Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3491076 times)

IceCold · « **Reply #31225 on:** July 08, 2007, 07:05:41 PM »

Quote from: suckmymuscle on July 08, 2007, 06:09:44 PM

This would be all fine and dandy, Hulky, if it weren't for one thing: there is an official bodybuilding judging criteria to consider, and Dorian is better according to that criteria.

Also, the opinion of these people are irrelevant, because most of the people polled are 16 year-old kids who were 7 years old the last time Dorian won a Sandow, so it's not fair to match Dorian vs Ronnie in polls due to the celebrity factor. As one would say "out of sight, out of mind". Most of these kids have no idea of the greatness that was Dorian Yates, and some of them don't even know that he exists.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

exactly.

notice on every thread concerning guys from the 90's, people always comment how great the caliber of talent was.

IceCold · « **Reply #31226 on:** July 08, 2007, 07:06:19 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on July 08, 2007, 07:04:38 PM

can you not see your monitor dumbass?

his arms and quads were SOFT. in all years.

get out of your fantasy world and live in reality:

see my post and contest results for reality.

Hulkster · « **Reply #31227 on:** July 08, 2007, 07:07:03 PM »

here is dorian extending and flexing his supersoft quad in 93, and showing off his supersoft arms too.

his chest was hard though:

ps Icecold when you show a shot of dorian purposely avoiding flexing his quads (he always shows his calves and inner thigh in the ab shot because even HE knows they suck) its a pretty good indication of a major weak point.

that thankfully, is visible in many other shots:

Hulkster · « **Reply #31228 on:** July 08, 2007, 07:08:15 PM »

LOL nice quads.

look to dorian's left hand side (your right) for what real hardness looks like:

Hulkster · « **Reply #31229 on:** July 08, 2007, 07:09:17 PM »

Quote from: IceCold on July 08, 2007, 07:06:19 PM

see my post and contest results for reality.

lol what do constest result have to do with the fact that dorian had soft quads?

by your own admission 2003 Ronnie had a soft back and he dominated like no other Mr. O in history that year..

pobrecito · « **Reply #31230 on:** July 08, 2007, 07:16:19 PM »

Dorian's calf is bigger than Shawn's quad in that picture $:-\$

IceCold · « **Reply #31231 on:** July 08, 2007, 07:36:11 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on July 08, 2007, 07:09:17 PM

lol what do constest result have to do with the fact that dorian had soft quads?

by your own admission 2003 Ronnie had a soft back and he dominated like no other Mr. O in history that year..

didnt dominate like 93.

soft quads?

phyxsius · « **Reply #31232 on:** July 08, 2007, 07:45:50 PM »

Define soft you dumbass.

Dorian's arms are not soft. They're hard but smooth.

Ronnie's back in 2003 is not that soft either, just became smoother.

IceCold · « **Reply #31233 on:** July 08, 2007, 07:49:43 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on July 08, 2007, 07:08:15 PM

LOL nice quads.

look to dorian's left hand side (your right) for what real hardness looks like:

nice quads like this?

delta9mda · « **Reply #31234 on:** July 08, 2007, 07:51:29 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on July 08, 2007, 07:16:19 PM

Dorian's calf is bigger than Shawn's quad in that picture $:-\$

didnt i say that a while ago?

pobrecito · « **Reply #31235 on:** July 08, 2007, 08:00:51 PM »

Quote from: delta9mda on July 08, 2007, 07:51:29 PM

didnt i say that a while ago?

was any part of Dorian soft at the 1995 mr olympia?

IceCold · « **Reply #31236 on:** July 08, 2007, 08:12:40 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on July 08, 2007, 08:00:51 PM

was any part of Dorian soft at the 1995 mr olympia?

was any part of dorian soft during his entire career?

no.

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #31237 on:** July 08, 2007, 08:17:56 PM »

Quote from: IceCold on July 08, 2007, 07:01:46 PM

so, ronnie's skin color became lighter for the night show?

btw, it doesnt matter what set of pics you use, yates is still better.

Sure he is

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=69359.msg2194146#msg2194146

So far none of you punks have replied to this post. Just a bunch of pricks.

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #31238 on:** July 08, 2007, 08:19:49 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on July 08, 2007, 07:16:19 PM

Dorian's calf is bigger than Shawn's quad in that picture $:-\$

Bigger than his (yates) arms also, LOL

pobrecito · « **Reply #31239 on:** July 08, 2007, 08:21:01 PM »

Quote from: Iceman1981 on July 08, 2007, 08:17:56 PM

Sure he is

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=69359.msg2194146#msg2194146

So far none of you punks have replied to this post. Just a bunch of pricks.

go away you little child...you are a damn newbie to this thead.

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #31240 on:** July 08, 2007, 09:00:32 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on July 08, 2007, 06:40:38 PM

The reasons why I choose the 1999 Ronnie should be quite clear:

Hulkster, that is not an argument. You just posted a bunch of pics and gave no reason for why you believe that the 1999 Olympia Ronnie would defeat Dorian. Waht I want from you is a concise, logical argument, while having the I.F.B.B official judging criteria in mind, for why this version of Coleman would defeat Dorian. I can see the argument for Coleman in his 2003 version defeating Dorian due to the size difference, but you have yet failed to present any tangible reason for why the 1999 Coleman would defeat Dorian. I have already made mya rgument for why a 1995 Olympia Dorian would defeat the 1999 Ronnie: he is just as muscular as Ronnie in both the symmetry and in most mandatories in the muscularity round, and has better symmetry than Ronnie in two angles of the symmetry round and in five of the mandatories. Ergo, all things consider, Dorian wins. Until you give logical reasons for why Coleman would win, you have proven nothing.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #31241 on:** July 08, 2007, 09:04:17 PM »

And Hulkster, cut the crap about Dorian only looking good when standing alone. Bodybuilding contests are about comparisons. The only time when bodybuilders are alone onstage is during the posing round, which constitutes a minuscule portion of a bodybuilding contest. Dorian Yates became Mr.Olympia because he was compared to the other top bodybuilders in the World and deemed to be better overral in terms of muscularity and symmetry.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #31242 on:** July 08, 2007, 09:10:13 PM »

It is amazing how the Ronnie fans believe that Dorian would stand no chnce against the 2003 Ronnie only becasue of the difference in size. They don't understand that Dorian has vastly better symmetry than the 2003 Coleman, and that symmetry constitutes 50% of the judging criteria. They also ignore that muscularity is not comprised only of size, but also of separations, dryness and hardness, which Dorian has the edge over Coleman. So Dorian wins 50% of the points by having better symmetry, and he at least ties the muscularity round - Coleman has the bigger muscles, but Dorian's are harder and more defined. In conclusion: Dorian Yates defeats the 2003 Coleman.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Bear · « **Reply #31243 on:** July 09, 2007, 08:14:14 AM »

Quote from: Bear on July 08, 2007, 06:22:57 AM

Haha this is just it. Great though Yates was, and huge in his time, he couldn't stand next to Ronnie '03 and look anything other than dwarfed.

Bear · « **Reply #31244 on:** July 09, 2007, 08:15:10 AM »

Quote from: Bear on July 08, 2007, 06:25:50 AM

P.S. I proclaim watever Rocket-tard is about to write about calves or arse to be irrelevant if you just look at the pictures. NO ONE would say Dorian wins there unless they were stuck in a very long internet argument that they had invested hours of time in.

Bear · « **Reply #31245 on:** July 09, 2007, 08:15:43 AM »

Quote from: suckmymuscle on July 08, 2007, 06:13:37 PM

Well, Dorian is defeating Coleman flat out in symmetry, evident by his bigger calves and smaller glutes. As for muscularity, it is match: Ronnie has the greater absolute size, but Dorian's back is harder and more derfined. So don't fool yourself for a minute that Dorian wouldn't be able to defeat the 2003 Coleman, because he had several things on him except puffy size.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Bear · « **Reply #31246 on:** July 09, 2007, 08:17:08 AM »

Suckmeistro you totally typed exactly what I predicted. Please read above what I wrote pre-owning you.

ironneck · « **Reply #31247 on:** July 09, 2007, 08:38:31 AM »

you guys are really pathetic...
i was away from this board for like 2 years..
and you still have the same shitty conversation...

pobrecito · « **Reply #31248 on:** July 09, 2007, 10:55:57 AM »

I emailed Ronnie concerning this matter....nonetheless, he was not very happy with me

delta9mda · « **Reply #31249 on:** July 09, 2007, 11:00:46 AM »

dillett, fux and nasser were bigger than yates. none of whom beat dorian.