I haven't contributed much to this topic. However, whatever works has to be part of the complete theory of hypertrophy.
One of the factors is based on what Larry Scott and others found, namely aiming for a maximum pump. Larry trained
brutally hard and painfully. Burns and up and down the racks were what he did. He found that if he could pump his
arms bigger than ever then the next day they would be larger. He didn't use light weights to get his pump.
This 3 sets of 100 reps might give some results for a short time. Not so sure about long term. Of course the 'feeder' method here doesn't
say not to do other arm training. So I am not sure how any gains can be attributed to feeding the muscle.
Btw, Pellius seemed impressed with a 'new' method and was going to try it. Makes me wonder how that fits in with his making sure a
muscle recovers before training it again.
Years ago I started doing really high reps in the triceps pressdown. With 3 plates on the machine I got up to a maximum of 174 reps.
I did 100 reps with 4 plates. Neither time did those gruelling sets result in any larger arms. So I abandoned those high reps.
I do warm up sets up to 50 or so reps. But what makes my arms grow are the many sets with the maximum resistance. 5 or 6 sets.
Yeah, Vince, we were all anxiously waiting for you to put in your expert opinion being that you consider yourself the only expert in muscle "hypertrophy" on this board.
Maybe you can learn something from a non-expert like Tres Taco, whose physique far, far surpasses anything you have or could ever achieve. Note how he presented his protocol? He did it in a way that wasn't condescending or pretentious and actually inspired others, myself included, to give it a try.
I don't think there's a single person on this thread, or on this entire board for that matter, that gives a shit what you have to say about this or any other training method. This a very good, serious, and informative thread. Please don't ruin it like you do with every other thread you post on.