While I’m on record as saying that the best physique I ever saw was Ronnie’s at the 2001 Arnold, he was never drier or harder than Dorian. In fact now that – 14 years after it happened – I recently for the first time saw the video of Dorian posing before the 1993 Olympia I have cause to rethink. I’m now not sure that Ronnie at 245 pounds would beat Dorian at 269 pounds. At a bigger bodyweight I think Ronnie would look soft next to an in-shape rock-hard Dorian.
Well thanks for
backing up and
proving our point you idiots. Why does it take you morons this long to realize that after reading that quote, Peter also agrees with the Ronnie side. Peter agrees that Ronnie ASC 01' can beat any version of what yates produced at any contest (93/95). Peter didn't think 93/95 contest yates was better than Ronnie, or else he would of mentioned it. So there goes the yates side argument right there (which was their argument since the beginning of this thread). Plus, Peter never said that yates would beat Ronnie. He said he is
"not sure". He can't pick a winner. So it is still up for debate between Ronnie ASC 01' and pre contest yates 93. The 93 video of yates still doesn't prove shit. Correct me if I'm wrong. I sure would like to here your excuses, but:
Last I heard, bodybuilding contests are judged on stage in front of judges and a audience, not in a gym wearing black socks with a camera man.Therefore, Peter just sent the final blow to the yates side and this thread is over. To think, you morons actually thought Peter's quote was in your favour, LOL. You morons can wake up from your dream now.
P.S. You can argue until your eyes pop out. I'm not going to waste my time on morons who think yates has better arms than Ronnie and that yates wins all of the mandatories, LOL. There is no point arguing with people who are that biased. Any of these versions of Ronnie BFTO 99' ,The Unbelievable 00', BFTO 02' and BFTO 03' would dwarf pre contest 93 yates and make him Ronnie's bytch.
