Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce  (Read 3489385 times)

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #31250 on: July 09, 2007, 11:25:09 AM »
dillett, fux and nasser were bigger than yates. none of whom beat dorian.

Lee Haney had a comparable back and better taper. Guess what? He beat Dorian.

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #31251 on: July 09, 2007, 11:34:13 AM »
Shut the hell up peanut brain. 2003 was garbage. Coleman was fat and looking like a cow.





You should make a new Thread with name being:

"2003 was garbage. Coleman was fat and looking like a cow."

Just to see how stupid you are. You will get the bashing of a life time.

Then again, you're to big of a pussy to do it, and if you do do it, you will just look like an idiot as usual.

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #31252 on: July 09, 2007, 11:35:35 AM »
go away you little child...you are a damn newbie to this thead.

LOL, answer the post then genius  ;D

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #31253 on: July 09, 2007, 11:51:23 AM »
It is amazing how the Ronnie fans believe that Dorian would stand no chnce against the 2003 Ronnie only becasue of the difference in size. They don't understand that Dorian has vastly better symmetry than the 2003 Coleman, and that symmetry constitutes 50% of the judging criteria.

which version of Dorian are we talking about? The only year I can fathom you claiming Dorian had better symmetry is 93, and even then it's a stretch. Dorian's arms were too small for his torso and his lower pecs overpowered his upper pecs. Furthermore, symmetry also includes the correspondence of opposite sides. The left side of Dorian's back doesn't perfectly mirror his right side like Ronnie's does. So it's beyond me how you can say Dorian had "vastly better symmetry" than 03 Ronnie.

Quote
They also ignore that muscularity is not comprised only of size, but also of separations, dryness and hardness, which Dorian has the edge over Coleman.  So Dorian wins 50% of the points by having better symmetry, and he at least ties the muscularity round - Coleman has the bigger muscles, but Dorian's are harder and more defined. In conclusion: Dorian Yates defeats the 2003 Coleman.

Ronnie in 03 had superior muscular bulk, separations, striations, and shape. It's obvious the muscularity round would flat out go to Ronnie. Even if we entertain the nonsense that Dorian had better symmetry, we can clearly see the difference in muscularity between them far outweighs the difference in symmetry. In conclusion, 03 Ronnie would beat Dorian.

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #31254 on: July 09, 2007, 01:56:35 PM »
Suckmeistro you totally typed exactly what I predicted. Please read above what I wrote pre-owning you. :)

  Sorry, sport, but that the 2003 Coleman has small calves and a large butt for his size are facts, and that constitues symmetrical liabilities. So, you didn't "pre-own" anyone, vis-a-vis the fact that I am right about this - and your post was addressed at Rocket and not me. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Camel Jockey

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16711
  • Mel Gibson and Bob Sly World Domination
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #31255 on: July 09, 2007, 02:00:39 PM »
Put an end to this topic you homos.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #31256 on: July 09, 2007, 02:11:18 PM »
I emailed Ronnie concerning this matter....nonetheless, he was not very happy with me  :D

Hard to believe, you're so charming LOL Did you explain that you're one of getbig's top trolls and would like to waste his time for no good reason? :o

Old news, if you'd been here all along instead of being a bandwagon jumper you'd know that i told him about the thread around christmas and he justifiably said GB's too negative. Like most pros would after reading any of pubes' internet diahhrea.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #31257 on: July 09, 2007, 02:13:26 PM »
you guys are really pathetic...
i was away from this board for like 2 years..
and you still have the same shitty conversation...

Self-ownage being on here. :-* Even pubes laughs at you.

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #31258 on: July 09, 2007, 02:26:11 PM »
dillett, fux and nasser were bigger than yates. none of whom beat dorian.

none of them had a back either ::).

Ronnie does. and its better than Dorian's by popular opinion.
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #31259 on: July 09, 2007, 02:27:28 PM »
Quote
"2003 was garbage. Coleman was fat and looking like a cow."


and 1994 was different..how???

 ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #31260 on: July 09, 2007, 02:29:09 PM »
was any part of dorian soft during his entire career?

no.


lol  ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away

delta9mda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7365
  • Team Pussy Claad/ ya know I'm sayin?
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #31261 on: July 09, 2007, 02:35:48 PM »
none of them had a back either ::).

Ronnie does. and its better than Dorian's by popular opinion.
fux had a back, get real boy.

IceCold

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #31262 on: July 09, 2007, 02:42:08 PM »
and 1994 was different..how???

 ::)

dorian was not out of shape.

he was still the hardest and dryest onstage.

that's why.
R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)

IceCold

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #31263 on: July 09, 2007, 02:43:05 PM »
none of them had a back either ::).

Ronnie does. and its better than Dorian's by popular opinion.

only by the polls you post.

the ones i posted (elite fitness, mayhem) are ignored.

even if they were from 2002, that would still included 99, and dorian was voted #1.

R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)

RocketSwitch625

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2420
  • Women fall all over me and Pumpster is FUGLY.
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #31264 on: July 09, 2007, 04:26:54 PM »
This beats Ronnie Coleman:


RocketSwitch625

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2420
  • Women fall all over me and Pumpster is FUGLY.
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #31265 on: July 09, 2007, 04:27:54 PM »
So does this:


RocketSwitch625

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2420
  • Women fall all over me and Pumpster is FUGLY.
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #31266 on: July 09, 2007, 04:28:28 PM »
And so does this:


pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #31267 on: July 09, 2007, 04:52:48 PM »
This beats Ronnie Coleman:



hahahah not only does it not beat Coleman but notice he gets "one of dem blacks" to try to compare LOL

ironneck

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14419
  • team young getbiggers
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #31268 on: July 09, 2007, 05:59:47 PM »
Self-ownage being on here. :-* Even pubes laughs at you.

shut up bitch

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #31269 on: July 09, 2007, 06:18:20 PM »
Suckmyasshole, you want a concise argument why 99 Ronnie would beat Dorian?  here you go:

First, we have to look at why dorian won so much (this argument assumes all judging is fair, which we all know every single Mr. O has been given gifts, including ronnie and dorian).

He won because:

a) he was bigger than most of his opponents.

and

b) he had a great back, of which NONE of his larger opponents had.

Now, Dorian easily beat a prepubscent Ronnie for a whole number of reasons, such as:

-lack of conditioning on Ronnie's part
-lack of a lower body at all (ronnie didn't even really have decent quads until 99 to begin with)
-lack of width relative to his frame (look at mid 90's shots of Ronnie compared to 99 - he looked odd until his frame filled out with muscle)
-lack of exposure on ronnie's part

Now, look at 99 Ronnie:

1. he had a back that surpassed dorian's even if only slightly.
2. He was the same size
3. He was just as wide
4. but had a much smaller waist and more dramatic taper.
5. He had much better detail from the front.


Mandatories:

front double bi - ronnie easily.
side chest - Ronnie easily  - look at the side chest shots from 99. Dorian doesn't come close.
most muscular - see above
Side tri - dorian- even though his tris lack striations, they look better in this pose than ronnie's.
Back double bi - Ronnie - dorian wins from the knees on down.. :-\ Makes dorian's back look paper thin and armless..
Rear lat spread - Ronnie easily - look at the width and taper. Hell, the dorian fans are even claiming that the shots are 'stretched' ::) when in reality, that is what a lat spread looks like when you have the lats of dorian with the waist of someone like Flex: you get Ronnie.
Ab and thigh: dorian - even though his thighs are piss poor compared to 99 Ronnie's, his abs are way better than Ronnie's alien abs.
Front Lat Spread: Dorian, even though he has no cuts in sight in this pose, his lats look a lot better from the front.

Ronnie wins the mantatories: 5 to 3.

Relaxed Round:

Front relaxed: ronnie by a landslide - way better taper, cuts. dorian looks like well, twigs on a barrel (with a keg stomach in 93) in this pose.

Side shots: even. no advantage either way here.

Back relaxed: ronnie easily - equal width, more dramatic taper. way way better glutes and hams. dorian has better calves. thats it.

So, for rounds one and two, its Ronnie.

Posing Round : even. both of these guys would receive a perfect score in this round like they always do if they are in shape.

Conclusion: Ronnie 99 wins, based on the merits of his physique.

Some pics: Ronnie relaxed back shot, Ronnie front shot. dorian front shot, Ronnie 99 side chest:









Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #31270 on: July 09, 2007, 06:55:54 PM »
here we can see how dorian wins the ab and thigh, since even though his quads look like an amateur's compared to the shape and detail of Ronnie's, he has better abs..
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #31271 on: July 09, 2007, 06:58:28 PM »
top 3 in 93 vs top 3 in 99, front double bi.

Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #31272 on: July 09, 2007, 06:59:25 PM »
notice, dorian gets owned by everyone with the possible exception of oily 99 Flex.. :-\
Flower Boy Ran Away

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #31273 on: July 09, 2007, 07:44:06 PM »
Dorian is owning Coleman, Flex (twice LOL), Cormier, and Ray in that comparison...too much size and granite hardness.

Get Rowdy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1704
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #31274 on: July 09, 2007, 07:53:12 PM »
In that last comparison, the only thing Ronnie has better than Dorian is arms.  Even Dorian's quads look just as good as Ronnie's there.