ha ha ha, oh brother!
I've supported my argument with visual evidence and knowledge of anatomy. What have you done? Nothing. All you do is type crap.
No, what you did is post pictures that show the extreme polar opposite of what you claim. Knowledge of anatomy? If you had any, you would know that the reason why Ronnie's triceps are far more massive in the upper part is because his triceps attach high in the tendom and thus he has few muscle fibers in the lower part of the muscle to develop. This is fairly obvious. And your angry tone and inability to argue without resorting to invective only goes to show that I've affected you and that my arguments were well made.
yawn, we've already discussed this. Notice the difference in shape and definition.
shorter lateral head
Yes, Ronnie has a shorter lateral head, which explains the lack of mass in the lower part of his triceps and thus it's poor shape in the side triceps mandatory.
longer lateral head
I can see you studied anatomy in some internet course. If you earned your degree at an accredited university, then that is prima fasce evidence of how bad the current American higher education system is.
you insinuated I'm not qualified to argue with you b/c I have a mundane understanding of bodybuilding. You couldn't be further from the truth.
That is not ad hominem. Ad hominem means "to the man" in Latin. It refers to attacking one's character and intentions to win an argument, and I didn't do that to you. I don't even know you. All I said is that, for someone who makes the appeal to authority argument to win an argument, you don't seem to know what you're talking about.