Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[Hulkster]

Johnnytosh absolutley annihilated Hulksters 1300 pages of arguments easily, with those photos.
Ouch.
So much time wasted on Hulksters part.
Dorian looks fantastic in those 97 pics.

LOL what the fuck are you talking about?

[pumpster]

I daresay Yates owned in one of his "best shots" 

[Hulkster]

so much for yates 97..

[Hulkster]

I find it funny that you guys have the balls to even compare dorian 97 to peak ronnie.

its just laughable at best:

[Shockwave]

LOL what the fuck are you talking about?

All I see is you melting down and frantically posting pics.
You can tell when you get all worked up.
You post 3 posts in a row claiming how bad he is, and dont accept that in those shots by Johnnytosh show Dorian looking flat great.
So much for telling us how bad Dorian was in 97.

[Shockwave]

Oh, btw, I thought Dillet was supposed to make Dorian look like a child from the front?
More Hulkster misconceptions shattered.

[Iceman1981]

97 pre-judging

[Iceman1981]

97

[Iceman1981]

97..

[Dave Baran]

what the hell is wrong with his biceps 

[pumpster]

Holy crap, Yates' waist looks gigantic there. H-taper once again-is the point of these pics to prove again that he should've lost? Nasser's killing him in that 2nd shot.

[Hulkster]

gee Shockwave, dorian looked flat great in 97...

lol

 

[Hulkster]

what the hell is wrong with his biceps 

he tore his left arm early in his pro career and his arms got worse and worse every year.

they were not very good to begin with even before the tear..

and by 97 (along with torn tris) they were the worst of any Mr. O. besides Dickerson.

[pumpster]

Oh, btw, I thought Dillet was supposed to make Dorian look like a child from the front?
More Hulkster misconceptions shattered.

You mean here? LOL

[Hulkster]

Oh, btw, I thought Dillet was supposed to make Dorian look like a child from the front?
More Hulkster misconceptions shattered.

LOL seeing dillett's arms compared to dorian's arms in 97 is just hilarious!

[Hulkster]

All I see is you melting down and frantically posting pics.
You can tell when you get all worked up.
You post 3 posts in a row claiming how bad he is, and dont accept that in those shots by Johnnytosh show Dorian looking flat great.
So much for telling us how bad Dorian was in 97.

please show me where I said I did not accept the those shots.

I used those shots against Ronnie and Dorian got owned.

dorian 97 was not even close to Ronnie 99 or dorian 93 for that matter.

 

[Hulkster]

All I see is you melting down and frantically posting pics.

yeah, who would ever post pics on a thread comparing Ronnie to dorian?

I forgot, its only words on a page that matter..this sport is for the blind.

 

[Shockwave]

No one ever said he was close.
Hes a lot better than you gave him credit for in 97.

[pumpster]

No one ever said he was close.
Hes a lot better than you gave him credit for in 97.

I'm willing to put Yates '97 head to head with Coleman 2006.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Here is the same "eyewitness" saying Ronnie at his prime is unbeatable.

Peter McGough - Flex, August 2005

"Ronnie sporting that [01 ASC] look would, in my opinion, be unbeatable."

2003 isn't his prime which you have continually been pushing . and once again its Peter's opinion its not fact and I do respect his opinion I disagree with it and why? 1995 Dorian is bigger , better balanced has equal or better condition and density with a better mastery of the mandatory poses , the opinion on who would be unbeatable is subjective and open for debate , the opinion Ronnie was off from 98-99 isn't subjective .

[NarcissisticDeity]

Ronnie had superior separations and striations from head to toe. Who are you to say one - especially something completely subjective as 'hardness' - is more important than the other?

Superior separations ? some not all Dorian's back his whole back just crushes Ronnie's , Dorian's midsection as a whole his much sharper , and the means in which you come to your conclusion are faulty ( see the quotes of Yates looks light years ahead of the way he looks in photos and video ) and hardness isn't subjective , either you have fat & water in your muscles or you don't , and I've already stated that striations are genetic and are NOT always an indication of a state of being completely bone dry and rock hard

Dorian's conditioning is legendary as a whole the 1990s the guys all had amazing conditioning , hence why guys like Flex , Long have kidney problems , why guys like Dillett and other froze onstage why the IFBB had to litteraly start diuretics testing . Why did Ronnie lose the 2006 Mr Olympia? not because of any triceps or lat problem just could match him in size now ( pound for pound ) Jay's back was improved and Jay was better conditioned

Conditioning will win a contest , see Ronnie 1998 over Flex , see Yates 1997 , when all things are pretty much equal it will come down to conditioning

quote Flex magazine Jan 1999

When Ronnie is 100% , Flex has to be 100% to prevail. On October 10 , 1998 , Flex wasn't and Ronnie was.


1998 Flex's conditioning wasn't 100% and thats why he lost

Flex Wheeler

It's true I didn't quite duplicate my condition at the Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic. if I'd been able to do that , I would have won EASILY !!


Flex on 1998 Mr Olympia

[NarcissisticDeity]

yes it is.

and so are striations.

something that you guys have argued is not important or even judged because it is not specifically stated in the criteria..
lol

caught again in your own desperate arguments..

I never said it wasn't judged just that it doesn't win contests ( see Munzer ) and Yates has plenty of striations you think because Ronnie had more he's better conditioned and or would win because of that and thats simply not true

[NarcissisticDeity]

01 ASC Ronnie looked amazing!!! It's no wonder Peter McGough said he is unbeatable.

Ronnie at the 2001 did look fantastic , probably his best showing , he had probably match Yates for that bone dry and rock hard look to his muscles , albeit much lighter than Dorian 1995 , Dorian 1995 is noticeably bigger , denser , better balance & proportion and is a better poser

[NarcissisticDeity]

I have yet to see a single shot of dorian that can come close to this kind of shape, detail and quality:


sure, the calves are a flaw.

but the rest is of such a high caliber that even in 1993, dorian could not come close:

Dorian doesn't need to come close to anyones shape to beat him , he beat Flex who had ( in my opinion ) a much better shape than Ronnie

and again lets here your definition of quality and how Dorian exactly doesn't come close to it

[NarcissisticDeity]

No one ever said he was close.
Hes a lot better than you gave him credit for in 97.

Great point ! I personally thought Yates should have lost just based on what limited pictures I had seen , but I can understand why he won despite the torn muscles he was massive and still bone dry and rock hard

I'm telling you if Ronnie was bone dry and rock hard in 2006 he would have won again , conditioning ( and size ) will determine a contest if all other things are equal .