Ronnie has the edge in (depending on the year):
- muscular size
- conditioning
- density
- balance and proportion
- definition
- taper
- aesthetics
see how easy it is to use your own argument against you? That's why your arguments suck. Be more specific and pick a year. Then we can compare.
Ronnie may have said that Dorian has the best back and side chest. However, he never said anything about losing to him. Dorian admitted that Ronnie would beat him. How does it feel to get a taste of your own medicine? 
Furthermore, you are liar!!! You haven't posted more quotes (which include critiques) than me. I own you in that department. You also haven't posted more pics than any of us. Maybe you posted more shots of Dorian, but we've posted more of Ronnie. Nice try.
Ronnie has the edge in (depending on the year):
- muscular size
- conditioning
- density
- balance and proportion
- definition
- taper
- aesthetics
This has all been addressed time and time again kid
muscular size - Dorian has the edge over Ronnie in 1998/1999/2001 it doesn't matte what parts you think are bigger compared to Dorian the fact that he weighs more means he has more muscular size
conditioning - Ronnie has NO edge in Dorian in the conditioning department , period there are time in his career where he may have matched Yates for that rock hard & bone dry conditioning ( 1998/2001 ) but edged him out NO thats fantasy and the years he may have matched him he was under 250 pounds
density - I can honestly think of NO year where Ronnie matches Yates for density , nevermind edges him out , this is like your comparisons ...fantasy
balance & proportion - man this is just an empty statement , either you're born with great balance & proportion or your not and Ronnie was not and he is not comparable to Yates in this department and to entertain any year Ronnie has an edge is lunacy
definition - again you're playing with words , when the judges are speaking of definition in the judging criteria it refers to conditioning , its a matter of semantics Ronnie may have more visible detail in some parts but Yates has his share , see conditioning
taper -

give me a fucking break you're now looking to make a long list so it appears Ronnie has so many advantages , I mean most everyone Yates faced had a better taper than him thats is an empty advantage
aesthetics - lmfao Ronnie may have a better looking body from this prospective but see taper for an empty advantage , Dorian beat some of the most aesthetic bodybuilding in the sport its not an advantage that determines contests
see how easy it is to use your own argument against you? That's why your arguments suck. Be more specific and pick a year. Then we can compare.
You didn't pick anything apart , you made a bunch of empty claims period
Dorian Yates specifically stated he has better balance & proportion than Ronnie and conditioning those two are not in dispute only in your imagination couple that with this quote from Bev Francis who is a IFBB Judge and she would know
Bev Francis : Bodybuilder's phsyique you most admire ?
The man Dorian Yates , his combonation of size and shape makes for an awesome physique , unlike a lot of big guys he's not a load of massive parts just thrown together , His symmetry is almost perfect , Everything is in proportion , no weak bodyparts .
she says Yates is unlike a lot of big guys , he's not a load of massive parts just thrown together ( see Ronnie Coleman )
Ronnie may have said that Dorian has the best back and side chest. However, he never said anything about losing to him. Dorian admitted that Ronnie would beat him. How does it feel to get a taste of your own medicine? 
Well you spoke to soon boy
Q. This is my last question for you Ronnie, and it's quite "hypothetical" but I believe it is a good one. Let's say that it would be possible to have a bodybuilding contest where the only competitors would be you, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Lee Haney, and Dorian Yates, and all of you in their prime condition. Who do you believe would win?
R.C. Come on now, this is the age of Ronnie Coleman who else would win... but I couldn't have beat them in their hey days. Ronnie admits he couldn't have beaten them in their hey-days

and Yates didn't admit Ronnie would beat just the judges would choose him because of a size advantage and he said repeatedly it was a very hard question for him to answer , so nice try

Furthermore, you are liar!!! You haven't posted more quotes (which include critiques) than me. I own you in that department. You also haven't posted more pics than any of us. Maybe you posted more shots of Dorian, but we've posted more of Ronnie. Nice try.
Whats with this liar nonsense? you said all I do is post 12 year old quotes and the Yates quote is from 2005 and a few others are from 2000+ ( so playing your game you are a liar ) and NO I posted tons of quotes and you know you guys all dismissed them from the very start and still do all the while posting your own ( see hypocrite ) where did you get the McGough quote about Ronnie ( in his opinion ) being unbeatable in 2001 ? from me

and I've posted more pics of both guys obviously more Yates' pics but believe me from to to end in this thread I posted more pics more pics that haven't beens seen too , I mean more pictures in general
so once again you haven't countered my argument you've just made blanket statements , again Dorian would win because
Y-93 - R-98 - Y has the edge in balance & proportion , density , ( may be tied on conditioning ) and has a advantage is muscular bulk , couple that with better posing and presentation - advantage Yates
Y-95 - R-98 - see above
Y-93 - R -99 - Y has the edge in balance & proportion , density , conditioning , and muscular bulk is a push because both weigh the same , couple that with better posing and presentation - advantage Yates
Y-95 - R-99 - see above
Y-93 - R-01 - Y has the edge in balance & proportion , density , conditioning may be a tie , muscular bulk , posing and presentation - advantage Yates
Y-95 - R-01 - see above
Y-93 - R-03 - see above Ronnie with a clear edge in muscular bulk
Y-95 - R - 03 - see above
Ronnie has the capability to beat Dorian , in all probability Dorian would win based on his many advantages , Ronnie never faced anyone like Dorian Yates the guy is a winning machine , he just has to many advantages and satisfies the criteria better than Ronnie , Dorian consistantly beat Ronnie and why? Ronnie was lacking two things that prevented him from being a winner size and conditioning and he had the size in 96/97 just not the conditioning , and you can play with size to a certain degree , conditioning is what sets first from second , Yates wrote the book on conditioned size , thats why he won in 97 despite having torn muscles and thats exactly why Ronnie lost in 2006 , couple that with Yates' other advantages its very safe to assume Dorian could and would beat Ronnie .