The idea of ironage is cool- a tribute site to bodybuilding's "golden era".
The execution of the idea is bad- a very unfriendly site towards freedom of opinion and freedom of expression.
The number of posts on this thread shows that the site has earned quite the negative reputation as a result of their 'rules'
I don't post there because, I enjoy talking about our current Mr. Olympia, whom MOST of them hate.
I don't think I would last very long over there, posting pre-gut Ronnie pics when I feel it is relevant to the discussion...
The biggest problem I have is that because they are a "tribute site" you are not allowed to speak the TRUTH when it comes to one of their heroes if it might be negative:
Example: we all know that Arnold in 1980 esp. (and to some extent 1975) had fairly skinny quads for his frame. That is totally obvious.
Would I be able to say this on Ironage?
Answer: probably.
BUT: would that comment win me any friends?
Hell no.
Why can't ironage be a "tribute site" while allow its members to say what they feel is correct?
Surely, they can have it both ways-
1. Recognize that bodybuilding has progressed in some ways and gotten worse in others.
2. Recognize that past champions are in some ways better than todays pros but are in some ways WORSE
3. Realize that Arnold and company did not fart rainbows or have skittles flying out their ears - in other words, they were not perfect..
If GetBig had an "ironage-like subforum" it would be amazing- we have freedom over here!