just got sore elbows.  I am in my 40's though.

[hipolito mejia]

Will Kevin be back ?

[Griffith]

Barbells and dumbbells are all anyone ever needs.Some machines are good if injured or tired but nothing beats raw iron imo.

Only time I've ever injured myself in the gym has been on machines.

[chaos]

I have been testing my training method on myself for the last 20 years. It works. That is sufficient for me.

It's not sufficient for a scientific theory. If you were smarter, you'd know that.

[The Scott]

you enjoy thinking up stuff like this

I have a sense of humor and an ability to write instead of just type. It's not nearly as good as some here (most notably, Kahn.N.Singh) but it suffices. 

[Vince B]

It's not sufficient for a scientific theory. If you were smarter, you'd know that.

Science isn't interested in bodybuilding. Hope this helps.

[SF1900]

I have been testing my training method on myself for the last 20 years. It works. That is sufficient for me.

That’s because you’re an imbecile.

[Skeletor]

I have been testing my training method on myself for the last 20 years. It works. That is sufficient for me.

So after 20 years, what results have you noticed?

[Humble Narcissist]

So after 20 years, what results have you noticed?

Just look at the pics.  The training appears to build a lot of fat.

[FitnessFrenzy]

Typical of Getbiggers you discuss and attack personalities instead of theories and machines.

you have made personal attacks towards Vince Goodrum 100+ times, so brutal hypocrisy.