hre comes another retard saying dorian is better
you think dorian yates was proportional? he had no arms, no shoulders, all he had was a back and calves
Dorian was a hell of a lot more symmetrical than Ronnie. Coleman had shitty calves, big biceps with undersized triceps and brachialis, a hanging gut, short torso and long legs, a huge ass, high lats, etc. He had several flaws, both in terms of muscular balance as well as structure.
symmetric?
if you can be symmetric with no left bicep for years hahahahah
The issue o the torn left biceps is valid. But you need to understand that a biceps represents only 3% of the body's muscle mass, and that Dorian's torn left biceps was only clearly visible in the front double and didn't affect him in most other poses.
ronnie got his glutes shredded, when did we ever see dorian with shredded glutes? 
For starters, Dorian's glutes were shredded. Secondly, Ronnie's glutes were huge, and that's
not a good thing as far as bodybuilding goes. Why? Because a huge ass is feminine, and male bodybuilders are supposed to epitomize the ideal male physique.
I don't know why you can't accept that ronnie was better, he even won 2 more sandows than dorian
Irrelevant. Ronnie has more Sandows because Dorian retired early due to injuries. Dorian actually had more straight-firsts victories(5 vs 4) than Ronnie, and that shows who's the most dominant.
oh and he had his left arm when he beat those guys 
Dorian had his left arm, too, with the exception of the lower part of the biceps which was torn. And Dorian also had calves, which Ronnie lacked.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
