Poll

what's your opinion ?

trump didn't have sex with the pornstar, he just gave her seed money.
2 (2.2%)
trump did have sex with the porn star and paid her off. but I don't care
38 (40.9%)
trump is an honest man. and I believe him.
12 (12.9%)
trump is the devil incarnate.
9 (9.7%)
trump is a traitor, pedophile and liar and should be locked up.
16 (17.2%)
there will be a civil war.
16 (17.2%)

Total Members Voted: 68

Author Topic: Donald Von Shitzhizpantz the legend continues.  (Read 234113 times)

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42373
Re: Donald Von Shitzhizpantz the legend continues.
« Reply #1625 on: July 17, 2025, 05:08:33 PM »
Liberal media greatly outweighs conservative.

And, while Fox is conservatively biased, they don't hide it.  It's known.

CNN/MSNBC/ABC/CBS all claimed they were neutral, but they are completely leftist.   The former Twitter, Facebook, Youtube, etc all disproportionally suppressed conservative views.  This has all been proven statistically.

This isn't a "both sides do it equally" type thing.

Specifically, how, where, when and by whom did CNN, MSNBC, ABC, and CBS claim to be neutral? All of these networks are shown as left of center on various bias charts, just as FOX is shown right of center. This suggests that all of them and not just FOX have a 'known' bias.

https://www.allsides.com/media-bias/media-bias-chart
https://www.allsides.com/blog/announcing-allsides-media-bias-chart-version-102-new-ratings-realclearpolitics-cnbc-and-more?utm_source=homepage&utm_medium=Banner-main&utm_campaign=general_071625_biaschart10.2&utm_content=blogpost_launchblog

All people are biased regardless of whether they think they are or not. That is human nature. Journalists are biased. Media caters to its audiences’ biases.

"Can something that is created by biased humans still be useful and trustworthy?

YES, otherwise nothing would be useful or trustworthy. Things created by biased humans are just useful and trustworthy to different degrees."

Grape Ape

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24804
  • SC è un asino
Re: Donald Von Shitzhizpantz the legend continues.
« Reply #1626 on: July 17, 2025, 07:24:22 PM »
Specifically, how, where, when and by whom did CNN, MSNBC, ABC, and CBS claim to be neutral? All of these networks are shown as left of center on various bias charts, just as FOX is shown right of center. This suggests that all of them and not just FOX have a 'known' bias.

https://www.allsides.com/media-bias/media-bias-chart
https://www.allsides.com/blog/announcing-allsides-media-bias-chart-version-102-new-ratings-realclearpolitics-cnbc-and-more?utm_source=homepage&utm_medium=Banner-main&utm_campaign=general_071625_biaschart10.2&utm_content=blogpost_launchblog

All people are biased regardless of whether they think they are or not. That is human nature. Journalists are biased. Media caters to its audiences’ biases.

"Can something that is created by biased humans still be useful and trustworthy?

YES, otherwise nothing would be useful or trustworthy. Things created by biased humans are just useful and trustworthy to different degrees."

The chart is measuring major networks vs fledgling websites, and giving them equal weight.  Each one counts as "one".  Nothing about audience size, reach, popularity, etc......the Washington Times offsets the one of the AP, the CBS News, CNN, The New Yorker or the NYT?

Think back to 2016 when this shit started getting exposed.  Regular people were not looking at the NYT, ABC, NBC, etc as propagandist arms of the left.  Now, of course, they've been exposed, and smart people know the deal.

Yes, more conservative sites have emerged, but they had nowhere near the audience, or the trust that the major networks used to have. 
Y

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42373
Re: Donald Von Shitzhizpantz the legend continues.
« Reply #1627 on: Today at 03:29:01 PM »
The chart is measuring major networks vs fledgling websites, and giving them equal weight.  Each one counts as "one".  Nothing about audience size, reach, popularity, etc......the Washington Times offsets the one of the AP, the CBS News, CNN, The New Yorker or the NYT?

Think back to 2016 when this shit started getting exposed.  Regular people were not looking at the NYT, ABC, NBC, etc as propagandist arms of the left.  Now, of course, they've been exposed, and smart people know the deal.

Yes, more conservative sites have emerged, but they had nowhere near the audience, or the trust that the major networks used to have.

If these charts only measured major liberal leaning/centrist networks against conservative leaning networks, aside from FOX, there would be nothing on the conservative side of the charts. Do you think this would be more accurate and fairer than including the fledgling websites is? Why do the conservative sites have relatively tiny audiences as compared to the more liberal ones? Why are there not more conservative major networks if this is what folks prefer?