Matt, my wife weighs 114 lbs, so it is realistic.. And yes, she's vertically challenged at 5' 2"...
I was about to say...lol.
I had a girlfriend in 2015 who was 95-lb, but...at 4'11".
I'm still sort of with my ex now, and she is 130-lb which is THIN. Almost to the point where I'd be concerned if she dropped 10-lb. But she is 5'7".
So yes, for 5'2" and under, that would be believable. It would be anything much taller [maybe over 5'3.5"] that I would question being 114-lb or lighter.
However:
Impressive. Very nice.
It's not some insignificant thing for a woman to weigh 114-lb, if she is over 40. I would even say: that doesn't happen by accident at that age.
But I think the main thing I notice about the lies of Walter/Jane is that they are ALL super high level lies.
Notice that joswift could probably claim to be 250-lb based on some of his pictures? But I don't recall him ever doing that. But he looks massive enough that you could believe that. It may just come down to muscle shape in his case. But he did NOT claim a lying weight [that I know of].
Some of the Walter/Jane lies are insulting to read.
I suppose Walter's 315-lb front squat lie was not THAT elite. I've done that before. I'm sure you've gone way over that.
But ALMOST all claims Walter/Jane make are extremely high level. Clearly some border on the preposterous. But it is the COMBINATION of all of them I find to be most absurd.
So Jane is an elite sprinter [Top 200 among White women in history], at the national level or beyond in cycling - good at BOTH sprinting and endurance, which people tend NOT to be - at the state or national level in strength athletics for her weight class, and is at that level of strength presumably at age 40-50, as she "doesn't remember" when she basically obtained nearly the world record female 40-yard dash time, but "thinks she was 18". Memory lapses of that sort, let alone for an achievement that extraordinary, tend to date back TWO decades or more. If she was under 30, she wouldn't forget if she was 18.
A 309x3 deadlift for a 134-lb woman aged 40-50 is quite amazing, isn't it?
On top or that, she's been in Chicago, Phoenix, and London, all in recent time.
These claims REEK of someone who has achieved NOTHING in their real lives. Walter made a massive list of my claims and called them bullshit:
[1] My lifts [
The videos speak for themselves].
[2] My Army record [this is a matter of PUBLIC RECORD].
[3] Being autistic [
I'm just on the cusp, but WHY would I lie about that?
Why would ANYONE].
[4] My 12s or 12.5s 100m sprint time in 1996 [should be on record at the Lakehead District School Board, and is just a normal Top 10% fastest time for a 14-year-old boy].
[5] He claimed I wore a mask during the fake pandemic, meanwhile, I have all my correspondences with the police.
My university degrees can be verified online. A lot of local press covered my contests + hundreds of spectators + videos.
My suspicion is he has nothing noteworthy to claim. Take your squat for example - that's the type of "big" [Top 0.1%] achievement that I don't think he has any of.
He's literally DOUBTING claims I made with video proof where I'm maybe Top 10%. Maybe Top 5%. Good achievements, but NOTHING anyone should doubt.
He doubts my hardly impressive claims I have video proof for, then posts ridiculous lies with NO proof from his account, and JustPlaneJane's account lies both strongly indicate to me that these are people who don't even train, and so have no idea what even constitutes a realistic lie + just feeling the need to lie that much/big suggests they have no good achievements of their own.
JustPlaneJane even needs to claim to have been to multiple big cities.
IMO, when you have a Top 0.1% lift for years [your squat], you take it for granted. It almost becomes BORING. For someone to desire making such BIG lying claims, I think stems from never having had that feeling personally
The best he can hope for is being recognized anonymously on a message board. That's how I interpret this. Example: I told him my 385x2 squat claim @170 is NOTHING to even bat an eyelid over. Yet he didn't believe me. NEWSFLASH: EVERYONE CAN SEE SOME OF WHAT I'VE DONE IS DECIDELY AVERAGE. I wasn't boasting - I was stating it like I would state my first name. Yet he didn't believe my 385x2 squat claim. In combination with him posting such bullshit, I assume he is extremely weak, and not a high achiever.
Do you have an interpretation, Gym Rat?
40 yrs ago in 1983 when we started dating, she weighed 114 lbs... So she never gained a lb in 40 years and 2 kids...
That is probably very rare though...
That's INCREDIBLE. Wow...
But see...that's the thing: THAT IS RARE.
People lie so much on here, that I think MANY of us [even unintentionally] are confused as to how rare such things are!
A 225-lb bench press would out you in the Top 0.15% to Top 0.6% of strongest people in North America. Yet on Getbig, I often hear people saying that they see people, say, squatting 405 at their gym "all the time".
That's bullshit.
My gym has 250 members. Only one member squats more than I do [405+]. I suspect another also can...but he doesn't squat.
At the Canada Games Complex over here, I only witnessed one person squat over 405 since 2008. That is my city's biggest facility. I saw four people deadlift 495+ other than me. That's over 15 years.
As B. Hank said: no one is joining us on this bench challenge. They will claim it is beneath them. Maybe. But I doubt many bench over 315.
In fact, I think one factor is:
People BELIEVE legendary liars like the former SquadFatter [RIP], and don't post videos THINKING people are so strong. PEOPLE ARE NOT. If you bench 250-lb, you are nearing the Top 0.1% of strength in North America.
People believe the bullshit, and think they themselves are weak. The data proves otherwise. But lies like those of SquadFatter make people doubt themselves, or even also jump the bandwagon bashing someone for being weak, who is in the Top 0.1% of strength in reality.
Your squat = Top 0.1% in North America!!!
Are you aware of that? Because Getbig would make it seem like your squat is "average" and "happens all the time". That's simply not true.
