I'll just say, the court processes have supported my positions for the last 4 years.
So, you are in favor of wiping out a statute of limitations on misdemeanors, cobbling it together to create a felony, using judges with monetary and political conflicts of interest, not telling the lawyers the actual charges until closing arguments, and picking a jurisdiction that leans entirely one way politically?
In addition, you are in favor of prosecuting someone for a routine business practice, where there was no victim, that had support of the banks, and they have pretty much said in plain sight that they will not prosecute others in the industry for?
And also the fact that both prosecutors ran on a campaign of "getting" this person?
This is what you support:
Lavrentiy Beria, the most ruthless and longest-serving secret police chief in Joseph Stalin’s reign of terror in Russia and Eastern Europe, bragged that he could prove criminal conduct on anyone, even the innocent. “Show me the man and I’ll show you the crime” was Beria’s infamous boast.
Anyway, the James case already got ransacked in the appellate court, so bad the attorneys were covering their asses worried about being sanctioned. And both of these will get overturned.
