Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3142510 times)

tu_holmes · « **Reply #40875 on:** May 02, 2008, 12:12:53 PM »

Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on May 02, 2008, 11:06:23 AM

Flex voted Coleman's back number 1 because they felt sorry for the loser. 'Nuff said

I don't think having more Sandows than anyone else qualifies him as a "loser".

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #40876 on:** May 02, 2008, 12:31:13 PM »

Quote from: tu_holmes on May 02, 2008, 12:12:53 PM

I don't think having more Sandows than anyone else qualifies him as a "loser".

More than Haney? Are you sure?

tu_holmes · « **Reply #40877 on:** May 02, 2008, 12:34:02 PM »

Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on May 02, 2008, 12:31:13 PM

More than Haney? Are you sure?

Tied for first doesn't really help your argument champ.

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #40878 on:** May 02, 2008, 12:41:06 PM »

The biggest laughing stock in bodybuilding history.

Without doubt the funniest moment ever at the Olympia:

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #40879 on:** May 02, 2008, 12:55:13 PM »

Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on May 02, 2008, 12:41:06 PM

The biggest laughing stock in bodybuilding history.

what is your fascination with that shot of Ronnie spreading his legs from behind?

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #40880 on:** May 02, 2008, 02:12:44 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on May 02, 2008, 12:55:13 PM

what is your fascination with that shot of Ronnie spreading his legs from behind?

The question should be: Why did your favourite Mr. Olympia do something like that?

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #40881 on:** May 02, 2008, 08:11:36 PM »

Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on May 02, 2008, 02:12:44 PM

The question should be: Why did your favourite Mr. Olympia do something like that?

I thought we were comparing physiques. I could care less what Ronnie does on stage. You, however, seem to have a homoerotic fascination with Ronnie's ass. Are you gay by any chance?

Danimal77 · « **Reply #40882 on:** May 02, 2008, 08:48:18 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on May 02, 2008, 08:11:36 PM

I thought we were comparing physiques. I could care less what Ronnie does on stage. You, however, seem to have a homoerotic fascination with Ronnie's ass. Are you gay by any chance?

What's gay is that you've spent YEARS talking back and forth with a guy you believe to be gay.

Hulkster · « **Reply #40883 on:** May 02, 2008, 09:08:55 PM »

Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on May 02, 2008, 12:41:06 PM

The biggest laughing stock in bodybuilding history.

Without doubt the funniest moment ever at the Olympia:

no, this is much worse, for all the wrong reasons...

$:-\$

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #40884 on:** May 03, 2008, 01:24:55 AM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on May 02, 2008, 08:11:36 PM

I thought we were comparing physiques. I could care less what Ronnie does on stage. You, however, seem to have a homoerotic fascination with Ronnie's ass. Are you gay by any chance?

My girlfriend is beautiful with curves in all the right places and you don't even have one. All those hours you spent working out and dieting to achieve that fitness instructor physique really paid off.

You ain't got a woman because you take it up the shitter. LOL

Earl1972 · « **Reply #40885 on:** May 03, 2008, 03:58:06 PM »

exactly two years later

still no truce

E

Tombo · « **Reply #40886 on:** May 03, 2008, 09:27:51 PM »

RONNIE IS TEH BEST

NO WAI DORIAN IS BETTAR!!!

U EEDIOT TEH RONNIE WAS TA BEST GAI EVARRRR

SHADDAP! DORIAN HAD A BIGGAR BACK!!!!

STUPID MAN!!

NO U!!!!

Tombo · « **Reply #40887 on:** May 04, 2008, 01:55:23 AM »

yeah that shut you up

Hulkster · « **Reply #40888 on:** May 05, 2008, 01:58:19 PM »

you can see why all the dorian nuthuggers left:

look at the arm comparison.

its pitiful

delta9mda · « **Reply #40889 on:** May 05, 2008, 02:29:35 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on May 05, 2008, 01:58:19 PM

you can see why all the dorian nuthuggers left:

look at the arm comparison.

its pitiful

the only real diff that stands out is ronnie has biceps that originate farther down and obviously out of proportion to the triceps. yates biceps start closer to the arm pit and insert higher up on the bone (short biceps).

sculpture · « **Reply #40890 on:** May 05, 2008, 03:09:41 PM »

Quote from: delta9mda on May 05, 2008, 02:29:35 PM

the only real diff that stands out is ronnie has biceps that originate farther down and obviously out of proportion to the triceps. yates biceps start closer to the arm pit and insert higher up on the bone (short biceps).

No of course you're right.

"Thats" all that seperated ronnies arms from dorians.

Jeez.

What about the tricep seperation on ronnie (inner) evident even in that shot?

Hulkster · « **Reply #40891 on:** May 05, 2008, 05:27:41 PM »

Quote from: sculpture on May 05, 2008, 03:09:41 PM

No of course you're right.

"Thats" all that seperated ronnies arms from dorians.

Jeez.

What about the tricep seperation on ronnie (inner) evident even in that shot?

its painfully obvious that none of these clowns have a clue what they are talking about..

CigaretteMan · « **Reply #40892 on:** May 05, 2008, 09:38:54 PM »

Quote from: delta9mda on May 05, 2008, 02:29:35 PM

the only real diff that stands out is ronnie has biceps that originate farther down and obviously out of proportion to the triceps. yates biceps start closer to the arm pit and insert higher up on the bone (short biceps).

This is true. Conversely, Dorian's triceps insert lower in the tendom which is why his triceps is superior, as evident in the side triceps mandatory.

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #40893 on:** May 05, 2008, 10:41:39 PM »

Quote from: CigaretteMan on May 05, 2008, 09:38:54 PM

This is true. Conversely, Dorian's triceps insert lower in the tendom

no

CigaretteMan · « **Reply #40894 on:** May 05, 2008, 11:59:11 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on May 05, 2008, 10:41:39 PM

no

Ronnie's triceps are clearly higher than Dorian's, and the comparison you posted clearly shows it. What are you talking about?

turner98 · « **Reply #40895 on:** May 06, 2008, 01:45:17 AM »

The only good thing about this "truce" is the pictures.

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #40896 on:** May 06, 2008, 04:35:46 AM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on May 05, 2008, 10:41:39 PM

no

In that comparison there is hardly any difference in arm size. In fact Yates' triceps are clearly bigger and more separated than Coleman's. That pose does nothing to prove that Coleman had superior arm development. PWN£D. LOL

delta9mda · « **Reply #40897 on:** May 06, 2008, 06:03:12 AM »

ok ok ill concede that ronnie has superior biceps

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #40898 on:** May 06, 2008, 07:55:36 AM »

Quote from: CigaretteMan on May 05, 2008, 11:59:11 PM

Ronnie's triceps are clearly higher than Dorian's, and the comparison you posted clearly shows it. What are you talking about?

you must be mistaking Ronnie for Dorian. Ronnie's tricep lateral head extends all the way down to his elbow while Dorian's stops half way down.

CigaretteMan · « **Reply #40899 on:** May 06, 2008, 09:32:16 AM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on May 06, 2008, 07:55:36 AM

you must be mistaking Ronnie for Dorian. Ronnie's tricep lateral head extends all the way down to his elbow while Dorian's stops half way down.

No, Ronnie's triceps attaches much higher in the tendom, and it is evident in that he has little mass in the lower part of his triceps. This is not debatable. Dorian's triceps attach lower and this is why his triceps have the horseshoe shape and looks much better in the side triceps mandatory.