hey dumbass, bodybuilding is a purely visual sport. The judges don't get onstage and measure each bodybuilder or ask them how much they weigh. So if Ronnie looks the same width as Dorian in pics and videos, then it wouldn't matter if there was actually an inch difference between them. You wouldn't be able to tell just by looking at them. For all intents and purposes, Ronnie and Dorian were the same width.
But this is not what you said earlier! You said that Ronnie's lats were of the same width as Dorian, and I dared you to prove it and you failed. And no, just because Ronnie might appear to be as wide for
you doesen't mean that he looks as wide to everyone else. To me, Dorian looks wider. This is especially true since I'm not a bodybuilding newbie such as you, and thus I can see that Ronnie's smaller waist gives the impression of his lats being wider than they really are. Bodybuilding is visual, grnated, but measures are absolute and mathematical. I never said that Dorian was wider - I can't prove it -; I said that, based on the evaluation of their respective physiques, and of the mathematical fact that they weight the same yet Ronnie had clearly bigger quads, as well as the fact that Dorian's taper appear to be as good as Ronnie's even though the latter's waist is smaller, I guesstimated that Dorian's lats were wider. You, conversely, flat out said that Ronnie's lats were as wide. Since you affirmed that, I expected you to provide evidence. Waht evidence did you provide? You showed pics, a purely visual "evidence" that is as unreliable as they come. Keep trying kid, 'cause you've got lots tro learn.
I copied your expression b/c I saw that it could be used against you. Dorian was more unbalanced than Ronnie. At least with Ronnie, he was huge everywhere (except his calves). His arms, chest, back, and legs were all huge. Dorian had twig arms, a flat chest, and narrow quads to go with his huge back.
Yes, you copy a lot of my expressions and even my prose style. I guess you admire me, yet don't want to hurt your ego by admitting it. Dorian was more unbalanced than Ronnie? This is not true even if we're talking about the 1999 Coleman, let alone the 2003 one! Dorian's arms were only about an inch or so smaller than Ronnie's in his 1999 version. If Dorian had "twig" arms, then Ronnie's arms were twigs plus an inch!
Besides, arms are not that important as a bodypart as far as discrediting Dorian, because Dorian's arms worked for him better from more angles than Ronnie's. Ronnie did not, and I mean, did not have any significant size advantage over Dorian besides quads. That's why they weighted the same, dumbass! Ronnie's ches was huge? Yes, and so was Dorian's! Coleman's back was huge? Yes, and so was Dorian's - even more so than Ronnie's in his 1999 form, even if by only the slimmest of margins. If Ronnie had so many advantages over Dorian in all the bodyparts you've mentioned, then why they weighted the same? Idiot.
what the hell does that have to do with being unbalanced? Ronnie also has a pair of the biggest arms and legs to go with his best back of all-time.
Ronnie did have good symmetry from the back in 1999 - except for calves -, but his symmetry sucked in 2003. His hams and glutes grew far more than his back. Look at pics from the 1999 to 2003, and you'll see that, even though Ronnie already had great quads in 1999, they grew exponentially in 2003 and became the most massive in the history of the sport. This is also true for his hams and glutes. This, coupled with the exponential growth of his gut, tells me that most of those 30 lbs he gained were gut, quads, hams and glutes. To put it bluntly, mostly legs and gut distension. My point is that his lower body grew assymetrically in relation to his back in 2003, creating a symmetrical blance. Are you denying that Ronnie's hams and glutes grew only as much as his back? Keep trying! When you compound this with the fact that his calves became even mroe of a liability in 2003, you understnad why I qualified Ronnie's 2003 physique as being assymetrical from the back.
of course you would focus on a man's ass. Why am I not surprised?
It''s hard not to focus, since his ass dominates his entire body from the back. Again, glutes, like abs, are the only bodypart that should not be hypertrophied. In the case of the abs, that's because it is the centrla focus of the body, and a distended midsection gives an appearance of obesity, the opposite of an inshape physique; in the case of the glutes, women have larger glutes than men, so large glutes are unmanly. As for your homosexual insinuations, I'll take that as an admission of defeat. As I've said before, when you're losing and frustrated, you either pic at straws of diverge the topic to something else.
how is that a lame excuse? Nobody likes to read lengthy posts. It's not my fault that you are too retarded to use fewer words.
Excuses, excuses and more excuses!
I already explained to you that I wanted to lend some credence to my posts compared to, say, a person who's been following bodybuilding for only a few months. It seems you're the dumbass for not being able to read properly.
It;'s remarkable that you bring up the topic of the amount of time that you've been following the sport and then, when I reply that I've been following it for even longer, you say that it's immaterial. I cought you with your own argument, moron.
Don't flatter yourself kid. You have yet to beat me in anything except maybe stupidity. You are the laughing stock of this board. I already replied to your response in the religious board.
Yes, and your reply was, I quote:
"Nothing you wrote disproves what I said. Nice try, kid."
Wow! What a profound answer! I think it's funny that you said I wouldn't answer your post because I thoughtg you would destroy me intellectually, but when I do, you just ignore it and say that I'm wrong because you just think I am. Who's the dumbass now, retard?
what is there to be ashamed of? If anything, I'd say you're the one who's ashamed b/c you criticize my pic instead of posting yours. C'mon, let's see it you little bitch of a man.
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! I never said I had a great physique, so I have nothing to prove! You tried top prove that you were so huge dude, and proved only that you are a skinny geek who doesen't even work out.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
