bwahahahaha, where do you come up with this shit? I demonstrated with a ruler that I got 14.5 cm. The only explanation is that our monitors are set to different resolutions.
Someone has already mentioned that he also got around 11 centimeters. In any case, you posted the measure that you got on your computer screen. That's not in any way, shape or form an accurate measurement. Like I said, the only way to know for sure would be to have the original pic, which I don't have. No omne has posted so far confirming you measure of 15 centimeters, so you have nothing. And you posted a com pletely arbitrary line on Dorian's foreamr and then measured a difference of 4 milimeters to Ronnie's. What is that supposed to prove when the line stops over an area of Dorian's foreamr that is torqued outward?
what magazine? I got both pics in my comparison from a screen cap.
That is not accurate. You cannot use the picture from a screencap because that is not the original picture. I think this pic originally appeared on FLEX, but I'm not sure.
wtf are you talking about? I scaled them to be the same height even though Ronnie is 1" taller in person. This actually favors Dorian.
Dorian is actually 5'10 and 1/2, but that doesen't matter. My critique is that you adjusted for height but not for depth because you maintained the width that Dorian originally had in the picture so as to make him artificialçly thiner compared to Ronnie. You also did a lousy job photoshopping the bodyparts where Ronnie is not a match fopr Dorian even when you make Dorian artifically thiner by not adjusting for height, like the calves.
I measured several anatomical landmarks to insure the accuracy of my comparison. If one person was standing much closer to the camera, it would reveal itself. For example, the bottom of the feet and knees would line up but the waist and top of the head would be off. However, we see that everything lines up perfectly. It can be assumed from the pic they are both of equal depth.
Maybe for height, but not for width. I see the trick you used: get a picture where Dorian is stading more away from the camera than Ronnie, then adjust the depth to make them equally tall and so as to make their feet align somewhat, but maintain the width that Dorian had in the original pic and photoshop the bodyparts where Ronnie can't compare in size even when Dorian is made to look artifically thiner.
Dorian is facing the camera straight on while Ronnie is slightly turned to the side. If anything, this favors Dorian.
Observe how Dorian's left foot is slightly turned to the side and how he is more turned forward than Dorian. All of this makes him look wider. Add up to you poor scalling for width, and you get a Ronnie that looks much wider than he is vis-a-vis Dorian Yates.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
