I have read this thread with peaked interest, as I too attended the NY Pro and left with a WTF feeling. I tried to brush it off as subjectivity and the nature of the beast, but when I saw the routine scores, well...I think I threw up in my mouth a little.
As far as viewing the routines in this "subjective" sport, I would like to bring up the point that there are (and correct me if I am wrong) 6 cumpulsory moves that are to be included in the 45 second routines, and should be in their 2 minutes. Well, objectively speaking, how do you reward any competitors who:
1. Cannot "high kick" higher than 90 degrees.
2. Tap down on their straddle and L or Pike holds
3. Cannot perform a toe touch
4. Cannot complete one or both splits
5. Can barely squeak out a 1 arm push-up
I think that it is plain to see that some of these basic functions were not executed by many of the high placing competitors. People rest on the defense that the sport is subjective, and I do believe that each persons image of the best physique can vary, along with judgements on performance style in a routine. I will say with conviction though that cumpulsory strength and flexibility moves are cut and dry. It is quite obvious that although these judges may be proficient in bodybuilding, they obviously are not experienced enough to judge a fitness competition.
I would like to add that none of what occured is the fault of any competitors, and everyone is out to do their best in what I think is a great sport. It is just a big fat shame that any win should be clouded with such doubt, and for that I blame both the judges and promoters.