So, because Craig & Kelly didn’t cancel their “food delivery service” immediately after the killing, THAT should absolve them of the murder charges? Maybe they didn't stop it "a while back" because the murder was a spontaneous event.
Did I say that? The question is not if they cancelled it, but was there a phone call telling someone to pick it up, and what occurred. As the the phone triangluation, if they did show that Craig's phone was somewhere else when he got a phone call, does that cast doubt on Craig, but pinpoint on Kelly? Did they actually check this six tazer shots, where they were, fired on successive times. First degree murder? Or manslaughter?
Not saying one of the other, but interesting to discuss what may have occurred if there was a trial.
