Author Topic: 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 KYLE RITTENHOUSE NOT GUILTY 🇺🇸🇺🇸  (Read 83287 times)

The Scott

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22552
  • I'm a victim of soicumcision!!
Re: KYLE RITTENHOUSE is out of Jail 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
« Reply #225 on: November 11, 2021, 05:22:34 PM »
Like it or not, the U.S. and Oregon are democracies. "The form of government in which political control is exercised by all the people, either directly or through their elected representatives." And where the majority rules. 

FYI, it was not the legislature but Oregon voters who overwhelmingly passed Measure 110 making possession of small amounts of cocaine, heroin, LSD and methamphetamine, among other drugs, punishable by a civil citation — akin to a parking ticket — and a $100 fine. That fee can get waived if you get a health screening from a recovery hotline.

In Oregon as in California, anyone can propose an initiative and with enough signatures put it on the ballot.

Our governor is a  defender of pedophiles.  When he and Oregon's governor decide that pedophilia is just another gender variation and decide to make it legal what will you say then?  And no, I am not joking. 

I have found that people will defend that which is disgusting so that their own deviance(s) may one day be made "acceptable by law".  And no, I do not  think you are a pedophile.  And yes, I do think pedophiles are actively working to legitimize their perversion and California's governor is an advocate for their filthy ways and Oregon's may well be too.  And they are not alone as cockroaches just love one another's company.  Until the lights are turned on.

All Oregonians that use meth and heroin can die from their addiction for all I care.  Why?  Because I do not care about filthy addicts.  A curse on them and their hedonistic governing body.   

I  hope they start dropping like bodybuilders.  Now.




Vince G, CSN MFT

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25841
  • GETBIG3.COM!
Re: KYLE RITTENHOUSE is out of Jail 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
« Reply #226 on: November 11, 2021, 05:22:44 PM »
HE did not buy the gun.

🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄   try using another argument.  If i hand  9 year old kid a gun, its legal because he didnt buy it??  The law applies to carrying it around..concealed or open carry


So again, he had no business getting a gun because he was 17 and he was underage...PERIOD!!!!
A

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42303
Re: KYLE RITTENHOUSE is out of Jail 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
« Reply #227 on: November 11, 2021, 05:23:51 PM »

What if it were a 12g, .380, 9mm, 45, 357, 38spl, etc?  Doesn't matter the weapon. He had the right to defend himself.  Watch the videos for Christ's sake   Why are you (and the rest of MSM) focused on "AR-15"?


Maybe because that is what Kyle was armed with. Are any of the other guns you mentioned not considered deadly weapons?

Under Wisconsin statutes say that anyone under 18 who "goes armed" with any deadly weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor, Kyle Rittenhouse, 17, was not old enough to legally carry the assault-style rifle he had.



Can you find something in the Wisconsin State laws that allows Kyle to carry a AR-15 or any other gun or deadly weapon under the circumstances which he was?

Wisconsin gun laws:

948.60  Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.
948.60(1)(1)  In this section, “dangerous weapon" means any firearm, loaded or unloaded; any electric weapon, as defined in s. 941.295 (1c) (a); metallic knuckles or knuckles of any substance which could be put to the same use with the same or similar effect as metallic knuckles; a nunchaku or any similar weapon consisting of 2 sticks of wood, plastic or metal connected at one end by a length of rope, chain, wire or leather; a cestus or similar material weighted with metal or other substance and worn on the hand; a shuriken or any similar pointed star-like object intended to injure a person when thrown; or a manrikigusari or similar length of chain having weighted ends.
(2) 
(a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.
(b) Except as provided in par. (c), any person who intentionally sells, loans or gives a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age is guilty of a Class I felony.
(c) Whoever violates par. (b) is guilty of a Class H felony if the person under 18 years of age under par. (b) discharges the firearm and the discharge causes death to himself, herself or another.
(d) A person under 17 years of age who has violated this subsection is subject to the provisions of ch. 938 unless jurisdiction is waived under s. 938.18 or the person is subject to the jurisdiction of a court of criminal jurisdiction under s. 938.183.
(3) 
(a) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon when the dangerous weapon is being used in target practice under the supervision of an adult or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the supervision of an adult. This section does not apply to an adult who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age for use only in target practice under the adult's supervision or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the adult's supervision.
(b) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon in the line of duty. This section does not apply to an adult who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age in the line of duty.
(c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593. This section applies only to an adult who transfers a firearm to a person under 18 years of age if the person under 18 years of age is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593 or to an adult who is in violation of s. 941.28.
History: 1987 a. 332; 1991 a. 18, 139; 1993 a. 98; 1995 a. 27, 77; 1997 a. 248; 2001 a. 109; 2005 a. 163; 2011 a. 35.
Sub. (2) (b) does not set a standard for civil liability, and a violation of sub. (2) (b) does not constitute negligence per se. Logarto v. Gustafson, 998 F. Supp. 998 (1998).

Never1AShow

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • World Record Holder in French Toast Diving
Re: KYLE RITTENHOUSE is out of Jail 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
« Reply #228 on: November 11, 2021, 05:26:17 PM »
Yes, not a deep one and its a slight nark on my lower back.  I was shanked by an inmate while doing a cell check in a block that had gotten a little too gullt  Got me pretty good.  I just walked out , locked down the pod and got patched up by the nurse quick because i wanted to get back to help clean house and get a little payback and then went home to UC for antibiotics to avoid infection.  The scar from thst is gone , it was a quick slice

UC? You went back home to the University of California?  Which campus, Riverside, Irvine, LA?

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42303
Re: KYLE RITTENHOUSE is out of Jail 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
« Reply #229 on: November 11, 2021, 05:27:18 PM »
🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄   try using another argument.  If i hand  9 year old kid a gun, its legal because he didnt buy it??  The law applies to carrying it around..concealed or open carry



So again, he had no business getting a gun because he was 17 and he was underage...PERIOD!!!!

Princess is "fishing" for something, anything that supports her opinion. Unfortunately, a lay person's opinion is not worth a hoot when it comes to the law.

Maybe Kyle's attorneys could claim Kyle was using the gun for target practice. Nope, that won't work either unless he was being supervised by an adult.

The Scott

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22552
  • I'm a victim of soicumcision!!
Re: KYLE RITTENHOUSE is out of Jail 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
« Reply #230 on: November 11, 2021, 05:29:34 PM »
UC? You went back home to the University of California?  Which campus, Riverside, Irvine, LA?

University of Cuckoldry.

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61538
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: KYLE RITTENHOUSE is out of Jail 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
« Reply #231 on: November 11, 2021, 05:32:50 PM »
Maybe because that is what Kyle was armed with. Are any of the other guns you mentioned not considered deadly weapons?

Under Wisconsin statutes say that anyone under 18 who "goes armed" with any deadly weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor, Kyle Rittenhouse, 17, was not old enough to legally carry the assault-style rifle he had.



Can you find something in the Wisconsin State laws that allows Kyle to carry a AR-15 or any other gun or deadly weapon under the circumstances which he was?

Wisconsin gun laws:

948.60  Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.
948.60(1)(1)  In this section, “dangerous weapon" means any firearm, loaded or unloaded; any electric weapon, as defined in s. 941.295 (1c) (a); metallic knuckles or knuckles of any substance which could be put to the same use with the same or similar effect as metallic knuckles; a nunchaku or any similar weapon consisting of 2 sticks of wood, plastic or metal connected at one end by a length of rope, chain, wire or leather; a cestus or similar material weighted with metal or other substance and worn on the hand; a shuriken or any similar pointed star-like object intended to injure a person when thrown; or a manrikigusari or similar length of chain having weighted ends.
(2) 
(a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.
(b) Except as provided in par. (c), any person who intentionally sells, loans or gives a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age is guilty of a Class I felony.
(c) Whoever violates par. (b) is guilty of a Class H felony if the person under 18 years of age under par. (b) discharges the firearm and the discharge causes death to himself, herself or another.
(d) A person under 17 years of age who has violated this subsection is subject to the provisions of ch. 938 unless jurisdiction is waived under s. 938.18 or the person is subject to the jurisdiction of a court of criminal jurisdiction under s. 938.183.
(3) 
(a) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon when the dangerous weapon is being used in target practice under the supervision of an adult or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the supervision of an adult. This section does not apply to an adult who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age for use only in target practice under the adult's supervision or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the adult's supervision.
(b) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon in the line of duty. This section does not apply to an adult who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age in the line of duty.
(c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593. This section applies only to an adult who transfers a firearm to a person under 18 years of age if the person under 18 years of age is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593 or to an adult who is in violation of s. 941.28.
History: 1987 a. 332; 1991 a. 18, 139; 1993 a. 98; 1995 a. 27, 77; 1997 a. 248; 2001 a. 109; 2005 a. 163; 2011 a. 35.
Sub. (2) (b) does not set a standard for civil liability, and a violation of sub. (2) (b) does not constitute negligence per se. Logarto v. Gustafson, 998 F. Supp. 998 (1998).

Don’t make an ass of yourself. This was already clarified in court unless you personally want to act as the prosecution and go in and argue it.

Princess L

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13106
  • I stop for turtles
Re: KYLE RITTENHOUSE is out of Jail 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
« Reply #232 on: November 11, 2021, 05:37:17 PM »
Do you know that Kyle was not legally old enough to carry the AR15?

"Under Wisconsin statutes that say anyone under 18 who "goes armed" with any deadly weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor, Kyle Rittenhouse, 17, was not old enough to legally carry the assault-style rifle he had."

Yes, which is a misdemeanor. Regardless, he had every right to defend himself.
:

Princess L

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13106
  • I stop for turtles
Re: KYLE RITTENHOUSE is out of Jail 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
« Reply #233 on: November 11, 2021, 05:44:27 PM »
Maybe because that is what Kyle was armed with. Are any of the other guns you mentioned not considered deadly weapons?

Under Wisconsin statutes say that anyone under 18 who "goes armed" with any deadly weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor, Kyle Rittenhouse, 17, was not old enough to legally carry the assault-style rifle he had.



Can you find something in the Wisconsin State laws that allows Kyle to carry a AR-15 or any other gun or deadly weapon under the circumstances which he was?

Wisconsin gun laws:

948.60  Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.
948.60(1)(1)  In this section, “dangerous weapon" means any firearm, loaded or unloaded; any electric weapon, as defined in s. 941.295 (1c) (a); metallic knuckles or knuckles of any substance which could be put to the same use with the same or similar effect as metallic knuckles; a nunchaku or any similar weapon consisting of 2 sticks of wood, plastic or metal connected at one end by a length of rope, chain, wire or leather; a cestus or similar material weighted with metal or other substance and worn on the hand; a shuriken or any similar pointed star-like object intended to injure a person when thrown; or a manrikigusari or similar length of chain having weighted ends.
(2) 
(a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.
(b) Except as provided in par. (c), any person who intentionally sells, loans or gives a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age is guilty of a Class I felony.
(c) Whoever violates par. (b) is guilty of a Class H felony if the person under 18 years of age under par. (b) discharges the firearm and the discharge causes death to himself, herself or another.
(d) A person under 17 years of age who has violated this subsection is subject to the provisions of ch. 938 unless jurisdiction is waived under s. 938.18 or the person is subject to the jurisdiction of a court of criminal jurisdiction under s. 938.183.
(3) 
(a) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon when the dangerous weapon is being used in target practice under the supervision of an adult or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the supervision of an adult. This section does not apply to an adult who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age for use only in target practice under the adult's supervision or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the adult's supervision.
(b) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon in the line of duty. This section does not apply to an adult who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age in the line of duty.
(c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593. This section applies only to an adult who transfers a firearm to a person under 18 years of age if the person under 18 years of age is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593 or to an adult who is in violation of s. 941.28.
History: 1987 a. 332; 1991 a. 18, 139; 1993 a. 98; 1995 a. 27, 77; 1997 a. 248; 2001 a. 109; 2005 a. 163; 2011 a. 35.
Sub. (2) (b) does not set a standard for civil liability, and a violation of sub. (2) (b) does not constitute negligence per se. Logarto v. Gustafson, 998 F. Supp. 998 (1998).

Again, a misdemeanor.
:

Dave D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17043
Re: KYLE RITTENHOUSE is out of Jail 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
« Reply #234 on: November 11, 2021, 05:46:31 PM »
🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄   try using another argument.  If i hand  9 year old kid a gun, its legal because he didnt buy it??  The law applies to carrying it around..concealed or open carry


So again, he had no business getting a gun because he was 17 and he was underage...PERIOD!!!!

Are you saying you want 9 year olds in prison for misdemeanor charges?

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61538
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: KYLE RITTENHOUSE is out of Jail 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
« Reply #235 on: November 11, 2021, 05:48:19 PM »
Yes, which is a misdemeanor. Regardless, he had every right to defend himself.

He was legal and established in court

D.O.A.

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2475
  • Revenge is a dish best served ice cold
Re: KYLE RITTENHOUSE is out of Jail 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
« Reply #236 on: November 11, 2021, 05:49:08 PM »
Yes, which is a misdemeanor. Regardless, he had every right to defend himself.
He sure did have the right!

The Scott

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22552
  • I'm a victim of soicumcision!!
Re: KYLE RITTENHOUSE is out of Jail 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
« Reply #237 on: November 11, 2021, 05:49:54 PM »
Again, a misdemeanor.

The mere sound of any word that has "mean" within it will set off these cucks and they will whine like a worn bearing on their auto-buttfucking machines.  I loathe these creatures and pray daily to any deity listening for their cRapture.

FTN m'lady. 

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61538
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: KYLE RITTENHOUSE is out of Jail 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
« Reply #238 on: November 11, 2021, 05:53:33 PM »
Maybe because that is what Kyle was armed with. Are any of the other guns you mentioned not considered deadly weapons?

Under Wisconsin statutes say that anyone under 18 who "goes armed" with any deadly weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor, Kyle Rittenhouse, 17, was not old enough to legally carry the assault-style rifle he had.



Can you find something in the Wisconsin State laws that allows Kyle to carry a AR-15 or any other gun or deadly weapon under the circumstances which he was?

Wisconsin gun laws:

948.60  Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.
948.60(1)(1)  In this section, “dangerous weapon" means any firearm, loaded or unloaded; any electric weapon, as defined in s. 941.295 (1c) (a); metallic knuckles or knuckles of any substance which could be put to the same use with the same or similar effect as metallic knuckles; a nunchaku or any similar weapon consisting of 2 sticks of wood, plastic or metal connected at one end by a length of rope, chain, wire or leather; a cestus or similar material weighted with metal or other substance and worn on the hand; a shuriken or any similar pointed star-like object intended to injure a person when thrown; or a manrikigusari or similar length of chain having weighted ends.
(2) 
(a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.
(b) Except as provided in par. (c), any person who intentionally sells, loans or gives a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age is guilty of a Class I felony.
(c) Whoever violates par. (b) is guilty of a Class H felony if the person under 18 years of age under par. (b) discharges the firearm and the discharge causes death to himself, herself or another.
(d) A person under 17 years of age who has violated this subsection is subject to the provisions of ch. 938 unless jurisdiction is waived under s. 938.18 or the person is subject to the jurisdiction of a court of criminal jurisdiction under s. 938.183.
(3) 
(a) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon when the dangerous weapon is being used in target practice under the supervision of an adult or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the supervision of an adult. This section does not apply to an adult who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age for use only in target practice under the adult's supervision or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the adult's supervision.
(b) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon in the line of duty. This section does not apply to an adult who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age in the line of duty.
(c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593. This section applies only to an adult who transfers a firearm to a person under 18 years of age if the person under 18 years of age is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593 or to an adult who is in violation of s. 941.28.
History: 1987 a. 332; 1991 a. 18, 139; 1993 a. 98; 1995 a. 27, 77; 1997 a. 248; 2001 a. 109; 2005 a. 163; 2011 a. 35.
Sub. (2) (b) does not set a standard for civil liability, and a violation of sub. (2) (b) does not constitute negligence per se. Logarto v. Gustafson, 998 F. Supp. 998 (1998).

https://vm.tiktok.com/TTPd2dLmK8/

Royalty

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 32980
  • Nasser Endorses Trump 🇺🇸
I've seen black guys call other black guys coons for defending kyle.

 ???

The hate for a boy who got caught up in a crazy life or death situation is so weird.

And Kyle shot white people only. This was white on white combat.

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42303
Re: KYLE RITTENHOUSE is out of Jail 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
« Reply #240 on: November 11, 2021, 06:06:52 PM »
He was legal and established in court

Was it established after this ruling on November 9th? I cannot find anything that says it was. Perhaps you can provide a link.

"Kyle Rittenhouse's defense team has tried again to get a charge for possession of a dangerous weapon by a minor dropped. Again, Kenosha County Circuit Judge Bruce Schroeder denied the motion, and the charge remains."

https://www.kenoshanews.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/kyle-rittenhouse-defense-again-tries-fails-to-get-gun-possession-charge-dropped/article_ffc2241b-2b71-5a1a-a863-838837ee1a8b.html

I found this which was reported 2 hours ago.

"In addition to the homicide charges, Rittenhouse faces two counts of first-degree recklessly endangering safety, along with a misdemeanor charge for illegally possessing a gun. Prosecutors said they do not intend to modify those charges.

https://www.npr.org/2021/11/11/1054949120/prosecutors-lesser-charges-against-kyle-rittenhouse

Apparently, he won't be charged in Illinois with illegal possession of a gun.....so that's one good thing. He's got plenty of other charges against him to worry about. 


Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61538
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: KYLE RITTENHOUSE is out of Jail 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
« Reply #241 on: November 11, 2021, 06:09:52 PM »
Was it established after this ruling on November 9th? I cannot find anything that says it was. Perhaps you can provide a link.

"Kyle Rittenhouse's defense team has tried again to get a charge for possession of a dangerous weapon by a minor dropped. Again, Kenosha County Circuit Judge Bruce Schroeder denied the motion, and the charge remains."

https://www.kenoshanews.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/kyle-rittenhouse-defense-again-tries-fails-to-get-gun-possession-charge-dropped/article_ffc2241b-2b71-5a1a-a863-838837ee1a8b.html

You purposely either ignored my link or didn’t want get proved wrong again. And you do realize that more than likely the lesser charges will be thrown out because of the murder charges….right? Or should they just keep the hypothetical charge and slap him with a $200 fine?

Princess L

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13106
  • I stop for turtles
Re: KYLE RITTENHOUSE is out of Jail 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
« Reply #242 on: November 11, 2021, 06:10:45 PM »
Was it established after this ruling on November 9th? I cannot find anything that says it was. Perhaps you can provide a link.

"Kyle Rittenhouse's defense team has tried again to get a charge for possession of a dangerous weapon by a minor dropped. Again, Kenosha County Circuit Judge Bruce Schroeder denied the motion, and the charge remains."

https://www.kenoshanews.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/kyle-rittenhouse-defense-again-tries-fails-to-get-gun-possession-charge-dropped/article_ffc2241b-2b71-5a1a-a863-838837ee1a8b.html

Pretty sure this is correct and current.
:

BB

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17722
  • I hope I'm not boring you.
I've seen black guys call other black guys coons for defending kyle.

 ???

The hate for a boy who got caught up in a crazy life or death situation is so weird.

That being said, any craziness that pops off after this will be White Antifa. Black folks are fighting a bit online now about it, but they don't really care because it's White people business.

The ones that are going wild over it are, as you'd expect unpassable trannies, reddit twerps, and assorted other neer-do-wells. They are absolutely seething at Kyle, the judge, the hard of hearing photographer, etc..... It's hilarious.


Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42303
Re: KYLE RITTENHOUSE is out of Jail 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
« Reply #245 on: November 11, 2021, 06:31:26 PM »
You purposely either ignored my link or didn’t want get proved wrong again. And you do realize that more than likely the lesser charges will be thrown out because of the murder charges….right? Or should they just keep the hypothetical charge and slap him with a $200 fine?

Sorry. You do realize your TikTok link is from November 2nd and all it shows is his defense lawyer arguing that the law doesn't apply. Apparently, the judge disagreed.

The illegal carry charge is small potatoes and may or may not be thrown out. And you are right, a small fine and an extra 9 months in prison is not a big deal as compared to what he otherwise faces. Whether or not it has an impact on the jury's decisions remains to be seen.

Let me get this straight. I am not trying to prosecute Kyle for killing those two people. Truth be told, I feel sorry for him because regardless of what happens in court, he has very like ruined his life. He's still basically a kid with a lot of life ahead of him. This is unbelievably sad. He didn't get to the place he was at mentally by himself. Everyone who influenced his choices has some blame. But, he is the person who is going to pay for those actions, not them.

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61538
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: KYLE RITTENHOUSE is out of Jail 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
« Reply #246 on: November 11, 2021, 06:34:32 PM »
Sorry. You do realize your TikTok link is from November 2nd and all it shows is his defense lawyer arguing that the law doesn't apply. Apparently, the judge disagreed.

The illegal carry charge is small potatoes and may or may not be thrown out. And you are right, a small fine and an extra 9 months in prison is not a big deal as compared to what he otherwise faces. Whether or not it has an impact on the jury's decisions remains to be seen.

Let me get this straight. I am not trying to prosecute Kyle for killing those two people. Truth be told, I feel sorry for him because regardless of what happens in court, he has very like ruined his life. He's still basically a kid with a lot of life ahead of him. This is unbelievably sad. He didn't get to the place he was at mentally by himself. Everyone who influenced his choices has some blame. But, he is the person who is going to pay for those actions, not them.

Really? The judge disagreed? I watched it. I’ve been watching the entire trial since day one because of the possible ramifications on our second amendment..so far we’re winning. Sorry dude, the law is clear is on this.

Moontrane

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6290
  • Drill, Baby, Drill!
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/prosecutor-rittenhouse-murder-trial-tangles-again-with-judge-2021-11-11/

Prosecutors want jury to consider lesser charges in U.S. teen Rittenhouse's murder trial

KENOSHA, Wis., Nov 11 (Reuters) - Prosecutors in the murder trial of Kyle Rittenhouse said they would seek approval for the jury to consider lesser charges after days of testimony in which considerable evidence was presented in the U.S. teenager's argument that he acted in self-defense.
---
Kenosha County Assistant District Attorney James Kraus said he planned to ask the judge to allow the jury to consider lesser charges - so-called lesser included offenses - on the counts involving the shootings of Huber and Grosskreutz, a move that would lower the burden of proof for conviction.
---
"I'm not surprised the state requested lesser included instructions," Hart said. "They recongize that their case had some shortcomings and they are trying to salvage as many convictions as they can."


chaos

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59442
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
Re: KYLE RITTENHOUSE is out of Jail 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
« Reply #248 on: November 11, 2021, 08:47:23 PM »
UC? You went back home to the University of California?  Which campus, Riverside, Irvine, LA?
Urgent care...
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61538
  • It’s All Bullshit
The only way Rittenhouse will be found guilty is if they allow the jury to mail in their verdict…