4-1 Reyes would have been bullshit as well. Doesn't matter split or unanimous so long as the scores were within reason.
4-1 Jones was in line with the horrible scorecards all night long.
I agree that 4-1 Reyes would have been bullshit, but had two judges given Jones 48-47, with the dissenting judge giving Reyes 49-46 [4-1], I wouldn't have had that feeling of politics and the whole "Knock out the champ" trope/lore.
I guess what I mean is that at least I would have had some faith that these fights could be judged in a way that deviates from that "Knock out the champ" lore.
I'm just saying that a lone judge giving Reyes 4-1 would have given me more faith in the judging/scoring system than Jones getting that lone 4-1 vote.
A straight 48-47 for either fighter, or a split decision 48-47 from two judges to one fighter, with another judge giving 48-47 to the other fighter would have also been fine with me, regardless of which fighter won.
I'm just saying that if I had to pick a 49-46 [4 rounds to 1] for one fighter, I would have given that to Reyes. I'm not saying I think that's fair - just more fair than a 49-46 for Jones.
TheWeasle does pretty good breakdowns on YouTube: