I stopped at the first sentence and will address the rest in another post if needed. We will always disagree on this.
There is everything inherently wrong with porn. It is inherently wrong. I don't want to go on 12 pages about it. I knew this when I was using it and always knew it morally. I just gave into my flesh and didn't care. But yeah, it's wrong and there's nothing right about it.
Getting off on others having sex is wrong. Morally wrong. You or others have a very weak argument to prove otherwise. But it's legal for now...Go nuts.
If you really HONESTLY believe this, then why do your posts seem to overlook the fact that Andrew Tate runs a porn empire? You say there's good in him. If I was aware of someone making a ton of money off of something that I was so strongly morally opposed to, I would not be able to overlook it so easily. If I was so morally opposed to it, I would not be able to dismiss their arrest in relation to it so easily.
How morally wrong do you consider porn? I'm assuming it can't be that high up on the list. For me, murder and child sexual abuse are at the top. Property theft is a little further down. If someone makes a lot of money doing any of these things, I think they are scum.
If they get arrested in relation to these things, I am happy for the rest. They don't get to be called Top G anymore.
Serious question- how low is porn on your moral scale? Like, what do you compare it to.It has to be pretty low. Like do you feel like pedophiles have good in them and have ideas worth listening to? Or is there a point where you feel like someone is so immoral, their other ideas aren't worth listening to?