Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3134658 times)

Hulkster · « **Reply #40850 on:** April 28, 2008, 01:52:10 PM »

he is using delusional guy criteria that only he and two others can see

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #40851 on:** April 29, 2008, 11:53:06 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on April 28, 2008, 01:52:10 PM

he is using delusional guy criteria that only he and two others can see

I don't know why this picture is constantly posted by Coleman nut-huggers because let's face it his side tricep was by far his weakest mandatory. Even midgets such as Ray, Labrada and Priest could pull off better side tricep poses. LOL

This looks terrible. Smooth as shit and flat as a pancake triceps.

Tigerman · « **Reply #40852 on:** April 29, 2008, 12:02:28 PM »

Quote from: CigaretteMan on April 27, 2008, 07:29:09 PM

This picture is incredible. Ronnie couldn't match this granite look.

Sorry Dorian had excellent condition but not on this picture. He looks smooth and undetailed. Granite??? Whatever...

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #40853 on:** April 29, 2008, 12:13:02 PM »

I've always said that Lee Haney would have beaten Coleman and here is the proof:

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=212129.0

Hulkster · « **Reply #40854 on:** April 29, 2008, 02:42:20 PM »

Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on April 29, 2008, 12:13:02 PM

I've always said that Lee Haney would have beaten Coleman and here is the proof:

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=212129.0

so what? you have been saying dorian could beat a peak ronnie and look how wrong you have been? $:-\$

as good as Haney was, still not as good as this:

http://www.dailymotion.com/tag/Coleman/video/x3w9ak_ronnie-coleman-1999-mr-olympia-part_sport

Hell, ronnie even has better ABS than haney..

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #40855 on:** April 29, 2008, 03:52:26 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on April 29, 2008, 02:42:20 PM

so what? you have been saying dorian could beat a peak ronnie and look how wrong you have been? $:-\$

Please tell me how was I wrong? Yates beat Coleman 8 times and I believe the outcome would've been the same after 1997. Of course it would've been a closer contest but I still say any version of Yates would've won the battle.

Hulkster · « **Reply #40856 on:** April 29, 2008, 04:18:28 PM »

Quote

Please tell me how was I wrong?

easy.

you are wrong because Ronnie had a better physique at his peak using the conventional criteria than dorian ever did.

and this is easy visible with mountains and mountains of visual proof.

everyone can see this.

so should you:

Ronnie has better shape, more detail, equal size.

as has been said, Ronnie looks like a champion bodybuilder. Dorian, like a bricklaying construction worker.. $:-\$

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #40857 on:** April 29, 2008, 07:21:39 PM »

Hulkster · « **Reply #40858 on:** April 29, 2008, 07:45:26 PM »

jesus look at ronnie's back in 99

yates couldn't compete with that.

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #40859 on:** April 30, 2008, 11:08:34 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on April 29, 2008, 07:45:26 PM

jesus look at ronnie's back in 99

yates couldn't compete with that.

91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96 & 97 Yates displayed a more separated back than 99 Coleman. Admit it, you have no idea what you are talking about.

Hulkster · « **Reply #40860 on:** April 30, 2008, 03:17:08 PM »

LOL pretty odd considering that Ronnie is showing more detail than dorian in the fucking pic you posted LOL

tu_holmes · « **Reply #40861 on:** April 30, 2008, 03:42:56 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on April 30, 2008, 03:17:08 PM

LOL pretty odd considering that Ronnie is showing more detail than dorian in the fucking pic you posted LOL

I would disagree... Normally Ronnie looks unbeatable, but that one shot does make Dorian look a bit better... It's still just one photo.

Hulkster · « **Reply #40862 on:** April 30, 2008, 03:45:15 PM »

Quote

Normally Ronnie looks unbeatable

especially when compared to dorian..

tu_holmes · « **Reply #40863 on:** April 30, 2008, 04:00:13 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on April 30, 2008, 03:45:15 PM

especially when compared to dorian..

I agree... 90 out 100 photos of Ronnie will beat Dorian every time.

The ones that do on occasion beat him out always seem to be in black and white also... I wonder if that's a coincidence?

Hulkster · « **Reply #40864 on:** April 30, 2008, 04:33:39 PM »

Quote from: tu_holmes on April 30, 2008, 04:00:13 PM

I agree... 90 out 100 photos of Ronnie will beat Dorian every time.

The ones that do on occasion beat him out always seem to be in black and white also... I wonder if that's a coincidence?

its not.

dorian's glaring lack of detail (from the front) was lessened by the enhanced contrast of black and white photography:

in colour, it was even worse $:-\$

tu_holmes · « **Reply #40865 on:** April 30, 2008, 04:45:01 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on April 30, 2008, 04:33:39 PM

its not.

dorian's glaring lack of detail (from the front) was lessened by the enhanced contrast of black and white photography:

in colour, it was even worse $:-\$

Agreed!

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #40866 on:** May 01, 2008, 08:52:37 AM »

Dorian was good. Ronnie was better. [/thread]

England_1 · « **Reply #40867 on:** May 01, 2008, 01:04:50 PM »

Man, this is just fucking unbeatable. Dorian's condition here is unbelievable, veins everywhere in his back, ripped glutes and calves. Nice haircut too.

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #40868 on:** May 01, 2008, 03:42:18 PM »

Quote from: England_1 on May 01, 2008, 01:04:50 PM

Man, this is just fucking unbeatable. Dorian's condition here is unbelievable, veins everywhere in his back, ripped glutes and calves. Nice haircut too.

Too bad he gets owned in his best back pic:

"who was ranked as having the second-best back in bodybuilding history"

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #40869 on:** May 01, 2008, 04:24:27 PM »

Quote from: Iceman1981 on May 01, 2008, 03:42:18 PM

Too bad he gets owned in his best back pic:

"who was ranked as having the second-best back in bodybuilding history"

HA HA HA HA, ouch!!!

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #40870 on:** May 01, 2008, 04:25:46 PM »

Quote from: England_1 on May 01, 2008, 01:04:50 PM

Man, this is just fucking unbeatable. Dorian's condition here is unbelievable, veins everywhere in his back, ripped glutes and calves. Nice haircut too.

unbeatable my ass. Then why was Dorian's back ranked behind Ronnie's by Flex magazine?

Hulkster · « **Reply #40871 on:** May 01, 2008, 06:21:58 PM »

Quote from: England_1 on May 01, 2008, 01:04:50 PM

Man, this is just fucking unbeatable. Dorian's condition here is unbelievable, veins everywhere in his back, ripped glutes and calves. Nice haircut too.

good back. not the best back. note the difference.

its very easy to see why Ronnie owned him in the ranking:

HTexan · « **Reply #40872 on:** May 02, 2008, 10:52:51 AM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on May 01, 2008, 04:25:46 PM

unbeatable my ass. Then why was Dorian's back ranked behind Ronnie's by Flex magazine?

should have been behind stubbs as well

CigaretteMan · « **Reply #40873 on:** May 02, 2008, 10:54:14 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on April 29, 2008, 04:18:28 PM

as has been said, Ronnie looks like a champion bodybuilder. Dorian, like a bricklaying construction worker.. $:-\$

And yet, this didn't stop him from winning the super-bowl of bodybuilding six times. If we are trying to decide who's best by I.F.B.B judging standards, then you can't use shape as reason for why Dorian wouldn't win, because the I.F.B.B clearly rewards his shape.

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #40874 on:** May 02, 2008, 11:06:23 AM »

Quote from: Iceman1981 on May 01, 2008, 03:42:18 PM

Too bad he gets owned in his best back pic:

"who was ranked as having the second-best back in bodybuilding history"

Flex voted Coleman's back number 1 because they felt sorry for the loser. 'Nuff said