Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3492309 times)

pumpster · « **Reply #15525 on:** December 03, 2006, 12:03:02 PM »

FYI ND the proven loser & stalker with no life, refused to take my money 2 weeks ago, because he's unable to bench 400 lb. on a bowflex-in part because he weighs 160 lb. hahahahahahahahahahaha

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #15526 on:** December 03, 2006, 12:04:58 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on December 03, 2006, 11:54:25 AM

ND having to make it personal again, because he's psychologically disturbed. Seriously, get a life.

Peter McGough, who ND worships. Dec. 06 FLEX, p. 114:

"Coleman, with the best back in BB history".

Ronnie 2006 this sure looks like the best back in bodybuilding history lol

Necrosis · « **Reply #15527 on:** December 03, 2006, 12:08:04 PM »

dorians arms are not even in the top 30 among bodybuilding greats period. no comparison, yates had no detail, and they were smallish with bad insertions, it is clear in the photos.

pumpster · « **Reply #15528 on:** December 03, 2006, 12:09:22 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on December 03, 2006, 12:04:58 PM

Ronnie 2006 this sure looks like the best back in bodybuilding history lol

There goes ND's credibility considering how often he's been all over McGough's balls page after page telling us how much Pete knows...haahahahahahhaha

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #15529 on:** December 03, 2006, 12:11:42 PM »

Quote from: usmokepole on December 03, 2006, 12:08:04 PM

dorians arms are not even in the top 30 among bodybuilding greats period. no comparison, yates had no detail, and they were smallish with bad insertions, it is clear in the photos.

Smallish?

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #15530 on:** December 03, 2006, 12:15:09 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on December 03, 2006, 12:09:22 PM

There goes ND's credibility considering how often he's been all over McGough's balls page after page telling us how much Pete knows...haahahahahahhaha

No you didn't even use the quote correctly , it said that the best back in bodybuilding wasn't up to par !

and two Mr Olympias can't be wrong

and both have great backs as well do they would know.

Ronnie Coleman DESCRIBE DORIAN YATES: A close friend. Dorian is very intelligent, a great Mr. Olympia. He had the best side-chest pose and the thickest freakiest back I have ever seen.

Samir Bannout who had one of the best backs mind you on Cutler 2001

Jay Cutler blows the other bodybuilders away with the crisp detail of his muscularity from top to bottom. He has superior calves, hamstrings and glutes. His back is detailed and big, but it does not match up well against Ronnie, who has the second-best back in the history of bodybuilding behind the great Dorian Yates

Ronnie has the second best back behind the great Dorian Yates

You have nothing to work with.

dearth · « **Reply #15531 on:** December 03, 2006, 12:21:24 PM »

Yates = undefeated mr olympia
Coleman = defeated mr olympia

pobrecito · « **Reply #15532 on:** December 03, 2006, 01:06:56 PM »

Biceps mean hardly anything in a bodybuilding contest.

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #15533 on:** December 03, 2006, 01:22:23 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on December 03, 2006, 01:06:56 PM

Biceps mean hardly anything in a bodybuilding contest.

the same can be said about calves. Look at this year's top 6 line up. How many of them had great calves?

Now compare that number to how many had great arms.

pobrecito · « **Reply #15534 on:** December 03, 2006, 01:27:49 PM »

This is true.

Calves lost their importance in 1998.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #15535 on:** December 03, 2006, 01:49:57 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on December 03, 2006, 01:22:23 PM

the same can be said about calves. Look at this year's top 6 line up. How many of them had great calves?

Now compare that number to how many had great arms.

This is another dumb ass statement weak/torn biceps can be hidden , weak calves can't , they can be seen in every pose from every angle , weak calves are more of a liability than biceps .

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #15536 on:** December 03, 2006, 02:07:17 PM »

Yates at his best

pobrecito · « **Reply #15537 on:** December 03, 2006, 02:07:57 PM »

grainy as all hell!

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #15538 on:** December 03, 2006, 02:08:36 PM »

For all the idiots who say they can't see his biceps

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #15539 on:** December 03, 2006, 02:10:08 PM »

Who needs the biggest biceps? Yates didn't and here he is owning Ronnie in 1996

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #15540 on:** December 03, 2006, 02:16:00 PM »

Dorian just absolutely blowing everyone away in the rear latspread

Hulkster · « **Reply #15541 on:** December 03, 2006, 02:21:36 PM »

Hulkster · « **Reply #15542 on:** December 03, 2006, 02:22:55 PM »

Hulkster · « **Reply #15543 on:** December 03, 2006, 02:23:43 PM »

every time ND posts new scans of yates, it becomes even more clear than it already was that Ronnie at his best overall 1999 shape was better.

pumpster · « **Reply #15544 on:** December 03, 2006, 02:28:35 PM »

Yates' back looks great, yet it's obvious that Coleman's got better back muscle quality & detail & clearly a super taper. Also, the better arms make the shot more complete.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #15545 on:** December 03, 2006, 02:29:53 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on December 03, 2006, 02:22:55 PM

Great comparison until you get to the glutes and notice Ronnie's are way to big and and until you get to the calves .

Hulkster · « **Reply #15546 on:** December 03, 2006, 02:30:51 PM »

Quote

weak calves are more of a liability than biceps .

this statement has never ever been true in the eyes of bodybuilding in general or the judges.

ever.

did charles atas flex his calf in the 1940's?

hell no.

He flexed his biceps:

had he extended a calf, he would have got his ass kicked and sand kicked in HIS face.

bodybuidling would be even more gay than it already is.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #15547 on:** December 03, 2006, 02:31:21 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on December 03, 2006, 02:23:43 PM

every time ND posts new scans of yates, it becomes even more clear than it already was that Ronnie at his best overall 1999 shape was better.

I think Ronnie looks better in 99 in some poses and in some he doesn't compared to 98 , here is 99 and he looks fantastic until you get to those glutes lol

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #15548 on:** December 03, 2006, 02:32:19 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on December 03, 2006, 02:30:51 PM

this statement has never ever been true in the eyes of bodybuilding in general or the judges.

ever.

did charles atas flex his calf in the 1940's?

hell no.

He flexed his biceps:

had he extended a calf, he would have got his ass kicked and sand kicked in HIS face.

bodybuidling would be even more gay than it already is.

That was well before established criteria , in the contests in the 1940s they used to judge a competitors teeth !!

Hulkster · « **Reply #15549 on:** December 03, 2006, 02:38:27 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on December 03, 2006, 02:32:19 PM

That was well before established criteria , in the contests in the 1940s they used to judge a competitors teeth !!

lucky dorian was not competing then!