Which candidate from the Dems are you hoping wins the primary?

[Thin Lizzy]

Don't hate the playa. Hate the game.

It sounds like you little snowflakes can't take the fact that he plays it better than any of you.

As if Trump could have beaten all the other Republicans in the primary and then Hillary in the general by using kid gloves.

They can dish it out but can’t take it.

[Board_SHERIF]

Would like to see Old Creepy Biden, as when he is crushed his effeminate Gay Muslim buddy would be hurt to.

"Run on your record of stagnant wages, of jobs leaving this country, of manufacturing jobs fleeing United States of America, of bad trade deals, of bad foreign policy. Creating and supporting ISIS etc...

He chaired the 1991 confirmation hearings for Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and was criticized for not doing enough to protect Anita Hill, who accused Thomas of sexual harassment. Biden has since apologized and said he should have done more to shield Hill from attacks by Republicans.

Fucking Sick the Gay Muslim invented a medal for Creepy:

[Humble Narcissist]

All the top democrats are dinosaurs.  The young ones they do have are marxists.

[Grape Ape]

All the top democrats are dinosaurs.  The young ones they do have are marxists.

Exactly their problem.

They need a younger, more centrist candidate.

[Thin Lizzy]

Exactly their problem.

They need a younger, more centrist candidate.

This is who they are now, Leftist/Marxists. They should run a hard left candidate and let the chips fall where they may. I believe it will end the same way it did in 2010 when the American people got a good look at the hard left. This group is even more insipid.

[Grape Ape]

This is who they are now, Leftist/Marxists. They should run a hard left candidate and let the chips fall where they may. I believe it will end the same way it did in 2010 when the American people got a good look at the hard left. This group is even more insipid.

Don't disagree.

They problem is, they've confused Trump hatred for an embracement of their crazy policies.

They're wrong, and are going to fuck it up unless they reign in the far leftists.

[Primemuscle]

Don't hate the playa. Hate the game.

It sounds like you little snowflakes can't take the fact that he plays it better than any of you.

So are you suggesting that lying and cheating are part of playing this game better? 

[myt1]

Would like to see Old Creepy Biden, as when he is crushed his effeminate Gay Muslim buddy would be hurt to.

"Run on your record of stagnant wages, of jobs leaving this country, of manufacturing jobs fleeing United States of America, of bad trade deals, of bad foreign policy. Creating and supporting ISIS etc...

He chaired the 1991 confirmation hearings for Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and was criticized for not doing enough to protect Anita Hill, who accused Thomas of sexual harassment. Biden has since apologized and said he should have done more to shield Hill from attacks by Republicans.

Fucking Sick the Gay Muslim invented a medal for Creepy:

Probably one of the very few times Biden told the truth since becoming a politician  ".....I don't deserve this..."

So are you suggesting that lying and cheating are part of playing this game better? 

Yes, that's what he's suggesting, but what difference does it make for you, really?  Your mind is made up on who you believe and what you think, and unless it's A007 or Straw you're going to lamely attempt to discredit or dismiss things by everyone else on here.

Whether it's spelled out in a post, given to you as a link/chart/graph/poll, or on video with audio for you to hear and watch, you just never get it, never will, ......nor do you have any desire what so ever to want to get it.

[SOMEPARTS]

So are you suggesting that lying and cheating are part of playing this game better? 

A case study: 70-something, voted for paragons of virtue like Bill Clinton and who can even imagine the others.... Willful ignorance.

[myt1]

A case study: 70-something, voted for paragons of virtue like Bill Clinton and who can even imagine the others.... Willful ignorance.

Seriously, a conscious decision has been made to never seek truth, or even consider something other than his current views and whatever/whoever tells them what his views should be.  Very frustrating to me that many like him will be voting.

[Desolate]

So are you suggesting that lying and cheating are part of playing this game better? 

Just because you want to call his approach "lying and cheating" that doesn't make it true.

[chaos]

So are you suggesting that lying and cheating are part of playing this game better? 

"I did not have sexual relations with that woman"

[myt1]

"I did not have sexual relations with that woman"

"But I sure plastered her dress...yeehaw!!!"

[Agnostic007]

"Michael Moore wondered if the Democrats might take a page from the Republicans’ book and nominate a celebrity. “Democrats would be better off if they ran Oprah [Winfrey] or Tom Hanks,” he told CNN’s State of the Union show yesterday. "

Sadly this is probably true. The Democrats only have two hopes to win in my opinion. Either run someone famous like the two mentioned, or the number of registered voters that don't like Trump actually vote this time. Not looking promising for either

[SOMEPARTS]

"Michael Moore wondered if the Democrats might take a page from the Republicans’ book and nominate a celebrity. “Democrats would be better off if they ran Oprah [Winfrey] or Tom Hanks,” he told CNN’s State of the Union show yesterday. "

Sadly this is probably true. The Democrats only have two hopes to win in my opinion. Either run someone famous like the two mentioned, or the number of registered voters that don't like Trump actually vote this time. Not looking promising for either

When your platform is absolute shit, yes a celebrity is required for sure. 

[Yamcha]

I hear what you are saying, I just disagree. Trump is a sewer rat. He stoops lower than any other politician before him, aiming at POW's, wives, nothing is out of bounds for him. He has brought politics to a new low. Its just not me saying it. Lots of very smart people are saying it.

Didn't Charles Sumner get beaten the shit out of him on the Senate floor by a Democrat and his gold-topped cane?

But you're right, ORANGE MAN BAD!!! SMALL HANDS!

[myt1]

"Michael Moore wondered if the Democrats might take a page from the Republicans’ book and nominate a celebrity. “Democrats would be better off if they ran Oprah [Winfrey] or Tom Hanks,” he told CNN’s State of the Union show yesterday. "

Sadly this is probably true. The Democrats only have two hopes to win in my opinion. Either run someone famous like the two mentioned, or the number of registered voters that don't like Trump actually vote this time. Not looking promising for either

In another thread Hanks and in YT vids, and stories I've read, Hanks is rumored to be former child lover, and now current "handler".  How much truth there is to those things.....I really don't know, but it would not shock me.  The little phone hack thing was only a warning to celebs of today and those into their 50's.  There is no celebrity out there that would survive the onslaught of salacious details that would come out.  They would make Trump look like a choir boy, and more straight-laced than the Pope (the latter might actually be true)

Also, keep in mind a big part of the reason Chappelle disappeared was because of Bill Cosby and Oprah Winfrey.  Everyone thought he was just crazy and making up conspiracy shit, and now look where Cosby is.  Oprah has plenty of skeletons in her closet she won't want known, nor will she want her financials out there.  Blacks love her shows, but when her extravagant lifestyle is exposed minorities will realize they have more in common with Trump in regards to some shady business deals, not being able to control his mouth, and liking some strange every now and then vs. a lady that's entrenched within Hollweird and gave away a few cars to her audience (likely provided by the company for free or very cheap)

[polychronopolous]

Mavericks owner Mark Cuban considering 3rd-party presidential run for 2020



Mark Cuban says that "if circumstances were right," he would make a bid for the White House in 2020. (Getty)
Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban told the New York Daily News Monday that he has not ruled out a 2020 presidential run and that if he follows through, he will do so without political affiliation.

If he does, he would become the second prominent billionaire to consider a third-party run for the White House in an election that is expected to be a referendum on the Donald Trump presidency.


Former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz has talked repeatedly about his intent to run as a third-party candidate, ignoring critics who have castigated his decision for having the potential to split Democratic-leaning votes while accomplishing little else.

A Cuban run would likely draw the same kind of blowback.

Cuban: ‘We’ll see what happens’
“I haven’t decided anything yet,” Cuban told the Daily News. “We’ll see what happens. It all comes down to how things play out. It’s not something I feel like I have to do. ... But it’s something that if circumstances were right I would do.”

Cuban criticized the Democratic party for what he sees as a group that’s more focused on appealing to its base than independents and Republicans.

“If you look at the Democrats right now, there’s like a democratic gravity that pulls all the candidates to the same point,” Cuban said. “And it’s very difficult to show leadership in a situation like that because you can’t truly lead if you have to find an equilibrium between being a true leader for the people of your country vs. getting elected in your primary.

“None of those things are conducive to out-and-out leading the country.”

Cuban’s potential political pitfalls
If Cuban does run, he’ll likely face increased scrutiny for the culture of sexual harassment and misconduct that existed within the Mavericks and prompted an apology and a $10 million donation to women’s causes, as well as a 2011 sexual assault accusation against Cuban himself from an alleged incident at a Portland, Oregon night club.

Police investigated Cuban for the 2011 incident in which a woman said Cuban “thrust his hand down the back of her jeans and penetrated her vagina with his finger” while they were posting for a photograph.

Cuban denied the allegation and was not charged due to insufficient evidence.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/sports.yahoo.com/amphtml/mavericks-owner-mark-cuban-considering-3-rdparty-presidential-run-for-2020-053532557.html

[SOMEPARTS]

Billionaires are not allowed to run as socialists.

Going to be interesting who the Dem candidate is...they are heading for a split in the party with a centrist Ross Perot type like Shultz or Cuban - if they keep up the extreme positions.

[Humble Narcissist]

Well, at least we know Cuban isn't gay.

[Primemuscle]

Well, at least we know Cuban isn't gay.

[illuminati]

I hear what you are saying, I just disagree. Trump is a sewer rat. He stoops lower than any other politician before him, aiming at POW's, wives, nothing is out of bounds for him. He has brought politics to a new low. Its just not me saying it. Lots of very smart people are saying it.

And lots of Very Smart People were saying Killary was a Certainty to Win. WRONG.

[loco]

 

[polychronopolous]

Billionaires are not allowed to run as socialists.

Going to be interesting who the Dem candidate is...they are heading for a split in the party with a centrist Ross Perot type like Shultz or Cuban - if they keep up the extreme positions.

I was kind of surprised to see that Cuban was still considering running.

The Mavericks have alot of potential to build on for next season. They struck gold by drafting Luka Doncic. Traded for that 7'3 New York kid. Plus they have tons of cash to spend on free agency and a good shot at landing a top 5 draft pick.

As much time as Cuban spends court side watching the Mavs play, you would think he would want nothing to do with Washington DC.

[Agnostic007]

And lots of Very Smart People were saying Killary was a Certainty to Win. WRONG.

Those smart people obviously gave too much credit to people, thinking character, morals and ethics mattered. They obviously don't