okay, I keep hearing the term "waterlogged" being thrown around in reference to Ronnie. I think people are confusing his fullness with holding additional water. Ronnie's quads are gigantic and have crazy sweep to them. This may give them the appearance they are waterlogged. However, they have more separation and striations in that shot than Dorian. Ronnie's obliques spill out on the sides when he hits the abs-and-thighs, but this does not mean they are waterlogged. He just doesn't know how to hit this pose properly. In fact, Ronnie's obliques are feathered from top to bottom. I'm not sure why you say that his lats are holding lots of water b/c they look the same as Dorian's. The only difference is that Dorian's lats have more vascularity in that shot. However, I thought vascularity wasn't an idicator of conditioning according to the Dorian nuthuggers. Ronnie's chest also looks dryer in that pic than Dorian's. His pecs are more crisp and detailed.
hahahaha...wow, this is a crock of shit.
Ronnie WAS waterlogged. How do I know? Compare the pictures to 98 and 99, and it is clear Ronnie was fatter and holding more water. If you can't see that, you don't deserve to be debating in this thread.
As well, bulging, fat, obliques are the results of incorrect posing

Fuck that. Even if it was, it doesn't matter, he still looks like horseshit.
At least use 99 Ronnie against Yates
