PIP
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-4988992/amp/Too-exercise-kill-white-man.html
You see? This! This is what I'm talking about. The 'study' flies in the face of everything we know about exercise.
I'd be truly curious to knowa few things about this study.
I guess 1st- what was the percentage of the ethnicities involved? If out of 3,715 participants only 20 or 30 were black then that would be a statistical anomaly.
Next I'd ask whete were the participants recruited from? For example were these people who were on a workout program because of a family hx of coronary disease or at risk of obesity or were these college students.
Then how were these numbers tracked over 25 years? Who in the fuck can say with certainty that they've worked out 7.5 hours a week for 25 years? I mean thats an hour a day every single day for 25 years.
Now I also understand that that's an AVERAGE so some participants may have worked out 15 hours a week for 25 years while others may have worked out less than one hour a week but the average, over the course of 25 years, is 7.5. So is it the people in the study that actually worked out less that developed CAC?
Or a participant, for example worked out 15 hrs a week for the first 7 years of the study, then 5-7 hrs for the next 10 years of the study. Then not at all for the last 8 years of the study, which is when he developed CAC?
So many other factors: what kind of exercise, quality control, truthful reporting, diet, regional factors.
"There are lies, damn lies and statistics"- Mark Twain.