Author Topic: Hankins Discussion - Lies?  (Read 231643 times)

joswift

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40048
Re: Hankins Discussion - Lies?
« Reply #2300 on: November 01, 2026, 07:34:32 AM »
I saw an SF guy talking about how he raised his kids. He said he saw his kid hanging off a tree branch on his property, thinking he will sure break something if he falls. Thinking it over he thought it's better he falls off here than if he climbs something higher and dies; he will learn a lesson so he didn't intervene.

I don't know exactly how this applies to Hankins, except that kids constantly jump off things, run and squat and put their skeletons through a lot. Kids are resilient and squatting isn't inherently dangerous. They twist their bodies in many "unnatural" non-ergonomic positions.

Though what I saw in his kid's squat video was that the kid didn't have his feet even. That might be something to adjust for Hankins before the kid descends into a squat.

This girl has excellent technique but the lift still puts stress on her joints. I have nothing against this, I don't think it's child abuse.



There is bend in the back and so on:



I'm trying to find a video series of a woman training her little girl in powerlifting since a few years old.

apart from weight training can you think of any other activity where someone puts a weight behind thei neck and bends their knees to 45 degrees?

And are there any two legged animals in the wild who add weight and squat down?

Its a totally unnatural activity

IroNat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 44433
  • Sometimes an asshole is the best man for the job
Re: Hankins Discussion - Lies?
« Reply #2301 on: November 01, 2026, 07:36:04 AM »
Her knees collapse inward on the ascent.^

joswift

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40048
Re: Hankins Discussion - Lies?
« Reply #2302 on: November 01, 2026, 07:40:27 AM »
Her knees collapse inward on the ascent.^

that kid needs taking into the care system for her own safety

Ps.. Poor Spencer will be watching his dad load the bar up to 250lbs if he sees a girl doing it.

chaos

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 65382
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
Re: Hankins Discussion - Lies?
« Reply #2303 on: November 01, 2026, 08:00:38 AM »

Its a totally unnatural activity
As is all weightlifting and training.
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!

WrongAdvices

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2188
  • 2024 NPC Charlotte Cup Champion
Re: Hankins Discussion - Lies?
« Reply #2304 on: November 01, 2026, 09:11:54 AM »
apart from weight training can you think of any other activity where someone puts a weight behind thei neck and bends their knees to 45 degrees?

And are there any two legged animals in the wild who add weight and squat down?

Its a totally unnatural activity

He’s apparently pathologically cursed with having to always say, yeah but still … actually … etc.

To the point of defending Hankins and clear abuse.  Cmon dude put those skills to positive use.

IroNat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 44433
  • Sometimes an asshole is the best man for the job
Re: Hankins Discussion - Lies?
« Reply #2305 on: November 01, 2026, 09:38:54 AM »
As is all weightlifting and training.

What about carrying a baby cow around as it grows bigger?

Gym Rat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14649
  • Hail, Hail, Hail & Kill!
Re: Hankins Discussion - Lies?
« Reply #2306 on: November 01, 2026, 09:49:22 AM »
Hankins creates fake scenarios like:  "worlds strongest 7 yr old autist w/ a mole on his eyelid" and then goes bananas for a month or two, and moves on to another.

The freak has severe mental illness, his poor kid doesn't stand a chance unless SteenTEETS keeps him away from the retard...

What in the holy hell????????????????  ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???

Humble Narcissist

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 38148
Re: Hankins Discussion - Lies?
« Reply #2307 on: November 02, 2026, 06:30:22 AM »
What about carrying a baby cow around as it grows bigger?
Worked for Milo.

tatoo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3792
Re: Hankins Discussion - Lies?
« Reply #2308 on: November 02, 2026, 08:51:13 AM »
Hankins creates fake scenarios like:  "worlds strongest 7 yr old autist w/ a mole on his eyelid" and then goes bananas for a month or two, and moves on to another.

The freak has severe mental illness, his poor kid doesn't stand a chance unless SteenTEETS keeps him away from the retard...

What in the holy hell????????????????  ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???

Hankins is a quitter.. bails on EVERYTHING… he probably got kicked out of the army for running away! Total pussy. They will have to pay people to to carry his casket in a couple years haha.

joswift

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40048
Re: Hankins Discussion - Lies?
« Reply #2309 on: November 02, 2026, 09:03:59 AM »
Hankins is a quitter.. bails on EVERYTHING…he probably got kicked out of the army for running away! Total pussy. They will have to pay people to to carry his casket in a couple years haha.

it was drugs, but he probably took them with the intention of getting caught and removed.

He engineered his exit

Lartinos

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4138
  • We Pray for Brian W.H. Hankins
Re: Hankins Discussion - Lies?
« Reply #2310 on: November 02, 2026, 10:25:47 AM »
it was drugs, but he probably took them with the intention of getting caught and removed.

He engineered his exit

The Army’s official records identify JKK as the separation code for enlisted soldiers discharged for misconduct (drug abuse) under Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 14. Boards of Review +1

What that means for Bhank

If the document is authentic and belongs to him:

* The military officially recorded drug abuse as the reason for his separation.
* This is not merely a message-board rumor or speculation.
* It doesn’t automatically establish that he was addicted to drugs, what substance was involved, or the circumstances of the incident.
* It does establish that his military separation was officially classified as drug-related misconduct.

The interesting part about “his copy”

If he claimed his personal copy didn’t show JKK, that could be legitimate—different documents or versions can contain different information.

But if he was specifically denying the recorded separation reason after someone produced his actual DD-214, that would be a considerably more suspicious explanation, especially given his reputation for lying.

The exact wording on his DD-214 would settle the distinction. The National Archives explains that the DD-214 includes separation information, including the official reason and separation code.”
1

joswift

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40048
Re: Hankins Discussion - Lies?
« Reply #2311 on: November 02, 2026, 10:47:46 AM »


RE 3 means he cant re-enlist

Feature of 14-12c Chapter   Description & Legal Standard
Qualifying Offenses   Includes major violations such as drug abuse, domestic violence, assault, driving while intoxicated (DWI), sexual offenses, theft, fraud, and unlawful absence (AWOL or desertion).[

what a day that was....

chaos

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 65382
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
Re: Hankins Discussion - Lies?
« Reply #2312 on: November 02, 2026, 11:15:39 AM »


RE 3 means he cant re-enlist

Feature of 14-12c Chapter   Description & Legal Standard
Qualifying Offenses   Includes major violations such as drug abuse, domestic violence, assault, driving while intoxicated (DWI), sexual offenses, theft, fraud, and unlawful absence (AWOL or desertion).[

what a day that was....
You think bhank tried to convince them they were "bio-identical" and therefore perfectly legal.
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!

joswift

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40048
Re: Hankins Discussion - Lies?
« Reply #2313 on: November 02, 2026, 11:28:14 AM »
You think bhank tried to convince them they were "bio-identical" and therefore perfectly legal.

it grows naturally so yes, perfectly legal

webstar

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10381
Re: Hankins Discussion - Lies?
« Reply #2314 on: November 02, 2026, 03:42:19 PM »


RE 3 means he cant re-enlist

Feature of 14-12c Chapter   Description & Legal Standard
Qualifying Offenses   Includes major violations such as drug abuse, domestic violence, assault, driving while intoxicated (DWI), sexual offenses, theft, fraud, and unlawful absence (AWOL or desertion).[

what a day that was.
...

I think the video of him driving around Home Depot like a lunatic  is a close second

Never1AShow

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9636
  • World Record Holder in French Toast Diving
Re: Hankins Discussion - Lies?
« Reply #2315 on: November 02, 2026, 08:46:46 PM »
I think the video of him driving around Home Depot like a lunatic  is a close second


There were many great days:

The day the Hi-Def Pictures came out
The night of the ditch drunks
Barfing Black Bile
Strict Curl "World Record" revoked
Cartoon dogs


Raymondo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8189
  • i AM AS SWORD CLASSGRAPPLER
Re: Hankins Discussion - Lies?
« Reply #2316 on: November 03, 2026, 12:18:18 AM »

There were many great days:

The day the Hi-Def Pictures came out
The night of the ditch drunks
Barfing Black Bile
Strict Curl "World Record" revoked
Cartoon dogs


That was one of the best days on Getbig ever, worthy of the old days, Squadfather outing, SMM meltdown, Milos arrested

Getbig went into a collective meltdown that Hanky actually won a show. I contemplated eating my hat and congratulating the poor bugger

And then the pictures came out and it was true comedy, I have a big smile on my face just thinking about it  :D

BigRo

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9640
  • Erin go Bragh
Re: Hankins Discussion - Lies?
« Reply #2317 on: November 03, 2026, 12:31:25 AM »


Hankins is bulking and training hard.

Gym Rat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14649
  • Hail, Hail, Hail & Kill!
Re: Hankins Discussion - Lies?
« Reply #2318 on: November 03, 2026, 01:06:22 AM »
What a weak/shaky f**k. Horrible.

Many gals are way stronger than this fragile, drug-filled / bald clown...

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DcWzix5hcfN/?psln=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==&srtk=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==

wes

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 75332
  • What Dire Mishap Has Befallen Thee
Re: Hankins Discussion - Lies?
« Reply #2319 on: November 03, 2026, 03:59:26 AM »


Hankins is bulking and training hard.
I never saw a person shake as much !!     :o

Never1AShow

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9636
  • World Record Holder in French Toast Diving
Re: Hankins Discussion - Lies?
« Reply #2320 on: November 03, 2026, 04:51:00 AM »


Hankins is bulking and training hard.

9 reps low incline with 80s isn't exactly a world record much less from someone juicing as much as him.

Gut evident at the end, looks 60

chaos

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 65382
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
Re: Hankins Discussion - Lies?
« Reply #2321 on: November 03, 2026, 06:31:10 AM »


Hankins is bulking and training hard.
What kind of 60lb mid-incline press, shaky arm, throwing dumbbells on the floor cause you're not strong enough to sit up with them, giant belly, skinny armed old man BS is this?
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!

Hulkotron

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 30537
  • naturally occurring compounds
Re: Hankins Discussion - Lies?
« Reply #2322 on: November 03, 2026, 07:04:15 AM »
Very strange/unconventional bench angle.

BB

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18691
  • I hope I'm not boring you.
Re: Hankins Discussion - Lies?
« Reply #2323 on: November 03, 2026, 07:21:55 AM »
Bhank is gonna need lots of rest and pro-offfee (or whatever he calls them) after that set. More CNS activation than a Bulgarian weightlifter.

joswift

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40048
Re: Hankins Discussion - Lies?
« Reply #2324 on: November 03, 2026, 07:28:23 AM »


Hankins is bulking and training hard.

its the old "step aside let me have a go" technique

This guy simply does not work out on a regular basis, he has no idea how to even lift a fucking weight properly