I know quite a few people who had trouble shortly after administration, and imo there's a whole lot more with subclinical issues out there.
It was a great litmus test. Really showed who's who in most cases, since most people only got it after restrictions and mandates. When did you take yours? Did you 'have no choice' lol?
You can larp as a staunch conservative if it helps you cope until the next time you go along with some regime bullshit or buckle under pressure.
We can argue about it if you want. Youll get all kinds of support. Most guys here will be on your side because they're like you. They also talk up a conservative storm, liberty etc, display flags and such, and they can't be counted on at all when it matters. They just want a pandemic amnesty, lets all move on, agree about trannies and critical race nonsense and Soros Gates etc, so we can pretend like we're all in the same camp, and they really don't like being reminded that deep down they're chickenshit.
Yeah, I bet you regret it. It must really suck.
Well you are making assumptions about me.
1. No. I got it before mandates. My own decision, my own accord. Based on what I thought was right at the time. I regret taking it because the evidence would show that it doesn't work, not because I've suffered ill effects. You are just as bad as the "conservatives" you condemn. LOL.j
2. I'm of a 'law and order' not a 'reform type.' generally speaking I'm mostly apolitical, maybe libertarian. Except when it comes to law and order. Then I have pretty strong convictions (oh, that's historical, ever since we've had a basket case for a president, with perverted creeps butt fucking each other on the senate floor, stealing women's clothes, leaving cocaine around the white house, I tend to identify more as a conservative even though I still really only care about law & order)
So you've made an assumption about me and the conservatives of getbig. I will make an assumption about you: it's easy to believe in conspiracies. It must comfort you or affirm you in someway to think there's a bunch of cops and prosecutors locking up black guys regardless if they're guilty. And it's a bullshit myth. In most cases: whether youu want to focus on the Vax, or this case, or politics in general the most realistic answer is correct. And conspiracy theories aren't realistic. I've laid out half a dozen reasons why this guy finally won his appeal.
Hell, GB has quite a few people who are openly racist. None of them would derive any pleasure from knowingly arresting and convicting the wrong person, black or white. People aren't that simple and base. They prosecuted this guy because the evidence pointed to him as the suspect. If he had so.e air tight alibi he should've presented it in court.
3. My point from the beginning is: prevailing in court does not always equate to innocence. Because I'm not going to take a bite out of the low hanging fruit. You want want to believe that all these black guys are in danger of being arrest and thrown into prison for no reason, go ahead. That's your decision.
4. You can stigmatize whatever you want. The vaccine, political affiliation, getbig conservatives, whatever. My point is if this guy was wrongfully convicted, it's not as a result of something as base as simple racism. And if he won his appeal it's nnot necessarily because he's innocent, he may be, I'm informing you and the other hammer & sickle, counter culture, dope smoking, hippies, (and you'll get plenty of support from them too) the real world reasons why court room hearings unfold the way they do.
Being a contrarian doesn't make you an intellectual. You're not fighting the 'system.' The counter culture IS the culture. The system IS broken, just not in the way you assume. And assumption, not presumption, is what you're doing here.
