🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 KYLE RITTENHOUSE NOT GUILTY 🇺🇸🇺🇸

[Royalty]

No, he's not.  The 40 year old has an extensive rap sheet dating back 2 decades, including multiple felony convictions, car theft, ID theft, drugs, escaping custody, battery, obstruction, domestic violence and disorderly conduct.  He contacted the prosecutors and offered to testify in exchange for immunity from existing charges.  The prosecution declined.

So basically Rittenhouse was up against a bunch of life long criminals who never learned a damn thing. Mr “Jump-kick” was a criminal before Kyle was even born.

[Dave D]

No, he's not.  The 40 year old has an extensive rap sheet dating back 2 decades, including multiple felony convictions, car theft, ID theft, drugs, escaping custody, battery, obstruction, domestic violence and disorderly conduct.  He contacted the prosecutors and offered to testify in exchange for immunity from existing charges.  The prosecution declined.

I hope prime doesn’t read this. He will tell you that a persons past actions have little to do with the events of that night.

[Primemuscle]

I hope you nor your family never have an encounter with a man like Rosenberg.

I know you’re having a hard time following along but I didn’t say it was okay that Rittenhouse killed him because of his criminal record.

Am I having a hard time following along? Seems you know something I am not aware of.

You didn't say this in so many words, but many others have. Also, I realize you were simply making an observation while implying your opinion.

I thought this was interesting; 'In self-defense cases, the mental health history of an alleged aggressor isn’t considered relevant unless the person who used deadly force was aware of it. Rittenhouse wasn’t.'

https://apnews.com/article/kyle-rittenhouse-racial-injustice-wisconsin-kenosha-homicide-21bc78b702c2998ba227216aeebed2c5

[Princess L]

I hope prime doesn’t read this. He will tell you that a persons past actions have little to do with the events of that night.

Jump kick man should have been in jail that night.  Instead, due to left leaning judges not wanting to incarcerate, he was out on probation.

[Primemuscle]

I hope prime doesn’t read this. He will tell you that a persons past actions have little to do with the events of that night.

Now who is having difficulty following along? I didn't say anything of the kind. I questioned what can an cannot be used as evidence in a criminal trial.

 

[Dave D]

Am I having a hard time following along? Seems you know something I am not aware of.

You didn't say this in so many words, but many others have. Also, I realize you were simply making an observation while implying your opinion.

I thought this was interesting; 'In self-defense cases, the mental health history of an alleged aggressor isn’t considered relevant unless the person who used deadly force was aware of it. Rittenhouse wasn’t.'

https://apnews.com/article/kyle-rittenhouse-racial-injustice-wisconsin-kenosha-homicide-21bc78b702c2998ba227216aeebed2c5

Now who is having difficulty following along? I didn't say anything of the kind. I questioned what can an cannot be used as evidence in a criminal trial.

 

Okay Prime.

[Straw Man]

Ok good point, so you can also see how a skateboard being swung is a weapon. Based on your earlier post you said it wasn’t.

And by this same token every time the police shot an “unarmed” man it is not true, unless they had no arms.

I think this is a George Zimmerman type of situation, people had guns in hand and they used them when attacked. While I think Zimmerman is a scumbag who should have served some prison time (and not because Trayvon was an innocent victim) I think Rittenhouse was a kid with no life experience and he didn’t realize how stupid it was to be a the riots with an AR15.

Kyle obviously looked nervous or Rosenberg would have never tried to pull the gun from his hands. Rosenberg was a predator and he knew that Kyle wasn’t going to put up to much of a fight….. he gambled and it cost him his life.

Poor decisions ruined many lives that day.

so you in our mind no one "unarmed" unless they literally don't have arms?

do if one person has a gun and another person has a gun or even a skateboard would you define them both as being "armed"

Do you want to speculate on why so many of our posters insisted that the traitors on January 6th were unarmed?

[Royalty]

so you in our mind no one "unarmed" unless they literally don't have arms?

do if one person has a gun and another person has a gun or even a skateboard would you define them both as being "armed"

Do you want to speculate on why so many of our posters insisted that the traitors on January 6th were unarmed?

Dude, you just got yourself banned

[Vince G, CSN MFT]

This thread is about the Rittenhouse case, not your TDS.  Any further mention of Trump, January 6th, or anything unrelated will result in a ban from this thread and possibly this board.

Oh come on Princess L, no need to threaten a ban over that...

[Coach is Back!]

I fucking knew it. Fucking liberal pussies

[Straw Man]

This thread is about the Rittenhouse case, not your TDS.  Any further mention of Trump, January 6th, or anything unrelated will result in a ban from this thread and possibly this board.

Why

Where is that rule

Also, it's germane to the conversation because people on this thread are calling a skateboard and fists "weapons" and many of those same people insist that the people who stormed the Capitol had no weapons/were unarmed even though they had metal pipes, hockey sticks, mace, etc..

You can't have it both ways

[Straw Man]

I fucking knew it. Fucking liberal pussies

Is that the same Twitter account that told you Newsom was hospitalized due to complication from the booster shot

[Royalty]

I fucking knew it. Fucking liberal pussies

Sounds like they are ready to acquit.


However, those 2 jurors must have anticipated in advance that there would be riots. Or did they just realize it today??

[Coach is Back!]

Is that the same Twitter account that told you Newsom was hospitalized due to complication from the booster shot

I can’t help it because you liberal pussies can’t do it any other way. Make that another thread of yours that backfired talking about the one on the poli board

[BB]

I fucking knew it. Fucking liberal pussies

I was reasonably sure it was going to be a hung jury. Lots of sleeper far left roaming around hoping to get on juries llike this and muck up the works.

Also a fair amount of retards that think a skateboard isn't deadly force, or he was ok shooting one, but not the others, etc....

[Coach is Back!]

I was reasonably sure it was going to be a hung jury. Lots of sleeper far left roaming around hoping to get on juries llike this and muck up the works.

Also a fair amount of retards that think a skateboard isn't deadly force, or he was ok shooting one, but not the others, etc....

They knew he would be acquitted.

[Megalodon]

No, he's not.  The 40 year old has an extensive rap sheet dating back 2 decades, including multiple felony convictions, car theft, ID theft, drugs, escaping custody, battery, obstruction, domestic violence and disorderly conduct.  He contacted the prosecutors and offered to testify in exchange for immunity from existing charges.  The prosecution declined.

Thanks for the explanation. He has a similar background to the thugs-for-hire in Portland and apparently everywhere else. Criminals hired to burn down cities.

[Dave D]

so you in our mind no one "unarmed" unless they literally don't have arms?

do if one person has a gun and another person has a gun or even a skateboard would you define them both as being "armed"

Do you want to speculate on why so many of our posters insisted that the traitors on January 6th were unarmed?

You said this:

Of course a fist can be a weapon

Do you think it's strange that so many of our resident Trump supporters spent 12 pages trying to argue that the TRAITORS on January 6th were "unarmed" when they had numerous weapons including their fists are now trying to argue that a skateboard and a fist are weapons?

How does that work?

The first post on this thread claims that they had no weapons

I guess when Bum said they had no weapons that  he meant that none of them had a skateboard

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=672908.0

So what do you want to say that the insurgents were weaponized or they weren't?

Were they attacking people and trying to take their guns?

The insurgents were evil but the rioters of Kenosha (and Minneapolis, Seattle, etc...) were good citizens exercising their rights?

The insurgents burned down public and private buildings and looted just like the rioters did?

You really believe the insurgents are traitors to the country but the rioters werent?

And no I don't think a skateboard is the same type of weapon as a gun but if i'm going after a gunman with a skateboard it's because i'm trying to harm him.

Who in your mind were the real heroes that night in Kenosha ?

[Irongrip400]

No point in arguing anymore. Isn’t the jury debating now? It’s like the election night and everybody is arguing how it’s going to end up. What will be will be soon enough. Hopefully there’s no riots either way. Anybody rioting over this verdict is just looking to stir up trouble.

[Vince G, CSN MFT]

Jury going home for the night...not being sequestered so they are going to have to navigate the crowd

[SOMEPARTS]

Yeah, I'm sure this thing is way outdated but it works fine which is all I care about

Sam Walton drove around in an old dented truck and Warren Buffet lives in the house that he bought back in 1958

I had a friend who drove around in a 90k Audi and had a bunch of watches that were worth 5k or more and I used to lend him money to pay his rent because he was always broke

Interesting take...conservatism. 

Your party thinks we are shutting down all coal plaints and no gas cars in 10 years though, so you're gonna have to get with the times and reduce that carbon footprint.

[djliftsthings]

wtf

[Vince G, CSN MFT]

wtf

He didnt shoot any blacks...lol

[Coach is Back!]

He didnt shoot any blacks...lol

Yet he’s a white supremisist? Lol

[Straw Man]

You said this:
So what do you want to say that the insurgents were weaponized or they weren't?

Were they attacking people and trying to take their guns?

The insurgents were evil but the rioters of Kenosha (and Minneapolis, Seattle, etc...) were good citizens exercising their rights?

The insurgents burned down public and private buildings and looted just like the rioters did?

You really believe the insurgents are traitors to the country but the rioters werent?

And no I don't think a skateboard is the same type of weapon as a gun but if i'm going after a gunman with a skateboard it's because i'm trying to harm him.

Who in your mind were the real heroes that night in Kenosha ?

I have no knowledge that any of three people who were shot were involved in looting, or property damage, etc..
Do you have proof of that? ...and of course even if they were that doesn't give Rittenhouse the authority to shoot them and I don't recall his lawyers trying to make that argument in court.

You can beat a person to death with your bare hands but that doesn't make them "armed" nor does it diminish the fact that you killed someone.     

All I've done is point out the total hypocrisy on this board regarding what is considered a "weapon" or being "armed" which is well documented on this board.  If a flag pole or hockey stick or a skateboard is being used as a weapon it's all the same.   To be fair a skateboard is not a great choice of weapon which is probably why no one bothered to bring one to the Capitol.

All that matters in this case is whether jury thinks the defendant was justified in using deadly force

I don't think he was but that's my opinion and it doesn't matter

All that matters is what the jury decides

I'm fine with whatever they decide since they are the "jury" and they spent the time hearing all the evidence and all the arguments

Will everyone else here accept the results...regardless of the outcome?