There’s 1.5 billion people, don’t think it’s a problem
Russia is right next to them for options
Next is to come to getbiggers like shizzo or Goodrum for advice and expertise
Actually, Bevo - it is!
Do you recall the one-child policy that China had implemented for decades? I believe from 1980 [if not sooner] until sometime in the early- to mid-2010's [maybe 2014 or just about]. Anyway, it resulted in some MAJOR gender demographic shifts - due to female babies being aborted, more male babies were born. This put the Chinese male/female gender split at something like 53 and 47 [whereas here in North America, our population is probably 49.5/50.5 split male/female, with females slightly outnumbering men].
But look at China's gender demographic breakdown like this:
If the 47% female population hooks up with 47% male, that leaves 6% of the entire population, all male, without a mate.
It's not THAT bad, depending on your definition of bad, or how you look at it - but it means that even assuming perfect and complete hookup/mating in society, that of the 53% of China's society that is male, 6 of 53 [or - just over 10% of the entire male Chinese population] literally MUST become INCEL's, whether they want to or not.
Here in North America, we have an INCEL issue already [caused by female hypergamy, and women only selecting the best mates - generally 78% of women only vie for the top 20% of men...can you believe that?], and that's with a 50.5% female population. Which means that in North America, it's actually women who are left out in the dust even assuming perfect mating of 49.5% men to 49.5% women with 1% of women [just over 2% of all women] left without male mates.
So in China, you have female hypergamy [this is a universal female trait, no matter how much feminists will deny it - ALL women/females universally go for the best men/males possible. Some fight this in order to get a mate/man that they can control, but it never ends well], AND a major [by demographic/evolutionary standards] a huge percentage of men who would HAVE to be single, even if female hypergamy was NOT a thing, and even assuming 100% equal mating.
China's one-child policy was unintentionally eugenic, by forcing over 10% of its male population to be without female dates [in addition to the eugenic selection pressure females ALREADY place upon males due to hypergamy].
Normally that wouldn't matter, but China has a - what - close to 1.5B total population, as you said? If we use that figure, you have 750 MILLION men, at least 10% of whom CANNOT find a woman/mate because of the out-of-whack gender demographics of China. So you have a population of 75,000,000 angry Chinese men who can't get dates.
Now imagine that population invading another country?
Of course - my calculation is a bit off. I think China's population is lower than 1.5B, but even if we assumed 1.2B [which it was already above in the year 2000], that would be just under 65 million single men [using the 53% male population percentage figure], and still be a massive military force of horny/angry men, not to be reckoned with.
The exact figure, using the exact numbers, would still produce in the tens of millions of extra soldiers [males seeking status] in addition to the already populous Chinese military.
A read in the past year or so that simulation games show that the USA could not win a war against the Chinese IN CHINA, but would win a global war against Chinese [that makes sense], but this Chinese INCEL issue is definitely won which will exceed/trump North America's INCEL issue.
There could be some interesting - or even sad or scary - times ahead. If even people like me are having trouble pushing back with the slow creep of authoritarianism [having currently been trespassed for standing up for my right not to wear a mask], then I see very little hope of society going anywhere but where the current global elite want it to go.
"Just wear a mask" becomes "Just get the vaccine" VERY easily, and nothing thus far indicates to me that people will push back against this.
So I'm not exactly optimistic at this point.
