The question wasn't which group is more threatening. The question was, generally will you condemn White Supremist and Militia groups; an example of the Proud Boys was given, granted a minor player in the right wing extremist movement. But why leave any ambiguity, especially when Trump is always charged with being a racist? Why didn't he just unambiguously and forcefully denounce all White Supremist, Neo-Nazis, and right wing extremist militia
groups?
Never seen someone bobble a softball question with such clueless incompetence. See if I can channel my inner Donald here.
"Will I condemn white supremacists? Of course. What kind of a question is that? Of course I do.
While we're at it, let's condemn racism of any kind. Telling people that their skin color is a problem, like they do in these anti-whiteness classes that people are being forced to attend. That's racist, same way anti-blackness training would be, right? That's why I put a stop to it in our military and federal institutions. Because I care about what you can do, not what you look like.
My opponent thinks your skin color defines everything about you. He doesn't think black people are able to look after themselves. He wants to give them government money. Everyone likes money but he's insulting them. None for whites. None for hispanics. None for anyone else. He wants to give black people loans while denying the same loan to someone who happens to be white. He has different rules for different skin colors. Don't believe me? It's all in writing on his website. Isn't that the definition of racist policy?
Me? I've got the same rules for everyone. That's how you can tell I'm not a racist. Joe Biden has different rules for different skin colors. Kamala Harris was right about him. Joe Biden is a racist and his racist policies are divisive and un-American."
One side or the other needs to hire me.
