I'll try my best to address and clarify the issues you've raised.
I know there appears to be an incongruity in claiming that White Christian males are at the bottom of the pecking order yet in the same breath also claim that they are not an oppressed class, and in many cases, a privileged class. But it is this very privilege that is the cause of this bias toward them.
I got the part about the two opposing ideas. What confused me is where you said that you were speaking from the context of "leftists" when you said white men were most discriminated against, even though it appeared to be your own perspective. And the quoted post doubles down on that.
Your perspective is interesting regarding the War Between the States. You see it as half the country fought to keep slavery, I see it as we fought AND WON the war against the Confederates which led to the freeing of slaves. It should be noted that slavery at that time existed all throughout world history. America is unique in that it fought AND WON the war to eliminate it and change the country and the rest of the world. Why do you focus on the opposition group that lost and has since been discredited?
Because it's relevant and historically accurate, particularly in response to someone whose trying to make an argument that it's a sign of how benevolent and progressive this country is in regards to race. Firstly, as the other poster pointed out the civil war and the civil rights act happened nearly a century apart. For the sake of brevity, I didn't focus on this in my last post, but there has never been any suggestion that the civil war was about equal rights for blacks. And every progressive move in regards to race that this country has seen has been impeded tooth and nail by a large opposition. And that IS significant in this discussion because the opposition not only wielded way more economic power and political influence than the group they were opposing, but they also wielded it over that group. You making that claim is like saying a guy who was wrongly convicted on fabricated evidence gets out after 50 years and multiple re-trials, gets a nominal settlement from the government and that's proof of well the justice system works. (Incidentally, what is your idea of discredited?)
I'm sure there are racist in the company that you work for but just the fact that you work there proves it is not a racist company.
Let's say there's a contest, reality show, whatever. You have a bunch of different contestants, most white, a few black, asian, hispanic, etc. Before the contest starts, the producers let the minorities know that they're not going to be a part of the group of finalists. Only the whites contestants would be eligible to be finalists. Your argument is just the fact that the minorities are allowed to participate is proof that the contest is not racist. I don't agree. If there is an imposed ceiling on how well the minorities would be able to do in the contest and race factors into that, I consider it a racist contest.
Having a Black President is proof positive that systemic institutionalize racism no longer exists.
No, it isn't. I see rightwingers post this all the time and it just shows a lack of understanding of what institutional racism means. Obama was elected in what was essentially a democratic election. Individuals voted for an individual. There have always been black individuals who excelled. Even during slavery, jim crow, etc there were black individuals who excelled. Institional racism refers to policies by institutions that affect populations: hiring policies that covertly limit minority workers, law enforcement policies that target minority citizens, gerrymandering that disenfranchises voters, etc.
There is a clear distinction between a person's race and their behavior and appearance.
No, there isn't. People use all three all the time to judge people in the same way. In this very thread you said you use "white" and "American" interchangeably based on what you consider distinct American behavior. The judgements you're applying to fat people here, people often use similar judgements based on race. You've posted assumptions about me based on solely on my race. Right in this thread, multiple people have posted that racism is good. It's laughable that you would post this. This is joswift level debate.
There was this one guy that was particularly offensive shouting out obscenities and threatening people where even a mother yell at him that she was with her 5-year-old daughter. and to show some consideration and decency. I debated doing something about it but just called the cops and reported it...
What does this have to do with anything? This is not a story about people just going about their business. It is a story about people actively harassing people in a way that could become physical.
The point is I don't go looking and taking note and keeping track at people's appearance and behavior but when it's in my face I notice. And to make the claim, like Prime did, that it's their problem and doesn't affect me and others is simply being disingenuous. I wonder what Prime would think if he had a new neighbor that just let his house and yard over the years got to pot. ...
This is a lot of words to get to "when I do it, it's fine and the level I do it at is the correct one." The neighbor's house comparison is a bad one because it could have real world implications on the property values in the neighborhood. No matter how many words you spill, someone else's weight does not inherently affect your person or property. Other than the times you're pressed up against someone heavy on the bus, but the photographic examples you provided showed guys who were not near you or anyone else, for that matter.
Let me ask you this: do you think most white people would notice if they were the only whites in an area? If a couple is driving through a neighborhood they are unfamiliar with, do you think they would notice the ratio of black people in the area ? Or if they walked into a business they were unfamiliar with, if most of the patrons and staff were black, do you think it would affect whether or not they patronized that business? We know for a fact that many do just based on the posts here. Or just reverse the classroom situation: if it was a white girl who wound up in a class where all of the other students and the teacher were black, do you think she would notice? Do you think it would be odd of her to do so? Do you think it would affect her perception of the class? Do you think it would affect how she participated in class, how she expressed herself?
So, ignoring the fact that we're basing this line of discussion on something a teenager told you 40 years ago, why is it so bizarre that he'd be mindful of how he navigated predominately white spaces? Especially at that age. Because it's different when white people do it...